• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth - (Part 2)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yep, basically the NT jumps the shark after the Crucifixion.
Fonzie (who jumped the shark), Happy Days, and the entrenched Roman and Greek gods are in the past, but Christianity is still very much a part of things. There is a reason for that.
 
Happy Days is very much still around. It's not being made, but nobody is writing a new Bible either (unless you're on Conservapedia)

The Roman and Greek gods are around exactly the same way that yours is. ie. not.
 
[...] but Christianity is still very much a part of things. There is a reason for that.


Yes. It's called indoctrination.

If you're going to imply that the very existence of Christianity today is evidence for the veracity of the New Testament, you will have to admit that:

- The existence of Judaism is evidence against the New Testament
- The existence of Islam is evidence for the Q'uran
- The existence of Hinduism is evidence for the Vedas
- etc etc etc.


Of course, if that isn't what you were implying, then I would very much like to know what you were trying to say and how it relates to the OP.
 
Fonzie (who jumped the shark), Happy Days, and the entrenched Roman and Greek gods are in the past, but Christianity is still very much a part of things. There is a reason for that.

As is Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc. People are afraid of death, what's new, so fricken what?
 
Fonzie (who jumped the shark), Happy Days, and the entrenched Roman and Greek gods are in the past, but Christianity is still very much a part of things. There is a reason for that.
:D This is the funniest thing I've read today.
As a fan of self-deprecating humor, I'm impressed.
 
There is a statue of the Fonz in Milwaukee.

There is a statue of Jesus in Rio.

Both seem to still be a part of things.

Any point, DOC?
 
Fonzie (who jumped the shark), Happy Days, and the entrenched Roman and Greek gods are in the past, but Christianity is still very much a part of things. There is a reason for that.

God, I love this thread! Where else can you find hard-hitting Fonzie/Jesus comparisons?

Can I get an AYYYY-men?
 
My DOC, my DOC, why hast thou forsaken me?

Am I not that thread upon which all thine other threads depend?

Return, oh DOC. Thine enemies abound and here I lie, abandoned to their cruel and wicked onslaughts.

No other can take thy place. Deny it no longer, oh my DOC.

Thou knowest it's all about thee!
 
DOC is collecting material he plans to use as to prove that the gospellers were writing the truth!
 
A possible reason why a perfect God does not overwhelm us with evidence.

It's back, the book "I Don't Have enough Faith to be an Atheist". Some of you will remember that book as the driving force behind my 2 year evidence thread entitled "Evidence why we know the New Testament Writers told the Truth".

It seems that that thread did not have enough evidence for many of you. But the authors of that book give a reason why God maybe does not overwhelm us with undeniable evidence. This reason is given in the paragraph nine lines down on page 31 from their book.

http://books.google.com/books?id=PC...sler Gives enough Evidence to believe&f=false
 
Last edited:
It's back, the book "I Don't Have enough Faith to be an Atheist". Some of you will remember that book as the driving force behind my 2 year evidence thread entitled "Evidence why we know the New Testament Writers told the Truth".

It seems that that thread did not have enough evidence for many of you. But the authors of that book give a reason why God maybe does not overwhelm us with undeniable evidence. This reason is given in the first full paragraph on page 31 from their book.

http://books.google.com/books?id=PC...sler Gives enough Evidence to believe&f=false
I don't want or need to be overwhelmed with evidence, a simple "miracle" that couldn't be performed by anything but a god would do fine.

You trying to make money selling books now? Why don't you simply post the the first full paragraph? Go ahead, overwhelm us with undeniable evidence.

A probable (to the point of being virtually assured) reason why a perfect God does not overwhelm us with evidence - No such thing exists (God and therefore evidence).
 
Last edited:
The paragraph says "There's lots of evidence. It's enough to convince anyone willing to believe. But there's no proof, because we're supposed to make the choice ourselves."

Still nonsense.
 
I don't want or need to be overwhelmed with evidence, a simple "miracle" that couldn't be performed by anything but a god would do fine.

Then you want God to perform a miracle for each and every generation, every 20 years or so, so that each generation will love him because of the miracle.

You trying to make money selling books now? Why don't you simply post the the first full paragraph? Go ahead, overwhelm us with undeniable evidence.
Actually it can't be cut and pasted from that site. And I haven't made a penny off that book, and I don't know the authors.
 
The paragraph says "There's lots of evidence. It's enough to convince anyone willing to believe. But there's no proof, because we're supposed to make the choice ourselves."

Still nonsense.

Do you believe in the Big Bang and life from non-life? Do you have undeniable proof for those beliefs or just evidence?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom