Dragon Family lawsuit against the United Nations

[Anders Lindman]

No, let's not assume it's true.

It's speculative but remember that when Fulford first talked about the Dragon Family lawsuit, people started calling him a fraud (if I remember correctly) and then such lawsuit was indeed filed! So the same thing could happen with this claim by Fulford that cabal members will be arrested.

What really makes it unlikely imo is that the cabal controls everything, so they cannot be arrested. Unless there are several shadow power groups running around but that's more speculation.

 

[Anders Lindman]

I came to think of a new idea. The secret cabal is like a Borg hive mind, so it will have no problem sacrificing a part of itself. Yikes. So the Dragon Family and the Federal Reserve can be run by the same cabal, and still the cabal can sacrifice some of its members, such as arresting the Federal Reserve Board that Fulford talked about, and other people in positions of power like that.

 

[Border Reiver]

if you go back to the OP you'll see we called the action a fraud because it is based on what we in the legal profession refer to as "twaddle".

People file lawsuits on spurious grounds all the time:

a. Mr. Joly sued a large number of parties on the grounds that he was in fact, a Martian;
b. Practically all of the lawsuits commenced by Ross Hainsworth; etc.

 

[Anders Lindman]

if you go back to the OP you'll see we called the action a fraud because it is based on what we in the legal profession refer to as "twaddle".

People file lawsuits on spurious grounds all the time:

a. Mr. Joly sued a large number of parties on the grounds that he was in fact, a Martian;
b. Practically all of the lawsuits commenced by Ross Hainsworth; etc.

But the lawsuit hasn't been dismissed yet as far as I know.

 

[JayUtah]

But the lawsuit hasn't been dismissed yet as far as I know.

...and we're back to the argument from page 1: the yet lack of dismissal does not give the case merit.

 

[Anders Lindman]

...and we're back to the argument from page 1: the yet lack of dismissal does not give the case merit.

Sure, it can be that it just takes time to dismiss the lawsuit. On the other hand, I have posted about how the bonds mentioned in the lawsuit may actually be real.

 

[Border Reiver]

But the lawsuit hasn't been dismissed yet as far as I know.

Give the court time, they tend to be busy dealing with claims with some merit to them - and then they keep getting clogged up with drivel like this - when it gets its turn in the docket the judge will do the right thing and dismiss the case.

 

[JayUtah]

Sure, it can be that it just takes time to dismiss the lawsuit.

And speaking from your vast practical experience with the American legal system, can you tell us how likely it is that this is the reason for the present lack of dismissal?

On the other hand, I have posted about how the bonds mentioned in the lawsuit may actually be real.

By quoting yet another unsubstantiated legal complaint, which at best offers only another naked claim and and worst refutes yours.

 

[Anders Lindman]

By quoting yet another unsubstantiated legal complaint, which at best offers only another naked claim and and worst refutes yours.

It was an article or blog post if I remember correctly that said that the Secret Service had said that the bonds are real. Sounds a bit like a Hollywood movie perhaps but anyway.

 

[JayUtah]

It was an article or blog post if I remember correctly that said that the Secret Service had said that the bonds are real. Sounds a bit like a Hollywood movie perhaps but anyway.

The source for the article was the complaint filed in yet another lawsuit. I checked your sources; you didn't.

 

[Anders Lindman]

The source for the article was the complaint filed in yet another lawsuit. I checked your sources; you didn't.

Impressive. Yeah, I'm a little sloppy sometimes.

 

[JayUtah]

Impressive. Yeah, I'm a little sloppy sometimes.

So you agree that after 35 pages of discussion, you have failed to substantiate any merit in this lawsuit.

 

[Anders Lindman]

So you agree that after 35 pages of discussion, you have failed to substantiate any merit in this lawsuit.

I don't know. Because I haven't checked the sources much. But I still think the lawsuit may be real.

 

[JayUtah]

I don't know. Because I haven't checked the sources much. But I still think the lawsuit may be real.

That wasn't a question. It was an observation.

 

[Border Reiver]

Impressive. Yeah, I'm a little sloppy sometimes.

Sometimes?!?

 

[Anders Lindman]

Sometimes?!?

He he. Yeah, because sometimes I look at the sources more carefully. Usually I don't like to put in much effort.

 

[Craig4]

It's speculative but remember that when Fulford first talked about the Dragon Family lawsuit, people started calling him a fraud (if I remember correctly) and then such lawsuit was indeed filed! So the same thing could happen with this claim by Fulford that cabal members will be arrested.

What really makes it unlikely imo is that the cabal controls everything, so they cannot be arrested. Unless there are several shadow power groups running around but that's more speculation.

It was filed and he's still a fraud and a liar.

 

[Anders Lindman]

It was filed and he's still a fraud and a liar.

Just because some predictions turned out to be false doesn't mean he is a liar.

 

[JayUtah]

He he. Yeah, because sometimes I look at the sources more carefully. Usually I don't like to put in much effort.

So you maintain that casual, uncritical perusal of conspiracy-theory web sites is going to save the world from the evils of peer-reviewed science.

 

[Anders Lindman]

So you maintain that casual, uncritical perusal of conspiracy-theory web sites is going to save the world from the evils of peer-reviewed science.

Absolutely. The sheer onslaught of the exponential growth of the Truth movement will cause the gatekeeper scientists to surrender due to exhaustion.