Merged "Iron-rich spheres" - scienctific explanation?

Edx said:
How is it a misinterpreation? They said it was expected. That is the words they used. :rolleyes:




So you rerquire RJ Lee to be incompetent and ignorant, don't you? Why else would they say something that is so incorrect?

How can iron rich spheres be expected and not expected at the same time?
Click to expand...

Considering high temperatures. I'll say it all night.
 
superlogicalthinker said:
Thanks for admitting the first part Chris. But please tell me how they could possibly have hypothesized that when it had never happened in history.
Click to expand...

Because they said it was leaning, bulging, groaning and creaking and had unfought fires for over 7 hours and highly damanged on one side. THATS WHY. Why dont you go actually read what the firefighters and the FDNY actually said about 7, hmm? Because you have to believe they are all idiots or in on it.
 
Last edited:
superlogicalthinker said:
Wrong.This is a lie to cover up the truth. And an obvious one. Fail. Big fail. No logic. Failed logic.

Who are you to just dismiss other opinions but your own simply saying "failed logic " for every single excuse? That looks absolutely pathetic when you are reading through the post. Same thing every post.

The "Event" was the collapse. Everyone knows it except you.
Click to expand...

Ok, hypocrite. So it's ok for you to dismiss the entire NIST report with one handwave because "they're in on it", but if someone does the same thing to the RJ report you're all about standing up for it eh? Nice.

Who are you to dismiss the entire NIST report? Don't answer it, you have absolutely nothing to rebut it with anyway.

Fail. Big fail. No logic. Failed logic.
Click to expand...

You just summed up the entire 9/11 Troll Movement. Not to mention, since your nit picking other peoples posts, how can you have failed logic if there isn't any logic? :rolleyes:
 
superlogicalthinker said:
Considering high temperatures. I'll say it all night.
Click to expand...

No one is denying that there were high temperatures on 911!

But you claim that RJ Lee casually admit that they knew that it wasnt just high temperatures that were reached, impossible temperatures were reached and therefore they KNOW that it had to be an inside job. Isnt it interesting how blase they they are about it and none of them have followed up this report and no one apart from truthers has noticed this apparently "obvious" ground breaking research that - according to you - literally says that impossible temperatures were there on 911 that can only be explained by some kind of exotic incendiary, like thermite.
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
Actually it's you. You ignore their explanation.

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Nope, It's you. you simply can't understand the way the sentence is worded. Unreal how pathetic that is. Lets call a neutral person in on this discussion and ask them to tell us what that sentence means.. Limitless is bang on Chris7
 
superlogicalthinker said:
The iron spheres would not have been in the abundance they were. 6% of the dust is way too high and Chris Mohr agrees with us.
Click to expand...

No offense against Chris Mohr, he's a good guy, but he's admitted time and again that he has no expertise to say anything about the dust amount, or make up of it. That's why he organized the testing on the dust to get done. So, I don't really get what you were trying to say with this statement. I'm sure it was nonsensical though.
 
superlogicalthinker said:
.

Considering high temperatures Chris. Considering high temperatures.
Click to expand...

It's like talking to a child that knows they're wrong, they have nothing else they can possibly do to alter the results so they stick their fingers in their ears and say "la la la la la."
 
Last edited:
Jones also stated that molten steel found in the rubble was evidence of explosives, as an ordinary airplane fire would not generate enough heat to produce this, citing photographs of red debris being removed by construction equipment, but Blanchard stated that if there had been any molten steel in the rubble any excavation equipment encountering it would have been immediately damaged.[88] Other sampling of the pulverized dust by United States Geological Survey and RJ Lee did not report any evidence of thermite or explosives. It has been theorized the "thermite material" found was primer paint
Click to expand...

Just a little something I found.
 
superlogicalthinker said:
Thanks for admitting the first part Chris. But please tell me how they could possibly have hypothesized that when it had never happened in history.

if it had never happened, where would the idea come from.

Don't come back at me with some lame excuse of how eventors event new ideas all the time. just answer my question please.

Thanks.
Click to expand...

Because they saw a dangerous situation getting worse. Can you prove otherwise, with sworn testimony, affidavits, paper trails, anything besides Your Incredulity?
 
Last edited:
superlogicalthinker said:
.

Considering high temperatures Chris. Considering high temperatures.
Click to expand...

Jones debunks you.
occurring at approximately 430 °C
Click to expand...
From the fraud Jones paper.

The thermite burned at 430 C, office fires can exceed 1000 C.

Your own leaders debunk you. What temperature is high? We need a number from the paper. Go ahead, what number does RJ Lee or the USGS give us.

superlogicalthinker said:
Considering high temperatures. They mean in excess of at least 2800F. And ya know it.
Click to expand...
You make up a number like 911 truth makes up the lies you like because you don't understand anything.
 
Last edited:
superlogicalthinker said:
What do you not understand about this? Are you that daft man?

Considering the high temperatures reached during the destruction of
the WTC, this right here rest Beechers argument about the Event having clean up involved. OVER!!!!!


the following three types of combustion products would be expected to be present in WTC Dust.

Pretty clear. But not to JREFers. why????
Click to expand...

Perhaps you should address Beachnut by some actual variation of his name. Instead of Beechers.
Click to expand...
 
superlogicalthinker said:
Thanks for admitting the first part Chris. But please tell me how they could possibly have hypothesized that when it had never happened in history.

if it had never happened, where would the idea come from.

Don't come back at me with some lame excuse of how eventors event new ideas all the time. just answer my question please.

Thanks.
Click to expand...

Steel has been failing in fires for many years. It's common knowledge to firefighters.
 
Edx said:
Expected high temperatures. :rolleyes: Of course there was high temperatures on 911.
Click to expand...
Source?

However, in no way at all do they imply that there was impossible temperature on 911
Click to expand...
What part of "iron melted" don't you understand?

How many times are you going to repeat this?
They said that the iron micropsheres were expected,
Click to expand...
Considering the high temperatures i.e. hot enough to melt iron.

In their follow up report in 2004 they said:
The presence of lead oxide on the surface of mineral wool indicate the existence of extremely high temperatures during the collapse

BTW: There is no data for iron spheres being created by steel framework banging together given in this thread, just opinions based on speculation. It has not been established that fly ash was used in the concrete or the amount of iron spheres the concrete would contain if it was.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom