• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Rick Santorum is an idiot, a bigot, and morally inconsistent...

If you were giving a child up for adoption you would not try to have it done by people who have the same beliefs as to what is the proper way to raise a child?
It's a very common thing relinquishing parents do, as they have a right to. But the adoption agency does not have that right.
 
So you believe there should be no laws regarding sex in privacy? Does that include children? Animals? Incest?

I see nothing wrong with the current CONSENTING ADULTS standard. But as this thread is about Santorum, how about Santorum's downright laughable view.

"As I would with acts of other, what I would consider to be, acts outside of traditional heterosexual relationships. And that includes a variety of different acts, not just homosexual."

And to be clear he's talking about things, he believes should be outlawed. With his history of what he considers 'traditional' in heterosexual relationships, that means only procreative sex.

So are you for laws against oral sex Robert? How about manual sex? Masturbation? Regulations on positions?
 
So you believe there should be no laws regarding sex in privacy?
So long as we are talking about consenting adults.

Does that include children?
Children cannot form legal consent.

Animals cannot form consent.

Icky. I'm not against laws that prohibit sex between fertile siblings but otherwise, so long as we are talking about consenting adults, sure, it disgusts me but it neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
 
Icky. I'm not against laws that prohibit sex between fertile siblings but otherwise, so long as we are talking about consenting adults, sure, it disgusts me but it neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.

There may be a public interest here since incest has a high rate of birth defect
 
I see nothing wrong with the current CONSENTING ADULTS standard. But as this thread is about Santorum, how about Santorum's downright laughable view.

"As I would with acts of other, what I would consider to be, acts outside of traditional heterosexual relationships. And that includes a variety of different acts, not just homosexual."

And to be clear he's talking about things, he believes should be outlawed. With his history of what he considers 'traditional' in heterosexual relationships, that means only procreative sex.

So are you for laws against oral sex Robert? How about manual sex? Masturbation? Regulations on positions?

How about acts causing epidemic disease, killing thousands?
 
How about sexual behavior that causes epidemic disease, contaminates blood supplies and kills thousands???

That's one hell of a party!

Seriously, though, what sort of sexual behavior are you referring to? Because, I'll bet whatever kinds of behavior you're referring to is equally applicable to straights as well as gays, and we still let straight people get married.
 
How about sexual behavior that causes epidemic disease, contaminates blood supplies and kills thousands???
Which happens between heterosexuals. Are you going to make sex between heterosexuals illegal? There is nothing about STD's that ensure they do or will always favor certain behaviors. BTW, what does that have to do with anything? We are capable of solving social health problems without the destruction of our species. AIDS didn't even significantly lower the rate of our growth.
 
Last edited:
Which happens between heterosexuals. Are you going to make sex between heterosexuals illegal? BTW, what does that have to do with anything? We are capable of solving social health problems without the destruction of our species. AIDS didn't even significantly lower the rate of our growth.
And whose spread has been augmented by the kind of social stigma and ignorance Robert and Jude are preaching.

See Africa.
 
Which happens between heterosexuals. Are you going to make sex between heterosexuals illegal? There is nothing about STD's that ensure they do or will always favor certain behaviors. BTW, what does that have to do with anything? We are capable of solving social health problems without the destruction of our species. AIDS didn't even significantly lower the rate of our growth.

Africa still has the largest population growth on the planet. Despite having the highest death rate, Africa still maintains the largest growth rate.
 
Africa still has the largest population growth on the planet. Despite having the highest death rate, Africa still maintains the largest growth rate.
There is some sociological data that supports the idea that as the mortality rate rises our libido does also. "Life finds a way"
 
One could say that once a person decides on adoption, they give up their right to choose how the child is raised.

Why? Once they have actually relinquished their legal rights OK (in most cases) but not while they are trying to find a prospective family.
 
Why? Once they have actually relinquished their legal rights OK (in most cases) but not while they are trying to find a prospective family.
I was being facetious, playing on the fact that the typical pro-life argument is that a woman's choice is gone the moment a fetus is in development.
the reality is when it comes to having a baby, there are many factors in these decisions that make clear cut arguments nearly impossible to realize.

When it comes to adoptions, I believe we should employ the same rational view we have for child custody, "What is best for the child". In this way, the mother may or may not get her say in placement.
 

Back
Top Bottom