Ron Paul and the 9/11 Truth

Rand is worse!

I agree. Rand is strange guy, as well. Like father, like son.

This thread is weird. :con2:

Not any weirder than most of the threads here. Conspiracy theorist either hasn't read the other posts properly or suffers from some powerful issues with their reading ability. They start posting and the thread degenerates from an adult discussion into a kind of childish question & answer where the same questions get asked over and over and over again. I think this is the Truther version of a trick question.
 
Marfoot is a truther? He doesn't think Ron Paul is a truther though. I agree.

Then we have Scott posting lots of stuff about Rand Paul as if that proves his father is a truther.

And SoT acting like a truther does when they think Ron Paul is a truther for denying he's a truther.

All. Very. Weird.
 
Marfoot is a truther? He doesn't think Ron Paul is a truther though. I agree.

Then we have Scott posting lots of stuff about Rand Paul as if that proves his father is a truther.

And SoT acting like a truther does when they think Ron Paul is a truther for denying he's a truther.

All. Very. Weird.

It's hard to tell what madfoot really is. He is the father of this thread
What should a skeptic make of 9/11 criticism?
and this thread about FEMA death camps
Why the hell is the Army hiring "internment specialists"?

He is also the father of this thread promoting the evil MSM conspiracy against Dr. Paul.
Why is Ron Paul ignored by the media?
It may be that even if he himself is a conspiracy theorists, he doesn't want the Ron Paul Revolution to be associated with the likes of himself because, as SoT has repeated pointed out, that will be the kiss of death for Ronny.

But I don't think it's strange to wonder what's really going on with Ron Paul's back-and-forth statements about 9/11, especially considering he's made it clear he thinks conspiracy theories should be considered campaign issues.

I think SoT is being reasonable. Clearly Paul's statements about 9/11 can not be taken at face value. SoT is introspecting from his personal experiences with Truthers about what these could really mean.

All this seems very straight forward to me.
 
Last edited:
And SoT acting like a truther does when they think Ron Paul is a truther for denying he's a truther.

This is acting like a truther?

I don't know that Ron Paul is into magic thermite, space beams, micro nukes or just some form of LIHOP. I strongly feel that Ron Paul believes more than he is saying. And yes, I know my gut feelings are not evidence, it's just my opinion.
This is all speculation, of course. Take it with a grain of salt.

Since when have truthers ever admitted as much about their own beliefs?
 
Marfoot is a truther? He doesn't think Ron Paul is a truther though. I agree.

Then we have Scott posting lots of stuff about Rand Paul as if that proves his father is a truther.

And SoT acting like a truther does when they think Ron Paul is a truther for denying he's a truther.

All. Very. Weird.

I smell a conspiracy! :jaw-dropp
 
No, I'm saying someone who was fired by an individual and ran against their congressional seat is probably a poor source.

Actually whether he was fired or resigned is a matter of dispute, do you have evidence (other than claims of Paul's staff) that it was the former? Also as SoT he mixed criticism and defense of Paul. If he wanted to slander e ex-boss he would do that. Also your hero is no stranger to nutty CTs
 
Did you actually read the article, Madfoot?

Dondero defends Paul against at least three accusations; racism, antisemitism and homophobia. And then he says "Oh, but he's nutty on 9/11". A disgruntled ex-employee out to damage his employer would probably go all negative.

Is it the same article about the gay bathrooms? Some defense. ;)
 
Or Larry Craig!!

But seriously how would reports that he didn't want to use a gay man's bathroom hurt him among his target audience (electorate)?

Well, libertarians are generally pro-tolerance pro-gay, but that's not the point. If you can find someone else who can back up Eric Dondero's claims, tell me about it, but be aware Eric Dondero isn't a credible source for... anything, really.
 
Why would Ron Paul endorse other wacky ideas but draw the line at twoof?


Possibly because the other wacky ideas don't necessarily accuse almost every single member of government of being in on a nefarious plot. Either that or he thinks the 9/11 CTs are really really batty.
 
Well, libertarians are generally pro-tolerance pro-gay, but that's not the point. If you can find someone else who can back up Eric Dondero's claims, tell me about it, but be aware Eric Dondero isn't a credible source for... anything, really.

If you believe this, then you think that Ron Paul is a racist and anti-semite?
 
Ron Paul has said something in the past... and a recent speech to F&FC

Well someone was talking about the John birch society which i live very close to the headquarters of those people.:runaway Ron Paul was been going to Alex Jones show for some time. Like some people. They think that if Ron Paul does win that his views will not affect the laws.

He has said once on the Alex Jones show about false flag attacks which gave somewhat an indicator that he could believe in 9/11.

Ron Paul is pro life to a T and some of them will say well he is half and half. Yes, but when Ron Paul speech is to the faith and freedom coalition you know something is up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhIAYh-2LX0&feature=channel_video_title

Some Ron Paul supporters when they watch this video say that Ron Paul is just trying to pull the christian conservatives to his side. I basically said if he is just playing christian what do you think his policy would be? It just makes a mystery of his own position. If he believes what he says and if he wins, the united states will just be a good fundamentalism country.
 
Last edited:
Well someone was talking about the John birch society which i live very close to the headquarters of those people.:runaway Ron Paul was been going to Alex Jones show for some time. Like some people. They think that if Ron Paul does win that his views will not affect the laws.

He has said once on the Alex Jones show about false flag attacks which gave somewhat an indicator that he could believe in 9/11.

Ron Paul is pro life to a T and some of them will say well he is half and half. Yes, but when Ron Paul speech is to the faith and freedom coalition you know something is up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhIAYh-2LX0&feature=channel_video_title

Some Ron Paul supporters when they watch this video say that Ron Paul is just trying to pull the christian conservatives to his side. I basically said if he is just playing christian what do you think his policy would be? It just makes a mystery of his own position. If he believes what he says and if he wins, the united states will just be a good fundamentalism country.

Yeah, he's pro-life and a Christian. What's your point? Am I a bad atheist for voting for someone who believes in god?

Did I say he was?.....if I did then I'm sorry. Beck however is still a nut, although of a different brand and likely about as dangerous

>libertarians
>dangerous

lol
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom