Anders Lindman
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2010
- Messages
- 13,833
where's rerevisionist anyway? Maybe he has the evidence that Anders is looking for.
where's rerevisionist anyway? Maybe he has the evidence that Anders is looking for.
My advice to rerevisionist would be to not push it too much. Because what IF the conspiracy theory is true? Then people who have real evidence may be silenced.
where's rerevisionist anyway? Maybe he has the evidence that Anders is looking for.
Maybe he got radiation poisoning in Japan, trying to prove it was all imaginary.
Done that. I haven't seen any credible evidence for atom bombs being real.
Yes, they have been fooled by false results from scientific experiments that show that Einstein's relativity is true. And from that false foundation they continue to build theoretical constructs such as the superstring and M-theories.
I read somewhere that: contrary to many claims in textbooks, no scientific experiment has confirmed that the speed of light is constant relative to a moving source.
Even the theory about nuclear weapons may be false. I believe for example that Einstein's relativity is a hoax theory.
Um, so you believe quantum mechanics to be, in general, quantum horsepucky?
No. It's Einstein's relativity that is false. Time is not a dimension. And going around in a rocket around Earth near the speed of light will not speed up the evolution of the entire universe.
I was not aware that anyone was making that claim. Time on Earth (or the rest of the universe) does not speed up just because elapsed time on a fast moving spaceship is changing relative to that on Earth. Remember, the ship is part of the universe too.
Ranb
Relativistic effects have been experimentally confirmed literally millions of times.
You having "read somewhere" this ain't so only means someone somewhere was lying to you.
My prediction is that relativistic effects have been experimentally confirmed in a correct way zero times.
Why do all GPS satellites experience the same, increasing discrepancy between their internal clocks and ground-based clocks?
The claim is that a rocket accelerating from Earth to near the speed of light relative to Earth will make those aboard the rocket experience say 10 years when those on Earth experience 1 year. This means that those aboard the rocket will experience the evolution on Earth speeding up x10 times, and as you said, neither Earth nor the rocket are separate from the universe, so those in the rocket will also experience the sun aging 10 years, and the rest of the Milky Way galaxy aging 10 years and the other galaxies aging 10 years, while those on Earth experience the universe aging only 1 year.
I'm pretty sure you have that exactly backwards.
Because the clocks in the GPS satellites are deliberately adjusted to run at a slightly different rate.