• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

U.N. accuses Syria forces of crimes against humanity

well, if violent crimes against the population don't swing public opinion in favour of regime change, denying the Syrian people a popular electronic gadget might be enough to get Joe onside.


Syria bans i-phones

The game is on. I wonder if it'll all be over by Christmas...
 
I imagine Asad's attempt to curb the flow of information will work as well as Mubarak's and Qaddafi's did.
 
Last edited:
I imagine Asad's attempt to curb the flow of information will work as well as Mubarak's and Qaddafi's did.


Indeed.

Apparently other smartphones are not to be banned, which makes me wonder if this report has any substance.
 
Indeed.

Apparently other smartphones are not to be banned, which makes me wonder if this report has any substance.

I can't remember if it was Syria or China, but I recall blackberries could be tracked through government software. Owning one actually made you more observable to the state, not less.

Maybe they can't design a suitable ap for iPhones? ;)
 
well, if violent crimes against the population don't swing public opinion in favour of regime change, denying the Syrian people a popular electronic gadget might be enough to get Joe onside.


Syria bans i-phones

The game is on. I wonder if it'll all be over by Christmas...

Yeah, Apple fans can get pretty crazy. Cross them and governments could topple.
 
I can't remember if it was Syria or China, but I recall blackberries could be tracked through government software. Owning one actually made you more observable to the state, not less.

Maybe they can't design a suitable ap for iPhones? ;)


:D

could be, could be....

( sort of off-topically interesting: during the England riots of August, Blackberry came-out top as the, erm, 'activists' best device regards privacy. Something to do with Her Maj's spooks not being able to access the messaging service )

More and more, though, the words 'civil war' are creeping into some of the news reports I've been reading.
 
More and more, though, the words 'civil war' are creeping into some of the news reports I've been reading.

Bashar Al-Asad declared war on the Syrian people, and the people are fighting back.

Whether the label "civil war" applies or not seems to be largely immaterial.
 
Whether the label "civil war" applies or not seems to be largely immaterial.


I absolutely agree. To be clear, I'm not advocating support for Assad's actions.

There are interesting parallels, with Libya, in how public opinion is being courted. Without Nato support Libya would still have Ghaddafi.

A similair approach in Syria is not unthinkable, but any 'blowback' could have much wider consequences.

The removal of, if not favoured then certainly accommodated, dictatorial regimes has to be a good thing in the long run, if you ask me, but what takes the place of that regime? What happens to all the people of the former regime that made it tick on a day-to-day level?

I'm just finding it difficult to find any press that shows those questions are being considered at a high level.



ETA: I have found some possibly inter-related articles on comms networks:

USA

Lebanon
 
Last edited:
Given Syria's volatile, unpredictable mix of ethnicities, loyalties and allies, it's anyone's guess what will happen next, and if so, when. I will, however venture the following: history books are getting a serious rewrite this year.

Possibly, but then again some of this stuff gets forgotten quite quickly. Like the Hama Massacre.
 
I really can't help but wonder how the Londoners who had their cataracts or whatever fixed by Bashar al-Assad, M.D. feel right now.
 
They once were blind, but now they see?

Yeah, but it must feel pretty weird.

"It was good to finally see again."
"Your ophthalmologist must have been very skilled."
"Indeed. I hear he's a dictator in Syria now."
 
Assad might be a reluctant dictator.
I think his older brother was groomed for the role, but he died in a car crash.

He's been put in charge of the family business, and doing the best he can.

He is faced with an interesting dilemma:
The people are rising up. If he acts soft, the uprising will keep increasing and his ass is toast.
So conventional wisdom (in dictator circles) is to put your foot down. Hard.
Do that early enough and you knock the wind out of the insurrection (Tienanmen square, Hama).

But if you resort to massive violence and the people rise up regardless, you end up looking like an angry teacher powerlessly yelling at an unruly classroom.
Assad has reached this point. He's had his troops fire into crowds, he's made people disappear, he's had kids tortured. The people are still in the streets.

And the whole ruling class of Syria is looking at him. Will he manage to get this under control and return things to normal? All those generals, intelligence chiefs and ministers (although most of them are his direct family, I hear).

They're looking at Egypt. They could sacrifice Assad, put him on trial and then find a new role in the new Syria. I mean, after the revolution, Syria will still have an army, police, ministries and the secret service.

Must be an interesting year for Bashar.
 
I can't remember if it was Syria or China, but I recall blackberries could be tracked through government software. Owning one actually made you more observable to the state, not less.

Maybe they can't design a suitable ap for iPhones? ;)

Angry Bashars? :duck:
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom