December Stundie nominations

New member, new contender!


So it doesn't disturb any of you that the CIA is routinely kidnapping, torturing and sexually abusing children in order to turn them into government assassins then?


Yes, if we don't believe it's happening, it must not disturb us that it's happening...or something....:confused:
 
Our own little Stundie generating machine, Robert Prey, gives us this:
Robert Prey said:
You just won't watch the video will you?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AuNDNpY4f4

I know it's 11 mins long but you only need to see the first 30 secs.

Looks impressive. The guy appears to have achieved the impossible. But do you believe in Magic? Each time the guy moves the angle of the pipe from 11 o'clock to 10 o'clock when showing the 90 degree shadow, which does not quite make it to 90 degrees. Nonetheless, an impressive trick. I tried, but couldn't do it even cheating. The big log is just another magicians prop, being sufficiently curved to achieve the intended shadow.
But nice try.

The Oswald backyard photos are faked because the shadow angle is impossible so the video must use magic to duplicate the shadows.
 
:sdl:

That's pretty good.

Wait, if you found that, are you a poster there, and if so, wouldn't you be a member of the "David Icke team?" :eek:
 
Last edited:
A nice Anti-Vax stundie from the politics forum.

First the setup:
Tim Callahan will probably find this video quite upsetting.

http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=608256A446123276E4E72A5351322186

Dr. Wakefield's point by point defense and indictment of the BMJ as well as ABC and the Phama/Media/Industry complex. Note that the pre-video ad in the video cited by Tim Callahan is from MERCK. What does that tell you Deep Thinkers???

  • Dr. Wakefield was repudiated by the Lancet. A respected peer reviewed Journal.
  • No other reputable researcher has ever replicated Wakefield's experiments (remember, studies are worthless if they can't be replicated. That' IS a bedrock of science)
  • No subsequent studies have ever been published in a respected peer reviewed journal.
  • No major skeptical organization (CFI, NESS, Scientific American, Skeptic Magazine, etc.) supports Wakefield.
  • Further, there is a negative correlation of autism rates after mercury was removed from vaccines.
Wakefield can speak until he is blue in the face. If ALL that is meaningless in the face of his shuck and jive then nothing can be trusted.
and now the stundie:

Just as I suspected. You didn't even view view the video. Another head in sand Deep Thinker.
 
From the Icke Forums yet again:

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060431600&postcount=1

"Your top ten questions about 9/11 ?....

1. Why does the American paper currency (5 to 100 dollar bills) when folded just right show in sequence the portrayal of the 9/11 events (the twin towers collapse & pentagon)...."

This person is actually saying that paper money that has been in circulation for many years prior to 9/11 has clues to the events of 9/1 if you fold it "just right".

Sorry I just had to type that myself to believe it.

From the same post:

"5. Why did Larry admit to give a go ahead to “pull it” (on WTC7), how would they have been able to rig it so fast? How did they get all the materials onsite and ready, not to mention the professional demo people needed to “pull it”. Would you go into a building to prep it for demo if there were uncontrollable fires on the lower floors? And what started fires in the first place? None of the other buildings seemed to catch fire….???"

Wow talk about starting with a conclusion then working backwards. What a beautiful example of truther logic ending of course with ignorance of basic facts of 9/11.

This person would have to be 15 or 16 considering the level of ignorance, right???

Right???
 
None of the other buildings seemed to catch fire….???"

WTC-5?
wtc5_fire_floors.jpg
 
Don't call it "education" whien government gets to control it. Call it brainwash, call it dumbed down stupidization, call it social engineering, but don't call it 'education."

Yes, the guy who had to ask where one might find the laws of inertia, and struggles to understand what counts as "material" evidence is worried education will get dumbed down.

One has to wonder how much dumber it could be.
 
A truther explains to me how the press managed to expose scandals like Watergate, Iran-Contra and Enron, but refuses to look at 9/11.

http://www.amazon.com/review/R2684D...HFAQE0B&cdMsgID=Mx2XP8DYSHBSWC#Mx2XP8DYSHBSWC


not only were these stories WAAAY back in most cases these stories were broken by one person and then the story spread. There are some stories so simple you CAN'T keep them under wraps (9/11 is a HUGE story with many complex areas to easily cover) And this doesn't change the fact that the media is now controlled.

Although this would finally explain why their theories are so mind-numbingly complex and convoluted. So maybe he is on to something?
 
A truther explains to me how the press managed to expose scandals like Watergate, Iran-Contra and Enron, but refuses to look at 9/11.

http://www.amazon.com/review/R2684D...HFAQE0B&cdMsgID=Mx2XP8DYSHBSWC#Mx2XP8DYSHBSWC




Although this would finally explain why their theories are so mind-numbingly complex and convoluted. So maybe he is on to something?

I'm stunned to find that people are using the Amazon comment-on-reviews function as a venue to argue. That's really bizarre.
 
In regards to parents of autistic children bringing law suits against vaccine companies.

I did read that 83 suits were among those that did succeed in Vaccine Court. Those 83 didn't attempt to make a case for link between vaccines and autism but all 83 involved an autistic child.
 
He's obviously here to troll. He should be eliminated from any consideration for a Stundie award. I also recommend the ignore feature.

Hey, there's no need for that. I'm not here to troll, I'm an honest poster and I don't want to be ignored. I was just being silly in that thread, and even there I did genuinely want to know what people here would say about Dale Griffis, and particularly about his expert witness status at a death penalty trial.

I'm not a "he" either, how many men do you think would call themselves Strawberry??
 

Back
Top Bottom