• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Dragon Family lawsuit against the United Nations

Why do I believe the lawsuit is true? Because even if it looks outrageous on the surface I think the Eastern powers have been fooling the Western powers for a long time, and the lawsuit fits that idea.


You believe it because it confirms the worldview that you just made up? That's precious.
 
You believe it because it confirms the worldview that you just made up? That's precious.

It's a conspiracy theory, yes. Based on things like China and Japan in reality cooperating all the time even when pretending to be enemies at war with each other, and that Hong Kong was meant to become an international financial control hub (including a clearing house for both yuan and the U.S. dollar), and the West tricked to develop Hong Kong for a century after which China could grab it back.

One cool thing with the Dragon Family lawsuit is, if true, that one article mentioned, that the lawsuit is supported also by some big Western powers such as the CIA and the Pentagon! So it's not an east-west conflict thing but rather a power struggle on a level above that it seems.
 
Last edited:
Ok, but it was dismissed already one day after it was filed according to that source.

So what? Your contention was that an absurdly frivolous lawsuit couldn't even be filed and I just showed that one was.

BTW, a frivolous lawsuit may sit on the calendar for months or more if it doesn't appear frivolous by just reading the names of the plaintiffs and defendants. The length of time on the calendar has no bearing on whether the case has merit or not.
 
So what? Your contention was that an absurdly frivolous lawsuit couldn't even be filed and I just showed that one was.

BTW, a frivolous lawsuit may sit on the calendar for months or more if it doesn't appear frivolous by just reading the names of the plaintiffs and defendants. The length of time on the calendar has no bearing on whether the case has merit or not.

So the Dragon Family lawsuit could still be classified as frivolous then. But when is it clear that the lawsuit has been accepted? It would be tedious to have to wait several months.
 
So the Dragon Family lawsuit could still be classified as frivolous then. But when is it clear that the lawsuit has been accepted? It would be tedious to have to wait several months.

Just because a case has been filed doesn't mean that there is any merit to it. The example I provided showed a case that was obviously without merit since it listed Jesus Christ as a defendant and a motor scooter as a plaintiff. It wasn't dismissed until the next day. Case number 09-cv-03001 was filed by the same person as the Jesus Christ case. In it, the plaintiff claimed the State of Colorado and two judges owed him $20 million because he appeared in court for another nonsense case he filed. That case wasn't dismissed until almost four months had passed.
 
You don't know what you mean by "accepted."

I don't know how many stages there are before the lawsuit becomes 'accepted'. By accepted I mean that they start calling witnesses and stuff like that.

When Bosco is asked the question: "Did you order the Code Red?"

And Bosco answers:

"Code red? What's that? Some kind of Commie tactics? Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be torn down. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Mr. Keenan? I have a greater responsibility than you could possibly fathom. You weep for the Dragon Family, and you curse the Vatican. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know. That my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it."
 
I don't know how many stages there are before the lawsuit becomes 'accepted'. By accepted I mean that they start calling witnesses and stuff like that.

Witnesses can be called as early as a preliminary hearing.

When Bosco is asked the question: "Did you order the Code Red?"

You watch too many movies. This case will never get to trial. I promise you.
 
I don't know how many stages there are before the lawsuit becomes 'accepted'. By accepted I mean that they start calling witnesses and stuff like that.

When Bosco is asked the question: "Did you order the Code Red?"

And Bosco answers:

"Code red? What's that? Some kind of Commie tactics? Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be torn down. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Mr. Keenan? I have a greater responsibility than you could possibly fathom. You weep for the Dragon Family, and you curse the Vatican. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know. That my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it."

Yes well apart from anything else 'Few Good Men' deals with a trial held under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, so even in the unlikely event it accurately reflected courtroom procedure it's a court operating under a different legal code.
 
So the Dragon Family lawsuit could still be classified as frivolous then. But when is it clear that the lawsuit has been accepted? It would be tedious to have to wait several months.

Nothing has been accepted. It's been filed. Idiot boy who got scammed was able to correctly file the documents. That's all that happened here.
 
Nothing has been accepted. It's been filed. Idiot boy who got scammed was able to correctly file the documents. That's all that happened here.

Are you sure? That would with the obvious need to have a CT world view confirmed.
 
I don't know how many stages there are before the lawsuit becomes 'accepted'. By accepted I mean that they start calling witnesses and stuff like that.

When Bosco is asked the question: "Did you order the Code Red?"

And Bosco answers:

"Code red? What's that? Some kind of Commie tactics? Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be torn down. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Mr. Keenan? I have a greater responsibility than you could possibly fathom. You weep for the Dragon Family, and you curse the Vatican. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know. That my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it."
Did you just use a movie as a reference?! :jaw-dropp
 
You're new to the whole court system thing, aren't you?

I don't know much about the court system, but I figured a lawsuit is just about a dispute that has to be settled. The exact details I don't know much about, and I don't live in the U.S.
 
Related to the lawsuit is the shady historical dealings with gold. Remember for example when Roosevelt grabbed the gold from the U.S. citizens. That sounds like a pretty drastic and desperate move by the politicians.

"Executive Order 6102 is an Executive Order signed on April 5, 1933, by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt "forbidding the Hoarding of Gold Coin, Gold Bullion, and Gold Certificates within the continental United States". The order criminalized the possession of monetary gold by any individual, partnership, association or corporation." -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102

And in Asia a similar gold grabbing took place:

"Golden lily was the codename given to a project instigated by the Japanese Imperial family. The aim of the project was to rape Asia of its precious metals and mineral resources to feed the industrial revolution back home and the wealth of the Imperial family. ... Nobody knows how much gold and precious metals were in Korea and China at the turn of the 20th century. The accumulated mass of thousands of years of collection and refining in a region of the world which is abundant in natural deposits can neither be guessed at nor confirmed ... for the best part of 40 years the Japanese transferred unhindered, the bullion by ship to the motherland, to be hidden in giant vaults underneath the Imperial palace and underground storage facilitys in the mountains around Tokyo" -- http://joanphils.0catch.com/yamashita_s_treasure__golden_lilly__the_japanese_looting_spree.htm

And remember that I have speculated about how the rulers of the Asian nations were cooperating with each other in secret while pretending publicly to be each other's enemies. In the Second Sino-Japanese War for example, to have the Japanese military to loot all gold they could from the people in China was probably a planned event between the Chinese and Japanese leaders.

What happened the world over from the late 19th century and into the 20th century was a massive gold hoarding by the ruling powers.
 
Last edited:
I don't know much about the court system, but I figured a lawsuit is just about a dispute that has to be settled. The exact details I don't know much about, and I don't live in the U.S.

So yet again you have an unshakeable belief on a topic when you know little or nothing about the relevant facts.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom