Nuclear (i.e. fission and fusion) mythologies and politics

where's rerevisionist anyway? Maybe he has the evidence that Anders is looking for.

:eek: My advice to rerevisionist would be to not push it too much. Because what IF the conspiracy theory is true? Then people who have real evidence may be silenced.
 
:eek: My advice to rerevisionist would be to not push it too much. Because what IF the conspiracy theory is true? Then people who have real evidence may be silenced.

Oh, good call. You may have just saved a life today. Excellent job O intrepid warrior of truth! :D
 
Maybe he got radiation poisoning in Japan, trying to prove it was all imaginary.

No, he'd be a hairless emaciated figure with bleeding gums, blogging about how the Jews poisoned him with thermite to fake radiation sickness.
 
Well, to be fair, rerevisionist actually seems to believe his... unique view of reality. AL, on the other hand, really is just a lazy, dishonest troll. If the grown-ups stop responding to him, he'll eventually go away.
 
Yes, they have been fooled by false results from scientific experiments that show that Einstein's relativity is true. And from that false foundation they continue to build theoretical constructs such as the superstring and M-theories.

I read somewhere that: contrary to many claims in textbooks, no scientific experiment has confirmed that the speed of light is constant relative to a moving source.

Well that pretty much overthrows Einstein.
 
21msoi1.jpg


"It's pronounced 'nucular'. Nucular."
 
Um, so you believe quantum mechanics to be, in general, quantum horsepucky?

No. It's Einstein's relativity that is false. Time is not a dimension. And going around in a rocket around Earth near the speed of light will not speed up the evolution of the entire universe.
 
No. It's Einstein's relativity that is false. Time is not a dimension. And going around in a rocket around Earth near the speed of light will not speed up the evolution of the entire universe.

I was not aware that anyone was making that claim. Time on Earth (or the rest of the universe) does not speed up just because elapsed time on a fast moving spaceship is changing relative to that on Earth. Remember, the ship is part of the universe too.

Ranb
 
I was not aware that anyone was making that claim. Time on Earth (or the rest of the universe) does not speed up just because elapsed time on a fast moving spaceship is changing relative to that on Earth. Remember, the ship is part of the universe too.

Ranb

The claim is that a rocket accelerating from Earth to near the speed of light relative to Earth will make those aboard the rocket experience say 10 years when those on Earth experience 1 year. This means that those aboard the rocket will experience the evolution on Earth speeding up x10 times, and as you said, neither Earth nor the rocket are separate from the universe, so those in the rocket will also experience the sun aging 10 years, and the rest of the Milky Way galaxy aging 10 years and the other galaxies aging 10 years, while those on Earth experience the universe aging only 1 year.
 
Relativistic effects have been experimentally confirmed literally millions of times.

You having "read somewhere" this ain't so only means someone somewhere was lying to you.
 
Relativistic effects have been experimentally confirmed literally millions of times.

You having "read somewhere" this ain't so only means someone somewhere was lying to you.

My prediction is that relativistic effects have been experimentally confirmed in a correct way zero times.
 
The claim is that a rocket accelerating from Earth to near the speed of light relative to Earth will make those aboard the rocket experience say 10 years when those on Earth experience 1 year. This means that those aboard the rocket will experience the evolution on Earth speeding up x10 times, and as you said, neither Earth nor the rocket are separate from the universe, so those in the rocket will also experience the sun aging 10 years, and the rest of the Milky Way galaxy aging 10 years and the other galaxies aging 10 years, while those on Earth experience the universe aging only 1 year.

I'm pretty sure you have that exactly backwards.
 

Back
Top Bottom