Merged General Holocaust denial discussion thread

[abaddon]

Do you think anyone is going to read that crap? I'd be surprised.

SURPRISE!


I will read it.

How does it feel to be wrong yet again?

 

[Saggy]

I do hope that readers of this thread will read and consider the critique rather than greeting it with LOL's and other such know-nothingism without having read it.

Here's some bad news for Nick Terry, that is that holohoax denial does not need Mattogno, Graf, Kues, et. al.. they are not the persons who showed that the holoaust was a degenerate hoax. That distinction belongs to the original Jewish witnesses, like Elie Wiesel, Yankel Wiernik, Abraham Bomba, Filip Muller and the other lying Zionists. You only have to read their actual 'testimony' to know that the holocaust is a paper thin collection of absurd lies. The original Jewish witnesses are the best evidence of the hoax, so Terry and accomplices should have devoted their efforts to rehabilitating these grotesque liars.

But, unfortunately, we won't have Nick Terry to kick around anymore.

 

[LemmyCaution]

Himmler, speech to commanders of Liebstandarte, evening of Metz Day, 7 September 1940:

we had to cart off tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of people. We had to be tough enough - you're going to listen to this and then immediately forget it again - to shoot thousands of leading Poles.

BAB, NS 19/4007

Is it just me, or does this thinking sound familiar to anyone else?

 

[Saggy]

SURPRISE!


I will read it.

How does it feel to be wrong yet again?

Probably no one reads Mattogno who doesn't already know the holocaust is a hoax. Terry is trying to close the barn door when the cows are already long gone.

 

[Nick Terry]

Here's some bad news for Nick Terry, that is that holohoax denial does not need Mattogno, Graf, Kues, et. al.. they are not the persons who showed that the holoaust was a degenerate hoax. That distinction belongs to the original Jewish witnesses, like Elie Wiesel, Yankel Wiernik, Abraham Bomba, Filip Muller and the other lying Zionists. You only have to read their actual 'testimony' to know that the holocaust is a paper thin collection of absurd lies. The original Jewish witnesses are the best evidence of the hoax, so Terry and accomplices should have devoted their efforts to rehabilitating these grotesque liars.

But, unfortunately, we won't have Nick Terry to kick around anymore.

Your post is completely deranged.

 

[LemmyCaution]

So Saggy seems to be implying that all denial needs is more copies of "Night" being sold, since "You only have to read [the] actual 'testimony'" of the "lying Zionists" to recognize the "absurd lies" being told in such books. "Night" had sold over 10 million copies by 2008 and yet denial still struggles and shrinks. So how many copies of "Night" does "holohoax denial" need? If the book would sell 20 million copies, would people start to recognize the grotesque lies of the lying Zionists?

 

[A'isha]

Are you going to cite that book you quoted, Saggy? With the full title, authors/editors, publisher, copyright date, Library of Congress info, and ISBN (if available)?

You said you had the book, and found the quote in question by randomly flipping through the pages, so it should be an easy task for you.

 

[Saggy]

So Saggy seems to be implying that all denial needs is more copies of "Night" being sold, since "You only have to read [the] actual 'testimony'" of the "lying Zionists" to recognize the "absurd lies" being told in such books. "Night" had sold over 10 million copies by 2008 and yet denial still struggles and shrinks. So how many copies of "Night" does "holohoax denial" need? If the book would sell 20 million copies, would people start to recognize the grotesque lies of the lying Zionists?

'Night' is direct proof of the holohoax for at least 3 distinct reasons, each one sufficient for any reasonable person to conclude that the holohoax is an absurd and grotesque collection of lies. Of course anyone can tell lies with no consequence, but Elie Wiesel is not anyone, he is the first director of the USHMM, a Nobel Prize winner, and the embodiment of the holohoax, his lies have consequences, Wiesel's lies ARE the holohoax.

The three reasons - the absurd phantasmagoria of babies being tossed into the air and used as targets for machine gunners, the absurd phantasmagoria of adults thrown live into a burning pit and babies into another, and the fact that Wiesel does not mention gas chambers even thought he was a prisoner at where the hoax claims 10,000 were being gassed and cremated daily.

The fact that 10 million copies have been sold, and that the book is recommended on many school reading lists, is a mystery I cannot fathom ! It is chutzpah to the 1000th degree.

 

[Saggy]

Your post is completely deranged.

Hooray ! We do still have Nick Terry to kick around.

 

[Robrob]

The three reasons - the absurd phantasmagoria of babies being tossed into the air and used as targets for machine gunners, the absurd phantasmagoria of adults thrown live into a burning pit and babies into another, and the fact that Wiesel does not mention gas chambers even thought he was a prisoner at where the hoax claims 10,000 were being gassed and cremated daily.

As many times as you've made this argument from incredulity, you've never managed to explain why it's impossible.

