Merged Evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth - (Part 2)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am very sad to have to break this to you, but you are both wrong. The right words can be found in old, very very vey old, anciently old ancient Sworse: "Ha ha ha hi hi hi, jag hör vad ni säger men det skiter jag i"*. Sir Luke Ramsey-Ross would agree that these are the right words. The evidence for why these words are the right words, is of course that they can be found on rune stones all over Scandinavia. No one would ever have gone to the trouble of carving them on stones if they were not the right words, now would they? They would just have waited until someone invented paper, which would have made it so much easier.

Runestones are why Scandinavians invented the rucksack, by the way, since the stones are far to big to keep in your back pocket. AND runestones are often signed.

*I would have translated the words for you, but since English doesn't have the vowels å, ä and ö, I can't.

Well, you've got me th...hey, wait a minute! The Runic alphabets didn't include any of those wacky vowels either, and the Younger Futhark didn't have anywhere near enough symbols to represent all the sounds of old, very, very, very old, anciently old ancient sworse. You're trying to trick us! Anyway, everyone knows the Bible was written in King James English. As it says in the gospels, Hey la day la, my Savior's back.
 
I suppose he was when he was newborn.

Dave
OK, but I'd only count a state after he was capable of reasoned thought.

I can't reject the notion. Sometimes when a person switches "sides" they become ardent evangelists for their new-found "truth". The person who immediately comes to mind is the now far right advocate who, during his college days, was a true liberal. (I guess he doesn't really come to mind since I can't think of his name. :)).

Anyway, maybe DOC did have a come-to-Jesus moment and has now seen the light and feels the need to help all of us remaining slugs see the same light. Or he has to keep up this nonsense to keep convincing himself that his new TruthTM really is true.
Agreed. 'Converts Disease' is quite common, e.g. C. S. Lewis.
 
If someone dug up a scroll in Jerusalem that said, My name is Philip and I was an apostle and I saw Jesus raised from the dead, and the document was verified to be about 2000 years old, would you become a Christian.
If someone dug up a 300 year old letter from Salem, Massachusetts which stated, My name is Phyllis and I saw my neighbor Anne fly in the sky and turn Farmer Will into a squirrel, would you believe that Anne was a witch? Keep in mind that Phyllis is a Christian and has been commanded not to bear false witness against her neighbors.

Would you be so quick to accept an extraordinary claim from an essentially anonymous long-dead witness?
 
A man does not become an atheist and then change back again unless he/she has done so with no conviction in the first place.
 
Has DOC ever said he was once a Christian but fell away then later went back again?


Here's a teaser while I keep looking.


25 March 2009

Of course there is a reason that they don't appear concerned. It's for the exact same reason that you're not concerned. And that is: even if they know about it, by the time they found out, they were already totally committed to the christianity. The bible could say far worse things, (which it does) and they still wouldn't be bothered.

No matter how many inconsistencies, illogical or immoral things are in the bible, you are going to bend over backwards to give it the benefit of the doubt, just like you have been doing this entire thread. And that's because, you have no choice. You are emotionally committed.


Not really, I was an atheist in my early and mid 20's. I would say it's called looking at the big eternal picture. Although temporal issues are important, Christianity's main focus is the big picture and eternal life.
 
Here we go . . .


5 December 2008

DOC4248048 said:
VotGs said:
DOC,

I am one of those lurkers/readers you claim the JREF forum is trying to sway with 'empty posts'.

I was raised Christian, and left the faith--but most of my family is still in it. I am always interested in -new- information in the historicity of things in the Bible, as its a nice, relatively neutral topic to discuss with my family.

However, in the last two years since I joined this forum, I've noticed your threads over....and over....and over....and over....and over...again.

The first time I clicked on the last page of one to see what the arguments were, I -did- wonder if you had just gotten lost in your own argument, and they were being a little unfair. I know that people I care about who truly believe tend to have good points, though shaky logic/historical accuracy.

....and then I read from the beginning. I have, in fact, read -this- thread from the beginning, because it -claimed- to have new facts, the exact sort of thing I was interested, as I stated above.

I have followed your arguments, and the JREF arguments. Everytime this thread pops back up, I keep -hoping- for something that's solid. Something that will actually....make me question?

I am an open skeptic. I would have -loved- to have been convinced of God's love during my tour in Iraq. It failed to happen. I would have been thrilled to have been convinced of God's love when my father died suddenly two Thanksgivings ago. It failed to happen.

If God had reached out, this past year, during my nervous breakdown, I would have taken -that- with open arms, as I needed someone badly to help me out. It was neither God nor religion--it was the Veteran's Administration that helped me out.

And yet I do wander about, seeking more information. If I'm wrong about being an atheist, I'd love to know.

This thread stated that was its aim--to give actual evidence. I looked eagerly for it, and found -none-.

By this stage of the thread, JREFers are exhausted with your ephemerality...there's nothing solid in your arguments, nothing that belief -should- be built on. Even seekers such as myself, who hope for a nugget of -something- that they could build at least a comforting half-assed agnosticism out of....

Yeah, we get nothing out of your arguments. Nothing. I -am- the person you are supposedly reaching out to. All I ask is something -solid-, something -true-, something that I can have trust in....


Well thanks for your post. All I can say is keep on seeking. The bible says seek and ye shall find, knock and the door will open. And it says to be persistent at it too. For some people it just takes time. I've said this maybe twice in the last 2 years and that is I used to be an atheist when I was in my early to mid 20's. I even read a couple issues of Atheist magazine and can even remember telling someone that the bible is just a book written by 4 guys. I was raised Catholic but never really read the bible much.

