For instance, if the characters for "elohim" had happened to appear each separated by a knight's move from the last, would you have then searched the possible knight's tours (there are thirteen trillion of them in an 8x8 grid) for more hits? You found partial distributions of some characters on the grid, that formed the approximate shapes of other characters. How many such shapes did you search for and not find? Did you look for significant four-letter squares, five-letter crosses, approximate maps of parts of the Hebrew ancestral homelands, rainbows, towers, fish? How many different ways could you have rearranged the grid by removing one character and shifting the remaining ones, and how many other equally simple ways of modifying the grid are there, from which to search for one that cryptically relates to a line of scripture? How many other ways could you have turned characters into numbers, then looked for patterns and meanings in those numbers?
You tell me you've been working on this for years; what could you have been spending that time on, if not searching through ever more possibilities? Every new element, technique, association, reference, and manipulation you brought in or considered bringing or would have brought in if you could look ahead to interesting results from doing so (which the human brain is very good at doing) makes the expected likelihood of spurious but significant-looking hits so much greater, not less, because it expands the vast space of possibilities into yet another dimension. You have gone to great effort to show a great variety of different ways to decode meaning from the seal, but that variety works against your hypothesis not in favor of it.