1) "babies being tossed into the air" Are you claiming babies can't physically be tossed in the air?

2) "targets for machine gunners" Are you claiming babies in the air can't be targeted by machine gunners (or, more accurately, sub-machine gunners)?

3) "adults thrown live into a burning pit" Are you claiming adults can't be thrown live into a burning pit?

4) "babies into another" Are you claiming babies can't be thrown into another pit?

Well?

 

[Clayton Moore]

So Saggy seems to be implying that all denial needs is more copies of "Night" being sold, since "You only have to read [the] actual 'testimony'" of the "lying Zionists" to recognize the "absurd lies" being told in such books. "Night" had sold over 10 million copies by 2008 and yet denial still struggles and shrinks. So how many copies of "Night" does "holohoax denial" need? If the book would sell 20 million copies, would people start to recognize the grotesque lies of the lying Zionists?

Actually it shows how brain dead people are when it comes to believing in the Holocaust. All it will take is a computer model using available data to prove much of it is a self serving fabrication.

 

[Clayton Moore]

'Night' is direct proof of the holohoax for at least 3 distinct reasons, each one sufficient for any reasonable person to conclude that the holohoax is an absurd and grotesque collection of lies. Of course anyone can tell lies with no consequence, but Elie Wiesel is not anyone, he is the first director of the USHMM, a Nobel Prize winner, and the embodiment of the holohoax, his lies have consequences, Wiesel's lies ARE the holohoax.

The three reasons - the absurd phantasmagoria of babies being tossed into the air and used as targets for machine gunners, the absurd phantasmagoria of adults thrown live into a burning pit and babies into another, and the fact that Wiesel does not mention gas chambers even thought he was a prisoner at where the hoax claims 10,000 were being gassed and cremated daily.

The fact that 10 million copies have been sold, and that the book is recommended on many school reading lists, is a mystery I cannot fathom ! It is chutzpah to the 1000th degree.

You can say that again.

 

[Clayton Moore]

The three reasons - the absurd phantasmagoria of babies being tossed into the air and used as targets for machine gunners, the absurd phantasmagoria of adults thrown live into a burning pit and babies into another, and the fact that Wiesel does not mention gas chambers even thought he was a prisoner at where the hoax claims 10,000 were being gassed and cremated daily.

If possible, even more absurd was the packing the gas chambers tightly with adults and throwing babies atop them to maximize the killing.

 

[TSR]

All it will take is a computer model using available data to prove much of it is a self serving fabrication.

.
Then why don't you do it and stop whining and posting lies here?

You're the "systems engineer" and so much smarter than anyone else here, after all [ / sarcasm ]
.

 

[MG1962]

Actually it shows how brain dead people are when it comes to believing in the Holocaust. All it will take is a computer model using available data to prove much of it is a self serving fabrication.

Sure go for it - here is your chance to leave maybe the biggest mark on the world anyone has ever seen. Unravel 60 years of history, expose the complete truth about the world, and how it is been run by lies

 

[TSR]

You can say that again.

.
Yeah, repeating the lie would be so much easier than actually demonstrating how many schools recommend this book as part of a history curriculum.

The chutzpah is entirely on the denier side, bubulah...
.

 

[TSR]

If possible, even more absurd was the packing the gas chambers tightly with adults and throwing babies atop them to maximize the killing.

.
Now, all you need to do is find an historian who endorses this detail, and *then* we can debate what exactly you find so "absurd" about the idea.

Or is that too much like that research thingy you hate so much?
.

 

[Clayton Moore]

.
Now, all you need to do is find an historian who endorses this detail, and *then* we can debate what exactly you find so "absurd" about the idea.

Or is that too much like that research thingy you hate so much?
.

After you supply an honest Holocaust historian.

 

[Robrob]

If possible, even more absurd was the packing the gas chambers tightly with adults and throwing babies atop them to maximize the killing.

OK, that adds another argument from incredulity.

As many times as you've made this argument, you've never managed to explain why it's impossible.

1) "babies being tossed into the air" Are you claiming babies can't physically be tossed in the air?

2) "targets for machine gunners" Are you claiming babies in the air can't be targeted by machine gunners (or, more accurately, sub-machine gunners)?

3) "adults thrown live into a burning pit" Are you claiming adults can't be thrown live into a burning pit?

4) "babies into another" Are you claiming babies can't be thrown into another pit?

5) "packing the gas chambers tightly with adults and throwing babies atop them to maximize the killing" Are you claiming adults couldn't be packed in tightly, that babies couldn't be thrown on top or both?

Well?

After you supply an honest Holocaust historian.

As judged by you of course...

 

[TSR]

After you supply an honest Holocaust historian.

.
Thanks for the admission that even the *dis*honest historians don't cite "Night".

You must go through a *lot* of shoes after putting all of those holes in them...
.