Dragon Family lawsuit against the United Nations

[Craig4]

"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." -- David Rockefeller - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Rockefeller

So for you, context is just something that happens to other people.

 

[Craig4]

The existence of the Dragon Family may have to be revealed for the lawsuit to be able to continue? And there is at least a lot of indication of mind control being real. Maybe even public evidence but I haven't researched that much.

Okay, I really need you to buckle down here and focus because we've gone over this before to no effect. This time I really want this point to sink in. I'm sure you can grasp it if you really work at it. If it ends in a question mark, it's not evidence. Once again and really focus here, interrogatives aren't evidence. So how about you run along and try to find something the supports this idea and this is the key bit, isn't a question?

 

[Anders Lindman]

So for you, context is just something that happens to other people.

The quote looks self-contained to me. Are you saying it's not?

 

[Anders Lindman]

Okay, I really need you to buckle down here and focus because we've gone over this before to no effect. This time I really want this point to sink in. I'm sure you can grasp it if you really work at it. If it ends in a question mark, it's not evidence. Once again and really focus here, interrogatives aren't evidence. So how about you run along and try to find something the supports this idea and this is the key bit, isn't a question?

The question mark is kind of a hint for others to do the research for me.

 

[Mojo]

The quote looks self-contained to me. Are you saying it's not?

No, he's saying that it doesn't say what you claim it does.

 

[Craig4]

The quote looks self-contained to me. Are you saying it's not?

No I'm saying you don't understand what he was talking about. In truth it was a slam against the whack job CT'ers that have plagued his family for years. Essentially what he was saying was that he was pro UN and pro trade.

 

[Anders Lindman]

No, he's saying that it doesn't say what you claim it does.

In what way?

 

[Craig4]

The question mark is kind of a hint for others to do the research for me.

Your ideas aren't worth the effort.

 

[Anders Lindman]

No I'm saying you don't understand what he was talking about. In truth it was a slam against the whack job CT'ers that have plagued his family for years. Essentially what he was saying was that he was pro UN and pro trade.

Well, the UN and public trade agreements are not secret, now are they? Sounds like you are trying to come up with a contrived interpretation to avoid accepting what Rockefeller said.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Your ideas aren't worth the effort.

And yet, you want me to make the effort? Talk about Machiavellian strategy.

 

[Tomtomkent]

And yet, you want me to make the effort? Talk about Machiavellian strategy.

Erm, you realise you are the one who wants to have this conversation? Who started the conversation? This is how it works:
You claim something.
We point out why we don't believe it.
You either apologise for wasting our time, or support your position with evidence.

How did you think this works?

 

[Anders Lindman]

Erm, you realise you are the one who wants to have this conversation? Who started the conversation? This is how it works:
You claim something.
We point out why we don't believe it.
You either apologise for wasting our time, or support your position with evidence.

How did you think this works?

It works the way I make it work.

 

[Mojo]

And yet, you want me to make the effort?

Yes. You could start by demonstrating that you are not under the cabal's mind control.

 

[Craig4]

Well, the UN and public trade agreements are not secret, now are they? Sounds like you are trying to come up with a contrived interpretation to avoid accepting what Rockefeller said.

If anyone else comes to that conclusion here I'll gladly defend my position.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Yes. You could start by demonstrating that you are not under the cabal's mind control.

Why?

 

[Anders Lindman]

If anyone else comes to that conclusion here I'll gladly defend my position.

So you are not ready to defend your position yet?

 

[R.A.F.]

It works the way I make it work.

Posting "because I say so" is beyond irrelevant...

 

[Mojo]

Why?

Because while you have denied that this is the case, you have provided no evidence to support this assertion, and everything you have posted on the forum is consistent with your being under their control.

And let's face it, if you are under their control you are hardly a reliable source of information about them. Unless you can demonstrate that you are not under the cabal's control there is no reason to take anything you post about them seriously.

 

[Craig4]

So you are not ready to defend your position yet?

I don't see how any rational person would draw the same conclusion about my comment as you. You are of course free to intuit whatever you like about the above sentence.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Posting "because I say so" is beyond irrelevant...

I have already pointed out that I'm always one step ahead of y'all.