Merged "Iron-rich spheres" - scienctific explanation?

I will present the argument that a single column failure cannot lead to the entire collapse of the building.

Then after you defeat the mighty debunkers, maybe you could take this earth-shattering information to a major engineering, news media, or law enforcement organization, because right now they don't seem too interested.
 
Last edited:
Don't know, maybe he tells us in the videos but I cant speak Norwegian.

There was far more metals than just aluminium in the towers, bear in mind. So it wouldnt have been pure aluminium. Its also possible it could be a camera white balance problem having issues with the intense light from the reaction, since it isnt mentioned at all in the article when they describe it "Melting looking at the video footage is light at the top, and go on to become gray. This is a typical situation if you have liquid aluminum at 900 degrees, and takes it down to the melting point of 660 degrees, says Simensen."

Point is, it explodes and creates a shower of glowing melted metal

Where did the water come from on 9/11? Sprinklers? I know they shut off in 7 but what about the towers?
 
Then after you defeat the mighty debunkers, maybe you could take this earth-shattering information to a major engineering, news media, or law enforcement organization, because right now they don't seem too interested.

The CIA owns the media dude. ever heard of William Colbey?
 
As I said earlier I watch all your stuff. I happen to have inside knowledge,

Delusions of grandeur, too?

I will present the argument that a single column failure could not have lead to the entire collapse of the building.

Challenge.

Do you never feel the emotion of embarassment? That would explain a lot.
 
Where did the water come from on 9/11? Sprinklers? I know they shut off in 7 but what about the towers?

Unfortunately the original link to this article seems to be gone and web archive doesnt have a copy, but this is a quote from Mike Pecoraro who was in the sub basement, this is what he said he saw in the the Lobby.

"...Broken glass everywhere, the revolving doors were all broken and their glass was gone. Every sprinkler head was going off. I am thinking to myself, how are these sprinkler heads going off? It takes a lot of heat to set off a sprinkler head.It never dawned on me that there was a giant fireball that came through the air of the lobby. I never knew that until later on. The jet fuel actually came down the elevator shaft, blew off all the (elevator) doors and flames rolled through the lobby. That explained all the burnt people and why everything was sooted in the lobby.""

So it appears these sprinkers were working at least.
 
Unfortunately the original link to this article seems to be gone and web archive doesnt have a copy, but this is a quote from Mike Pecoraro who was in the sub basement, this is what he said he saw in the the Lobby.



So it appears these sprinkers were working at least.

In the lobby. There is also reports of explosions in the basments from construction workers.
 
.

No you can't. You can speculate such a thing but cannot assure anything.
I sincerely thank you for taking time to write your opinion using English words.

But there is documented evidence of molten iron.

"iron and lead were MELTED during the WTC Event" and this, in turn, "produced spherical metallic particles."

Actually, documented evidence of molten iron would include thermal and viscosity analysis of a material we already know to be iron. A statement that the iron microspheres come from molten iron is not sufficient to prove that the presence of molten iron is certain when iron microspheres are seen. That logic is indicative of the classic non sequitur fallacy because it follows this structure:

Molten iron produces iron microspheres

I have iron microspheres

Therefore I have molten iron

I would suggest that you reformulate your argument to avoid such logical inconsistencies in the future.

You keep leaving the part out that the spheres we are talking about had melted. Molten iron spheres are the bi product of a themitic reaction.

Such iron spheres undoubtedly are, but they are also the product of dozens of other, non-thermite based processes. You cannot conclude the presence of thermite from the product of multiple causes. See Hume's refutation of Thomas Aquinas's comosological argument for more details.
Iron rich spheres and formerly molten iron rich spheres are two very different things.
And how do you propose you determine the difference between those produced by thermite and those produced by ordinary fires? I would be most interested in reading your NSF proposal, if you can take the time out of your busy lecture/research schedule.
 
In the lobby. There is also reports of explosions in the basments from construction workers.

Mike was in the 6th sub basement.

The fireballs from the jet fuel caused explosions, thats why he and others reported smelling jet fuel.
 
Last edited:
As I said earlier I watch all your stuff. I happen to have inside knowledge, that a few truthers are working on refuting you. Last I heard they were through about 15 of your videos. They wish to wait until all are complete before they surface on You Tube.

Anyway, I would like to challenge you to a new thread I want to open. I wish to propose a debate with you (and everyone) on the free fall acceleration of WTC 7. In your video, you basically cite the NIST report saying that all the columns fell inside first and then the exterior shell fell at free fall. That is am impossability.

I will present the argument that a single column failure could not have lead to the entire collapse of the building.

Challenge.

Covered in this thread.
 

Back
Top Bottom