Merged "Iron-rich spheres" - scienctific explanation?

Both explosives and incediaries played a role in the destruction of the twin towers. Why is it you guys only talk about thermite?
Click to expand...

Actually, neither was. Explosives even less likely because all reports of explosions took place well before collapse. Surely you're not implying that your hush-a-boom explosives are also equipped with a delayed destruction feature?

RJ Lee Group report 2004:

"iron and lead were melted during the WTC Event, producing spherical metallic particles."
Click to expand...

Expected. YOUR OWN SOURCE says that everything was expected. So they're dead-on when it suits you, but complete idiots when it doesn't. Sound about right?

Typical.
 
chrismohr said:
Whoah gang,
I've seen a couple people now go after 9/11 Truth activists by saying they are making debating points over the dying, or don't care about the deaths on 9/11. NOT FAIR. We all put our thinking caps on and debate technical points, but let's be good Buddhists here and assume good intent at least. I haven't met anyone on JREF ever on either side who indicated they never cared a whit about the tragic loss of life that day. We certainly disagree on who the killers were, but not that it was an awful loss of life.
Click to expand...
Vicsims.
 
"iron and lead were melted during the WTC Event, producing spherical metallic particles."
Click to expand...

Do you have this on a t-shirt? I'm pretty sure I've seen you use this 1 line in at least 5-6 different posts.

Also, I see you say that multiple demolition items were used but you never seem to back that up at all. Once again, Brian Boitano, you are figure skating around the evidence and twisting it to what you want it to be.
 
NoahFence said:
Actually, neither was. Explosives even less likely because all reports of explosions took place well before collapse. Surely you're not implying that your hush-a-boom explosives are also equipped with a delayed destruction feature?



Expected. YOUR OWN SOURCE says that everything was expected. So they're dead-on when it suits you, but complete idiots when it doesn't. Sound about right?

Typical.
Click to expand...

Nope. Not expected in the abundance it was. nope

Big fail. Big one.
 
NoahFence said:
Actually, neither was. Explosives even less likely because all reports of explosions took place well before collapse. Surely you're not implying that your hush-a-boom explosives are also equipped with a delayed destruction feature?



Expected. YOUR OWN SOURCE says that everything was expected. So they're dead-on when it suits you, but complete idiots when it doesn't. Sound about right?

Typical.
Click to expand...

Interesting.....out of that whole page of me handing Bararash (or whoever whatever) his butt, thats all you took.
 
superlogicalthinker said:
Nope. Not expected in the abundance it was. nope

Big fail. Big one.
Click to expand...

Could have sworn those goalpoasts were around here somewhere.


See kiddo - there's one thing missing from your "theories".

It's pretty major. It pretty much makes all you people's retarded arguments moot.

Explosives of ANY kind cannot survive the aircraft impacts.
Period.

Therefore, no explosives. This is the single easiest conspiracy theory EVER to debunk. The easiest one. That's why it's also the most stupid. Even a drooling, brain damaged salamander can figure out that you're wrong.
 
superlogicalthinker said:
Interesting.....out of that whole page of me handing Bararash (or whoever whatever) his butt, thats all you took.
Click to expand...

You are very, very self centered and have an extremely high opinion of yourself, which gives you arrogance, which encourages people to ignore you.

The only thing you've been handing out on this thread is a gigantic plate load of ignorance, coupled with lies attempting to create a fabrication of you want to have happened.

The only person that thinks you've made any good points at all is you, everyone else is laughing at you. Literally
 
chrismohr said:
Whoah gang,
I've seen a couple people now go after 9/11 Truth activists by saying they are making debating points over the dying, or don't care about the deaths on 9/11. NOT FAIR. We all put our thinking caps on and debate technical points, but let's be good Buddhists here and assume good intent at least. I haven't met anyone on JREF ever on either side who indicated they never cared a whit about the tragic loss of life that day. We certainly disagree on who the killers were, but not that it was an awful loss of life.
Click to expand...

Chris,

You said this yesterday:

"But I have not seen any response to this post from SLT or MM or others. I challenge you to look carefully at what he says and acknowledge or carefully rebut what he has written. It is clear enough for a layperson like me to understand."