Then one day when I was about 26. I was in a fleebag motel room watching TV and Kenneth Copeland came on TV. I couldn't tell you 2 words he said that day but I know something changed in that motel room and then I started to read the bible seriously for the first time. And it amazed me -- the words, there was a whole new world that opened up to me. It did not come overnight it was more of a process. Christian TV helped build my faith over time, whereas some people get more from church.

My advice would be to just keep reading the New testament especially the four gospels, Maybe watch Christian TV if its in your area. And remember I"m not perfect, I don't have all the answers, but I've looked at most of the world's philosophies and religions including the
Buddism and atheism and you know what won out. I've been in these threads for almost 2 years now and have had about 27 religious threads and my faith is still strong in spite of all the argumentative and personal attacks I've received. That in itself says something about the power of Christianity. As I've said many times I'm just putting info out there. I rarely talk about hell. Maybe once or twice in two years. What people do with the info I put out there is there business. But I do believe (and I'm not talking to you but to some of the others) there does come a time when it's too late, when there is no turning back. It's kind of like some of the transients you see on the street. There are some of them that are too far gone.

Give me that, and I'll return to church. But please, -quit- claiming that JREFers are trying to sway people like me.


Some, I do believe are trying to do that, especially the ones who continually personally attack me and my threads in posts without giving any reasoned explanation in that post.

It's you who are reaching out to the 'anonymous' and saying that we are too terrified of JREFers scarcasm to post in agreement with you.


I never said anything like that, although it might be true. But it might be best for someone new in Christianity not to face off against some of these people until you are strong, confident, and well read in your faith; as well as in other world philosophies. This might take many years to get to this level. But if you're a new Christian go with your gut, and God through the Holy spirit will give you wisdom if you seek it and pray about it.
 
Many thanks, Akhenaten.

I never heard of Kenneth Copeland before so I asked Prof. Wiki about him:

He is the founder of Kenneth Copeland Ministries, and known for teaching “prosperity gospel” which says that wealth is directly related to faith and sound financial practices.

Does that mean you're a gazillionaire, DOC?
 
Many thanks, Akhenaten.

I never heard of Kenneth Copeland before so I asked Prof. Wiki about him:



Does that mean you're a gazillionaire, DOC?

Typical televangelist. "Send me your money and Jeezus will multiply your generosity. :sdl:
 
I am very sad to have to break this to you, but you are both wrong. The right words can be found in old, very very vey old, anciently old ancient Sworse: "Ha ha ha hi hi hi, jag hör vad ni säger men det skiter jag i"*. Sir Luke Ramsey-Ross would agree that these are the right words. The evidence for why these words are the right words, is of course that they can be found on rune stones all over Scandinavia. No one would ever have gone to the trouble of carving them on stones if they were not the right words, now would they? They would just have waited until someone invented paper, which would have made it so much easier.

Runestones are why Scandinavians invented the rucksack, by the way, since the stones are far to big to keep in your back pocket. AND runestones are often signed.

*I would have translated the words for you, but since English doesn't have the vowels å, ä and ö, I can't.

Well, you've got me th...hey, wait a minute! The Runic alphabets didn't include any of those wacky vowels either, and the Younger Futhark didn't have anywhere near enough symbols to represent all the sounds of old, very, very, very old, anciently old ancient sworse. You're trying to trick us! Anyway, everyone knows the Bible was written in King James English. As it says in the gospels, Hey la day la, my Savior's back.
Lucian - you are quite correct. And everybody knows that, except in the Bible, no other language but American English counts. How do we know if those words even mean anything? They all sound so...foreign.

However, that is my signature, and I assure you my last name is not Rumpelstiltskin (see, there's another one of those foreign-sounding words again.)
 
Lucian - you are quite correct. And everybody knows that, except in the Bible, no other language but American English counts. How do we know if those words even mean anything? They all sound so...foreign.

However, that is my signature, and I assure you my last name is not Rumpelstiltskin (see, there's another one of those foreign-sounding words again.)


Rumplestrumpf, m'lady.

And I bring this to thy notice only that by such a bold (on my part) measure might I show that even eyes as bless'd as thine might sometimes misconstrue, and thus an error promulgate.
 
Lucian - you are quite correct. And everybody knows that, except in the Bible, no other language but American English counts. How do we know if those words even mean anything? They all sound so...foreign.

However, that is my signature, and I assure you my last name is not Rumpelstiltskin (see, there's another one of those foreign-sounding words again.)

You do understand that there aren't any other languages than American English, or as I like to call it "English". Everything else is a sham put on for the benefit of American Tourists so it feels like they've gone to a foreign country. For that, I say "thank you". It's an amazing feat to keep up that charade all this time.*




























*Some of this is not totally serious.**

**I've been in "Understatment 101" to fill in my general education courses.
 
You do understand that there aren't any other languages than American English, or as I like to call it "English". Everything else is a sham put on for the benefit of American Tourists so it feels like they've gone to a foreign country. For that, I say "thank you". It's an amazing feat to keep up that charade all this time.*




























*Some of this is not totally serious.**

**I've been in "Understatment 101" to fill in my general education courses.


I thought I heard a noise. Some kind of mumbly, almost human-sounding grunting . . .

Nah, just the wind, most likely.


;)
 
I thought I heard a noise. Some kind of mumbly, almost human-sounding grunting . . .

Nah, just the wind, most likely.


;)

What? My theory is supported by none other than that august of personages, Sir Ramsay Luke the Zealot! He would have written it down but was bereft of paper, which had been invented but sold out, so could only spout it on the street corners whilst carrying a sign that proudly proclaims "DUMB" (he's a non-prophet). He taught it to me after I taught him the Law of Fives.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom