• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has there ever been a Conspiracy Theory that was in fact true?

The posts of yours as connected by your links here......

Scott Sommers said:
Naughty? Not a chance. You wanna see naughty, check this out. But then, why bother? Just go here and scroll down to my post #7.

I agree with you completely and thank you for having the patience. I would have strung it out a while longer and tried to whip even the more patient people among us into a frenzy. That way, they would hate you every time they see your name.

But seriously, it's driving me nuts, as well. It's a complete misunderstanding of the point of conspiracy. What interests me is why there is this misunderstanding. I would have thought it was straightforward. Bad planning and the creation of underprivileged groups may be a logical consequence of the system we all live in, but it's hardly conspiracy - and it doesn't even seem like it to me. So what's the logic that goes through the minds of those conspiracy intellectuals gathering here to thrash out the details of their ideas and put them to the hard test of the JREF?
Click to expand...

The posts of yours as connected by your links here Scott are SO FUNNY!, not to mention ENLIGHTENING.

At the risk of being misunderstood by way of flattery and all that so very awkward stuff that attends it, I venture here to say we are different Scott in our views to be sure, but there is much we have in common and I actually wish I knew you. Perhaps some day. Best to you....
 
Last edited:
Two Major Conspiracies

Two major conspiracies I have not seen listed on this board are:

The Clinton/Janet Reno cover-up of the systematic murder of the Branch Davidians at Waco.

And

The real perps, accomplices and government provocateurs involved in the OKC bombing and the fact that the ATF had advance knowledge and got their people out ahead of time.
 
Robert, what was the OKC motive...?.....

Robert Prey said:
Two major conspiracies I have not seen listed on this board are:

The Clinton/Janet Reno cover-up of the systematic murder of the Branch Davidians at Waco.

And

The real perps, accomplices and government provocateurs involved in the OKC bombing and the fact that the ATF had advance knowledge and got their people out ahead of time.
Click to expand...

Robert, what was the OKC motive...?.....That situation so confuses me. What was it ABOUT?????
 
No problemo Scott, they think I am bad already....

Scott Sommers said:
We're friends now. Especially after the way you brushed off Conspiracy Boy. Are you sure you want to be my friend? Some people think that would make you bad.


Click to expand...

No problemo Scott, they think I am bad already...
 
Patrick1000 said:
Robert, what was the OKC motive...?.....That situation so confuses me. What was it ABOUT?????
Click to expand...

Some have theorized it was the suppression of liberty as evidenced in the subsequent Patriot Act. Others claim it was just a sting operation that went wrong. It definitely seems to have been a sting operation, for whatever the purpose.
 
Also missing from this board are the other suspicious activities involving Bill Clinton as documented in Ambrose Evans-Pritichard's book "The Secret Life of Bill Clinton."

An Amazon review sums it up:

"Cited by White House press secretary Mike McCurry as the origin of every major Clinton scandal story, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard has done more than any other journalist to expose the truth about the Clintons. Now Evans-Pritchard is breaking the biggest scoop of all: an assiduously documented expose of "the black-water scandals" - the scandals that have gone unreported in the American media, but that characterize the Clinton presidency as the most corrupt in history. Among the secrets Evans-Pritchard exposes: The Oklahoma City bombing as a government sting operation that flew out of control when the stingers were outstung. Evans-Pritchard tells the story that the FBI and the Justice Department don't want you to know. Eyewitnesses to corruption in Clinton's Arkansas - many have met with brutal harassment, physical intimidation, and, in some cases, even suspicious death. Those who survived tell Evans-Pritchard their story. Bill Clinton's involvement in the drug underworld of Arkansas. ... The true story of Vince Foster's death - what the official report won't tell you, but what eyewitnesses saw, and why the government is being sued for falsifying sworn testimony. In the aftermath of Vince Foster, the shocking story of the murder of Jerry Parks, head of Clinton security in Little Rock. Why Parks predicted his own death..."
 
Robert Prey said:
Some have theorized it was the suppression of liberty as evidenced in the subsequent Patriot Act. Others claim it was just a sting operation that went wrong. It definitely seems to have been a sting operation, for whatever the purpose.
Click to expand...