I posted this.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7972915&postcount=367

I have not seen anyone counter it yet.
 
superlogicalthinker said:
Chris,

You said this yesterday:

"But I have not seen any response to this post from SLT or MM or others. I challenge you to look carefully at what he says and acknowledge or carefully rebut what he has written. It is clear enough for a layperson like me to understand."

I posted this.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7972915&postcount=367

I have not seen anyone counter it yet.
Click to expand...

Grow up, there are threads full of questions you haven't answered. Tip for tap, answer one of the hundreds of questions posed to you and you'll receive an answer.

Or are you still under the arrogant, ignorant ideal that the world revolves around you and only you.

Only child?
 
plague311 said:
You are very, very self centered and have an extremely high opinion of yourself, which gives you arrogance, which encourages people to ignore you.

The only thing you've been handing out on this thread is a gigantic plate load of ignorance, coupled with lies attempting to create a fabrication of you want to have happened.

The only person that thinks you've made any good points at all is you, everyone else is laughing at you. Literally
Click to expand...

Isn't there something in the code of conduct about talking to people like this?
 
plague311 said:
Grow up, there are threads full of questions you haven't answered. Tip for tap, answer one of the hundreds of questions posed to you and you'll receive an answer.
Click to expand...

show me I have avoided 100 questions and I will answer all of them!!!!

Or are you still under the arrogant, ignorant ideal that the world revolves around you and only you.
Click to expand...

This is an agressive comment which make me feel violated:blush: LOL


Read Chris's request sunshine. He asked for my response. I think it's a good one. Chris and I have been cool with each other, so incase he missed it, I made him aware.
Click to expand...
 
superlogicalthinker said:
your the one cryin bud :p....see ya tonight!!!!!
Click to expand...

It's you're, and I am not crying at all or pleading to see if the "rules" will regulate being called out for the person I am.

I also could not possibly care less what terms you and Chris are on, I call you as I see you and that's how I see you.
 
superlogicalthinker said:
Chris,

You said this yesterday:

"But I have not seen any response to this post from SLT or MM or others. I challenge you to look carefully at what he says and acknowledge or carefully rebut what he has written. It is clear enough for a layperson like me to understand."

I posted this.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7972915&postcount=367

I have not seen anyone counter it yet.
Click to expand...

You googled a bunch of words you don't understand.
 
...and won't even entertain the thought of how explosives survived in the first place.

...or how the Pentagon and Shanksville is connected.

Easiest debunk EVER = 9/11 conspiracies.
 
chrismohr said:
Ooops my bad... I was quoting a "debunker" in the first section, then chris7 in the second section of my post (bad labeling on my part). I was just using these two posts as examples of how people from both sides are quoting RJ Lee, and we're not getting answers from them to clarify certain things they said. I never said anything about their competence; that was a quote I lifted from someone else.
Click to expand...
They were perfectly clear. Iron melted and lead was vaporized during the event and the dust was deposited by the dust clouds from the collapses.
 
superlogicalthinker said:
Chris,

You said this yesterday:

"But I have not seen any response to this post from SLT or MM or others. I challenge you to look carefully at what he says and acknowledge or carefully rebut what he has written. It is clear enough for a layperson like me to understand."

I posted this.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7972915&postcount=367

I have not seen anyone counter it yet.
Click to expand...


You offered nothing to counter in that post. You merely pointed out that certain sintering operations (of metal powders, an entirely different class of materials) carried out industrially under controlled conditions to achieve ideal results are performed under different conditions than occurred in the Ground Zero fires. This is obvious and irrelevant.

Unless, perhaps, you are claiming that sintering can only occur under those conditions described in your quote. That would be like claiming that since fires are normally lit in stoves and fireplaces equipped with chimneys, any claim of fire in a place without a chimney is now "debunked." I trust you see how silly such a claim would be.

Let's look at this a different way: Suppose you mixed some crushed concrete with 10% by weight crushed glass. Pile it up, with a stainless steel gun in the middle of the pile, and heat the pile to 1150°F. Leave it that way for 48 hours, then let it cool. What would you expect to happen to the material?

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom