• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Larry Silverstein explaining what he meant by 'pull it'

In the interest of further investigation using the latest forensic techniques, I am applying the fascinating methodology revealed in this thread to search for additional hidden meanings in Silverstein's quote:

"I said, you know, we've had such a terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it."

The first four words "I said, you know" are merely an introduction of sorts, so we can omit them for now. The remaining quote has exactly 64 letters, perfect for arranging in an 8 by 8 grid. Following the Genesis Seal method, we fill the words into the grid in a counterclockwise spiral, spiraling inward. (For details on why we do this instead of any of a hundred other ways to fill in the letters, see Kingfisher's posts in the above-linked thread. I'm sure he explains that somewhere.)

S O L E L B I R
S S E T R A M R
O T O T S I S E
F T P T I O E T
L H U L L D H H
I I N G T O T C
F E M A Y B E U
W E V E H A D S


Now, by searching within the grid, we reveal the words hidden within Silverstein's quote:

OSS (appears twice) -- American intelligence agency
LIME -- quicklime, a chemical used to destroy evidence
LAST -- the B next to the starting L creates a juxtaposition the words LAST and BLAST; the building was supposed to last but it was destroyed by explosives
SILTY -- condition of harbor after demolition rubble falls into it
TOSS -- out the Constitution
TRAM -- ple on our rights
TUG -- another word meaning "pull"
HOST -- another juxtaposition of similar words with opposite meanings, HOST and HOST-L (hostile); a hostile host suggests an inside job
TOTO -- clearly we're not in Kansas any more
AYGUTO -- when spoken aloud, eerily similar to the Japanese word for 'thank you' (arigato); Japanese collusion in the conspiracy? Or an ironic reference to Pearl Harbor?
FEMA -- say no more!

The presence of so many 9/11-related clues cannot be mere coincidence. But the patterns don't stop there. There are pictorial meanings as well. The Silverstein Seal (as I call it) is a literal map of the 9/11 conspiracy, once you figure out the codes! Consider, for example, the "towers" of stacked letter T's (for "tower" or "twin tower") near the upper left corner. The left tower is shorter, but that might be because its top is shrouded in "smoke", the letter S, which connects to more S's rising like smoke to the upper left corner. So this is a picture of Ground Zero after the first plane impact.

But there's still more. These towers rest on HULL (a container, as in "containing" the secret information?) which rests on ING (a bank!) which in turn rests on FEMA. Could the meaning be any clearer? And "LIME," representing buried destroyed evidence, cuts diagonally across all those "underground" layers.

I have not yet fully decoded the right half of the Silverstein Seal, which might need further manipulation to reveal all its meaning (again, see the linked thread for examples). I think a lot more will be revealed by replacing the letters with low numbers based on some flimsy pretext some clear simple rule and then looking for more patterns. But one thing is clear: the quote could not have been casual or off the cuff, to encode so much hidden information. It can only have been carefully crafted by a supreme being who also wrote the Book of Genesis.

So, Silverstein might have a lot more to answer for than just 9/11. This evidence should change the way we view the Great Flood, the sabotage of the Tower of Babel project (what is it with this guy and tall buildings anyway???), and Sodom and Gomorrah.

Respectfully,
Myriad

Hey,..... Here's a real ten dollar bet for you. If someone was to drop this into ATS or Infowars, it would be taken seriously. Within the year, we'd be seeing it on chain emails and some drooling halfwit would be in Auckland or Toronto or Stockholm handing out copies of it to show the sheeple The TruthTM
 
It never matters what anyone says or didn't say. There were many newscasters including Peter Jennings who reported explosions.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/20933...ene_cruz_survives_explosions_in_wtc_basement/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bjezhp0rL3M

And what are we told today? We're told there were no explosions.

Explain this then.

"Sounded like bombs" –Keith Murphy
"A huge explosion" –Gerard Gorman
"Sound of popping and exploding" –Alwish Monchery
"Sounded like explosions." –Anthony Fitzgerald
"Sounded like explosions" –Wilfred Barriere

Most conspiracy theorists like to point out quotes like this as the "smoking guns" for explosions. Do you know what these people were really talking about? Bodies falling from the tower and hitting the ground.
 
Explain this then.

"Sounded like bombs" –Keith Murphy
"A huge explosion" –Gerard Gorman
"Sound of popping and exploding" –Alwish Monchery
"Sounded like explosions." –Anthony Fitzgerald
"Sounded like explosions" –Wilfred Barriere

Most conspiracy theorists like to point out quotes like this as the "smoking guns" for explosions. Do you know what these people were really talking about? Bodies falling from the tower and hitting the ground.

Do you have a source? I recall reading\hearing that those individuals were in the sub basements. With the concrete above I wouldn't think they'd be able to hear the sound of the fallen.
 
Do you have a source? I recall reading\hearing that those individuals were in the sub basements. With the concrete above I wouldn't think they'd be able to hear the sound of the fallen.

Per Mark Robert's page (from where the quotes were taken) these were the quotes of WTC First Responders. More
 
Excellent, thank you sir. I must have missed that. Duly noted.

No worries. And may I apologize for not including the link in my first post regarding the situation. I was just in a rush and very excited to see how the "twoofers" explain this one. :cool:
 
No worries. And may I apologize for not including the link in my first post regarding the situation. I was just in a rush and very excited to see how the "twoofers" explain this one. :cool:

Be weary, they don't explain things too much. They do, however, ignore it completely and derail a thread. Stay tuned, ergo, MM, and Superlogicalthinker (don't ask how he got that name, it's mind boggling) should be able to take this one right off course in T minus...
 
Something that always bugged me about this: he leads into the famous quote talking about a loss of life. That would seem to exclude talk of demolition on its own since demolishing the building is not connected to saving lives. Pulling the firefighters out would be.

How hard is this, really?
 
Something that always bugged me about this: he leads into the famous quote talking about a loss of life. That would seem to exclude talk of demolition on its own since demolishing the building is not connected to saving lives. Pulling the firefighters out would be.

How hard is this, really?

And honestly, why would it even matter if it was demolished or not? I know this might sound ludicrous, but think about it. The building wasn't going to be saved, that much was known.

1) No one was killed in the collapse

2) The building was not going to be saved

3) You would have to win some form of award for planting explosives in the building while it's on fire and about to go down

4) They didn't "destroy" anything as all the information for every company that was in the building was backed up, or recoverable on some level

I don't think it was demolished by any means, but unlike WTC 1 & 2, the only real loss would be financial. It wouldn't be the horrible loss of life that was experienced during the previous tragedy.
 
Last edited:
Something that always bugged me about this: he leads into the famous quote talking about a loss of life. That would seem to exclude talk of demolition on its own since demolishing the building is not connected to saving lives. Pulling the firefighters out would be.

How hard is this, really?

Pulling the firefighters out of what? It's been explained ad nauseum that there was no firefighting operation in 7.
 
Pulling the firefighters out of what? It's been explained ad nauseum that there was no firefighting operation in 7.

Call me Captain Obvious but they could have been looking for survivors, or studying the structure of the building to see if it would stay standing, etc.
 
No worries. And may I apologize for not including the link in my first post regarding the situation. I was just in a rush and very excited to see how the "twoofers" explain this one. :cool:
They typically refrain from explaining things that don't fit their retarded ideas.
 
Call me Captain Obvious but they could have been looking for survivors, or studying the structure of the building to see if it would stay standing, etc.
Correct, as per NIST:

At approximately, 2:30 p.m., FDNY officers decided to completely abandon WTC 7, and the final order was given to evacuate the site around the building. 395, 396 The order terminated the ongoing rescue operations at WTC 6 and on the rubble pile of WTC 1. Firefighters and other emergency responders were withdrawn from the WTC 7 area, and the building continued to burn. At approximately 5:20 p.m., some three hours after WTC 7 was abandoned the building experienced a catastrophic failure and collapsed.
 
They typically refrain from explaining things that don't fit their retarded ideas.

Because it doesn't fit their agenda. Like I've said before, "twoofers" venture into an area where they don't accept tangible evidence. Why don't they accept this evidence? Because it disproves their ideas. It's also hard to shallow your pride and admit you're wrong, which "twoofers" refuse to do.

And next time someone tries to make the claim that "patriots" like Alex Jones are doing the right thing by exposing the people "behind 9/11", ask that person why Alex Jones believes the FDNY is guilty of manslaughter, and thus, obviously "in" on the whole operation.
 
I found a couple of suspicious statements in the comments section of MacMurray Hatchery:

"We ordered two pullets, and they are the nicest birds ever! They love people and are the friendliest of our flock. They are the prettiest birds ever, black with a green and purple sheen." link

"We ordered two pullets this spring. They are gorgeous and could not be more different. One is a 'Harry Potter' chicken., She looks just like Buckbeak. She is a rare color, silver duckwing. The other looks just like a pheasant. She's very friendly and comes running up to the gate. They started laying at 5 months old, just days apart. They lay blue eggs or blue with a green tint." link
 
I bet Jesse Ventura thought Andre the Giant was killed by a preemptive strike.
 
Pulling the firefighters out of what? It's been explained ad nauseum that there was no firefighting operation in 7.

That is a complete and utter falsehood. Even if one were to suggest that the only thing that firefighters do is fight fires, the FDNY did that for at least a short while on 911 on 911. But of course that is not all they do. It is undisputed that fire personnel were in wtc7 long after the towers collapses. Further, Nigro said very clearly that the firefighters were pulled back out of the collapse zone.

We are long beyond the point of expecting answers from you, Red, but at least for god's sake try to avoid polluting the freaking thread with falsehoods
 

Back
Top Bottom