Is this Andrew Breitbart guy literally insane?

Breitbart does look as though he's been sleeping on a park bench for a month with only a whiskey bottle for comfort.
 
It certainly takes considerable talent to make OWS look reasonable and measured by comparison.

Not insane. Just a tool.
 
Yes, he must be thoroughly insane. How else could he think that a bunch of leftie loonies would behave themselves?
A biggoted sociopathic slimeball like Brietbart has no moral standing to shriek about people protesting injustice.

That that turd is still free to walk the streets is proof that there are shortcomings in the justice system or the mental health care system.

The sludge monster's relationship with reality ended in a messy divorce.
 
So the other 29 are also bonkers. But they share your biases so that makes it ok?
Have you heard of any OWS activist staging fake sting operations to deprive people of their right to organize to assist fellow citizens in the exercise of their rights.

Bear in mind that the sludge monster still associates with known criminals himself.
 
Not insane. Just white trash. Not much different from most conservative voters really.
 
While it may be a bit of a no true occupier fallacy, I am not aware of the occupiers featuring any white nationalists as speakers. That gives them the moral high ground over CPAC organizers and attendees. I readily await the "no true white nationalist" rebuttal.
And Occupy regularly schedules Maoist speakers and worship Che Guevara.

The tea party and the Occupiers are just 2 sides of the same coin, recreating the ideological battle between their respective heros Hitler and Stalin.
 
They've featured Communists. Communists are no better than Nazis.
Your willingness to dismiss the mainstream GOP candidates speaking at a conference that features* white nationalists is noted.


*and not in the "white nationalists, what the hell is up with them", way.

Daredelvis
 
And Occupy regularly schedules Maoist speakers and worship Che Guevara.

The tea party and the Occupiers are just 2 sides of the same coin, recreating the ideological battle between their respective heros Hitler and Stalin.

I will see your tu quoque and raise you a false equivalency. While members of the tea party and the OWS movement, may share distasteful attributes, there is no equivalent wholesale embrace of OWS by mainstream Democrats. The most odious OWS members do not feature prominently in the national Democratic party, OWS has no sway similar to what is seen with Tea Party fanatics involvement in the GOP.

Breitbart, Limbaugh, and Beck belong to the GOP, and the GOP belongs to them. Nothing on the left comes close to their insanity, or sway.

Daredelvis
 
I will see your tu quoque and raise you a false equivalency. While members of the tea party and the OWS movement, may share distasteful attributes, there is no equivalent wholesale embrace of OWS by mainstream Democrats. The most odious OWS members do not feature prominently in the national Democratic party, OWS has no sway similar to what is seen with Tea Party fanatics involvement in the GOP.

Breitbart, Limbaugh, and Beck belong to the GOP, and the GOP belongs to them. Nothing on the left comes close to their insanity, or sway.

Daredelvis
Are you kidding? OWS got a Dem Congressman to introduce an amendment to the Constitution that would basically repeal the 1st Amendment and clear the path for the government to censor the corporate news media.
 
They've featured Communists. Communists are no better than Nazis.

That's a ridiculous thing to say and you know it. Many people who consider themselves communists merely believe that wealth should be distributed differently, not that millions should die to accomplish that. You doubtless believe the free market to be a good idea, but that wouldn't make it fair for me to accuse you of supporting pinochet's murderous and torturous regime.
 

Back
Top Bottom