Forgive the duplicate post...
And that is where rob's **** breaks down. His sheep bust out these long legal magic rituals, and it all gets stopped by a judge raising an eyebrow and giving a big old " Nooooooo....." to the ritual.
Dear sadhatter,
That (natural person philosophy) is not my ****, as a matter of fact I have had discussions with Russ where I opined that he was sadly and badly mistaken on his theories. I and many other Freemen reject his theories as flawed. Nor is he one of my ‘sheep’, for one I do not even have any, and for two, he rejected the whole Freeman position as I rejected his.
He has a SIN, and was filling in and submitting their forms and seeking their benefits. We feel we have a right of association, and therefore have a corresponding right to not associate, especially with a number.
For the record, a Freeman does not have a SIN, and does not fill out those forms, for we do not have accounts with Canada Revenue Agency, nor seek the benefits associated with the SIN’s.
If you were discussing religion as a Christian, you would be pointing to a Muslim and their actions or beliefs, and claiming that their beliefs and actions proved that a Buddhists were wrong. Porisky’s beliefs and FMOTL are diametrically opposed.
What you do prove however is how completely ignorant you actually are of FMOTL beliefs. Your inability to distinguish is apparent. Your grouping Russ Porisky’s beliefs with FMOTL philosophy proves it. You claiming that he is one of my ‘sheep’ only shows your disdain for anyone who does not believe as you do. Of course, that will not stop you or others here from labeling ours as false and claiming that your beliefs and yours alone are correct, just like so many mindless and ignorant Christians/Muslims/Jews do when referring to any other religion or belief besides their own.
At least Jon here had the ability and willingness to recognize that Russ did not use ANY FMOTL arguments. At all. Not a single one. To claim that his case had anything to do with FMOTL philosophy is akin to pointing to someone who tried and failed to eat a brick, and then pointing to someone actually eating an apple, and claiming they can’t eat the apple, because it is not the banana you prefer.
The only thing you have accomplished is to prove you have NO IDEA what the FMOTL position actually is, and commenting on it when you do not know it at all, merely highlights your incredible ignorance.
How can you reject something as false if you have no idea what it actually is?
Can you show me a case where someone who does not have a SIN was found guilty of failing to file? Can you show me a case where someone was ordered to submit an application for a SIN and ordered to associate themselves with that number? Thought not.
