as a twoofer believing in the 'no planes theory' I feel I have become sidetracked.
there is no evidence the planes were hijacked, there is no cctv pictures of the hijackers at the airport the planes departed from. if the hijackers were on the planes they would not have got into the cockpit. airlines have been prepared for years to combat hijackers, no code 7600 (hijack) was received, which would have taken the pilot seconds. so the hijackers had 'boxcutters', short bladed knives. on an average airline flight there would be many male adult passengers, could the hijackers take them all on? if I was there, a piece of luggage from the overhead rack would have been thrown to their head hard.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98&feature=channel_video_title
oh, what about the phone calls?
what about the phone calls,
listen to the recording of the call from the flight attendent on flight 93 to her husband, who does not think it is genuine, it is obvious she is reading from a script under pressure, and is almost certainly not airborne
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJzoGD_zsiM&feature=channel_video_title
the most obvious lie is the pentagon story. the 5 frames of the security video do not show an airliner, hanjour, who was supposed to be piloting it could not handle a cessna, according to his flight school instructor. experienced pilots on pilots for 9/11 truth site say they could not make the manoevre 77 was supposed to have made. if it did it would pull 10g and break up. many witnesses arrived at the scene in a few minutes and did not see any wreckage.