So, no perpetrator, no means, no motive, no opportunity, no evidence - but your magical liberal-hating sense just tells you Clinton is to blame for the OKC bombing, because no anti-semitic racist hate-mongering patriot nutcase would ever have done something like this.

Got anything more substantial, or can we just go straight to laughing at you for this nonsense?
 
Chaos said:
So, no perpetrator, no means, no motive, no opportunity, no evidence - but your magical liberal-hating sense just tells you Clinton is to blame for the OKC bombing, because no anti-semitic racist hate-mongering patriot nutcase would ever have done something like this.

Got anything more substantial, or can we just go straight to laughing at you for this nonsense?
Click to expand...

A ridiculous post. Ask a specific question if you want a dialogue, otherwise read a book: "The Secret Life of Bill Clinton" by Ambose Evans-Pritchard. It's all there.
 
Chaos said:
Got anything more substantial, or can we just go straight to laughing at you for this nonsense?
Click to expand...

Robert Prey said:
A ridiculous post. Ask a specific question if you want a dialogue, otherwise read a book: "The Secret Life of Bill Clinton" by Ambose Evans-Pritchard. It's all there.
Click to expand...

How about: "Got any substantial evidence to support your claim or is it based entirely upon your own opinion?"

Or, to phrase it another, but equally specific way, insomuch as to specifically ask if you have any substantial evidence to support your claims:

Chaos said:
Got anything more substantial, or can we just go straight to laughing at you for this nonsense?
Click to expand...
 
Chaos said:
So, no perpetrator, no means, no motive, no opportunity, no evidence - but your magical liberal-hating sense just tells you Clinton is to blame for the OKC bombing, because no anti-semitic racist hate-mongering patriot nutcase would ever have done something like this.

Got anything more substantial, or can we just go straight to laughing at you for this nonsense?
Click to expand...

When the student is ready, the teacher appears. There were perps, means, motives, opportunity and evidence. But sophomoric posts do not invite intelligent discussion.
 
Ah yes, on that subject let's throw in the "vast right-wing conspiracy" AKA the Arkansas Project, alleged by Hillary Clinton and roundly mocked, then exposed by turncoat David Brock years later. Yet Robert, along with many other people, remain in denial about it today.
 
Last edited:
Robert Prey said:
When the student is ready, the teacher appears. There were perps, means, motives, opportunity and evidence. But sophomoric posts do not invite intelligent discussion.
Click to expand...

As long as you do not present the perpetrators, means, motives, opportunity and evidence, we have to assume you do not have any, because your behavior so far perfectly mimics that of someone who knowingly makes false claims that he is aware he cannot back, and thus has to resort to attacking those who question his claims.

So, where is your evidence?
 
IIIClovisIII said:
Perhaps Bruce Ivins wasn't the only one? There could have been two or more.
Click to expand...

It's possible. Is the case closed? See, I was hoping for something like the government and the drug companies conspiring to drive up the sales of cipro. Or hell just the drug companies.
 
Chaos said:
As long as you do not present the perpetrators, means, motives, opportunity and evidence, we have to assume you do not have any, because your behavior so far perfectly mimics that of someone who knowingly makes false claims that he is aware he cannot back, and thus has to resort to attacking those who question his claims.

So, where is your evidence?
Click to expand...

Let me try to make it ABC kindygarten simple for you. The OKC bombing has about as much detail in terms of who, how, what and why as the JFK assassination. It would be impossible to answer such open ended questions on this small board without writing a book. Thus, my rule is, one question at a time or forget about it.

When the student is ready, the teacher appears.
 
I'll make it simple for you. The conspiracy theories regarding Waco and the OKC bombings are not true.
 
Patrick1000 said:
Can you believe that roughly 20% of adult Americans still smoke ? ! That is 44 million people!!!! These people will DIE! Where even now is the strong message called for by government ? ! ? ! ? ! The reality of the public health threat needs to be hammered......
Click to expand...
I hate to be the one to break it to you, but everyone will die, smokers and non-smokers alike.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom