In Scotland it's about on a level with "good morning".
That doesn't explain its absence given the same can be said for almost all the other words on the list.I suspect it is because both "cock" and "prick" are only expletives in certain contexts and can be used for very inoffensive purposes, although cocking a weapon might actually be more offensive, if you take my meaning![]()
OH, never mind.I think you've misunderstood my argument.
The OP said: "Is it because it refers to that part of a woman that should never be referred to? Isn't that a terribly misogynistic Victorian attitude that has no place in the civilised modern world?".
I was demonstrating that the reason for the c word's perceived offensiveness cannot be merely because of this because there are other words for the same thing that AREN'T seen in this way.
I wasn't saying "using the c word isn't misogynistic". I was saying "taking offense to the c word isn't misogynistic".
Perhaps the way some in the black community use the n word referring to each other in a friendly way, women could also take the negativity out of the c word by using it more often but in a different context.There is sexism in language, it does enhance the position of males, and males have had control over the production of cultural forms. (Spender 1985: 144)
This, Spender claims, provides circumstantial evidence that ‘males have encoded sexism into language to consolidate their claims of male supremacy’ (Spender 1985: 144)....
...Spender and others also suggest that the maleness of language constrains thought, imposing a male worldview on all of us, and making alternative visions of reality impossible, or at least very difficult to articulate. These arguments often draw upon the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis (Sapir 1949; Whorf 1976). This is generally described as roughly the hypothesis that “our worldview is determined by the structures of the particular language that we happen to speak” (Cameron 1998b: 150).
Some suggest that male power over language allows men to shape not just thought, but also reality....
...Instead, we must aim to create a new reality more congenial to women. Some feminists have argued that the only way to achieve this is for women to create their own language, either by redefining terms already in use, or by inventing a new language, with new words and new rules. Only in this way, they suggest, will women be able to break free from the constraints of male language and male thought, to articulate a competing vision for the world, and to work toward it (Daly and Caputi 1987, Elgin 1985, MacKinnon 1989, Penelope 1990, Spender 1985). Lynne Tirrell offers an especially sophisticated and complex discussion of this idea in her “Definition and Power: Toward Authority Without Privilege” (1993).
Exactly what is it that makes the C word any worse than any other word? To quote George Carlin, "There are no bad words. There are bad thoughts, bad ideas... and words."
I lol'ed at that. Add Australia to the list, too. Seems like it's synonymous with "mate" there.it's not considered more unpleasant everywhere. In england it's about on a level with the f word. In Scotland it's about on a level with "good morning".
There was considerable offence expressed when Jeremy Hunt, Culture Secretary was spoonerised.
Was there? You may be right, but I didn't hear any, only amusement.
Which "C Word"?
There are more than one.