• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Psychic Sally morgan caught cheating?

Sally Morgan loses, a Mail editor inadvertantly admits to phone hacking on the stand?
 
Morgan wins after a long, expensive legal battle for both sides. Judge decides her reputation is worth squat and awards £1 damages, but not costs

I wrote this with my thumbs
 
snuffkin said:
Time for those lighting techs to come forward perhaps...
Click to expand...

Just wondering, but if this does go to court, would the theatre be required to make the lighting technicians take the stand?
What would happen if they were lying about it?
 
100 said:
Just wondering, but if this does go to court, would the theatre be required to make the lighting technicians take the stand?
What would happen if they were lying about it?
Click to expand...
Psychic Sally would win the case and damages and would claim this proved she was a genuine psychic even though she actually uses the same cold (and possibly warm/hot) reading techniques as every other fake one. She'd be able to brush off every challenge to have her supposed power tested on the grounds it had been proved in a court of law that she wasn't a fraud. It would be an enormous boost to her career.

If she didn't actually use the specific fraudulent technique described in the article (i.e. information provided via a microphone), or even if she did but she knows it can't be proved, taking this to court is absolutely the sensible thing for her to do.
 
welshdean said:
And it would come with the added benefit of getting bloody 'Asylum Seekers Rake in Benefits' off the front page of the Daily Fail.
Click to expand...

Illegal Immigrants found in Overcrowded Spirit World.

Too Many Voices Confuse Us Say Mediums
 
Pixel42 said:
Psychic Sally would win the case and damages and would claim this proved she was a genuine psychic even though she actually uses the same cold (and possibly warm/hot) reading techniques as every other fake one. She'd be able to brush off every challenge to have her supposed power tested on the grounds it had been proved in a court of law that she wasn't a fraud. It would be an enormous boost to her career.

If she didn't actually use the specific fraudulent technique described in the article (i.e. information provided via a microphone), or even if she did but she knows it can't be proved, taking this to court is absolutely the sensible thing for her to do.
Click to expand...
I meant if the theatre was lying about the technicians, unless you were talking about them too, and if that is the case, then you're going to have to lead me through on how Sally would win the case because the people indirectly supporting her claim that she doesn't use an earpiece were lying about it.
 
Pixel42 said:
Sorry, I thought you meant what if the technicians were lying.
Click to expand...

So, would the theatre be required to summon the technicians?
What would happen if they (the theatre) were lying about their statement?
 
Last edited:
About as serious as an army of marauding ghost Vikings gets.
 
Are you serious about it being serious??

Loved the Viking bit, and the "dumpy 60 year old from Fulham" bit too :D
 
Are you serious about me being serious about 100 seriously enquiring if you were serious?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom