• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged General Holocaust denial discussion thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Speak for yourself. I don't make slanderous lies for personal gain. When I occasionally tell the odd porkie it is entirely from a sense of fun and entertainment.

There is no moral equivalence between me and the tribe of Hoaxsters.
The odd porkie? You litter the landscape with deceit and lies to get a rise out of people and to see what you can get away with. For example, the insinuation here that anyone on this forum is telling "slanderous lies for personal gain." I think we can all agree that there is no moral equivalence whatsoever between you and your porkies and the "tribe" attempting to understand this history. In this case, we appreciate a rare moment of candor and a clarification that wasn't needed.
 
Last edited:
Since if Kruk was not alive, it is difficult to know if it was he who discovered the diary.
To expand a little on my reply to this particularly ignorant and bizarrely inane comment made by LGR, according to David Patterson, in his Encyclopedia of Holocaust Literature, Kruk, after retrieving Kalmanovich's manuscript, "entrusted the diary to Abraham Sutzkever a well-known Yiddish poet and partisan. Thanks to Sutzkever, Kalmanovitch's diary ultimately found its way into the Yiddish Scientific Institute (YIVO)." p77 Of course, Sutzkever, Kalmanovich, and Kruk all worked together both in the Rosenberg Task Force as well as in the ghetto library which Kruk established. Sutzkever survived to testify about the war years, dying only last year. Dina Porat, who wrote a biography of Abba Kovner, learned details about Kalmanovich's diary through interviews in Israel with Kalmanovich's son, Shalom Luria.
 
Last edited:
Deniers' opportunistic use of Kruk's diary is a good illustration of how they will say whatever suits their purposes.

In this thread, ignoring all evidence apart from Kruk, and to try in vain to salvage some shred doubt as to what went on at Ponar, LGR drops cryptic little hints against the authenticity and reliability of Kruk's diary (refusing to put anything even resembling an argument together).

Elsewhere, however, denier "Thomas Kues," in the process of misusing some material in Kruk's diary (specifically, rumor and hearsay recorded by Kruk), vouches for the reliability of the document - and in his case, its being doubtful he cares one way or the other, precisely so he can misrepresent it.

To understand how this works, consider some types of evidence in Kruk's journal. The most reliable evidence presented by Kruk consists of documents he cites (the manuscript included originals of many) and what he himself witnessed first-hand. Other good evidence includes his interviews with witnesses, survivors, participants, and officials as well as his investigations of specific events. Less reliable by far are rumors and hearsay he recorded, often signaling his doubt or his need to find out more. Kruk's diary was not a final, published work but contained what he knew, what he was hearing, what he was verifying, meaning that the manuscript contains this mixture of types of evidence. So alongside what Kruk well knew and could well document is included hearsay and rumor, reported just as Kruk was hearing it and bearing more "discovery."

It is this latter rumor and hearsay evidence, sketchy to be sure, that Kues of course seized upon, stated as fact without putting it in context, and used to try creating a rewrite of certain events touched on by Kruk and dear to Kues's denier heart. Kues did not effectively or honestly question the hearsay or rumor - he simply accepted what was convenient to his claims. Kues's handling of the hearsay and rumor in Kruk means that, if he wants to be honest and consistent, he also has to accept a great deal of Kruk he wishes to reject, including the reliable material like that on Schloss, Trojak, and Katz and the material that meshes with other sources, as well as the less likely material that does not correlate well with other sources. No worries, like LGR, Kues has no interest in being honest or consistent.

So we have the spectacle of denier Kues clutching at one straw - that the diary contains only verified fact, even in places where it is clearly an unverified rumor being discussed - whilst denier LGR tries throwing the whole thing out, rumor along with documented material, to erase what is reliable and stumble on in giant ignorance.

Kues's mendacity and, to borrow a phrase, his special treatment of evidence are well explained here http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2010/06/evidence-for-presence-of-gassed-jews-in_16.html by Roberto Muehlenkamp, with an example here http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2011/01/kues-dishonesty-about-kruk.html from Jon Harrison.
 
Of course Mr Caution would probably think Avrom Sutzkever was an honest man also - despite seeming to go out of his way to imply there was a gas chamber at Ponary when testifying at Nuremberg.
Taking note that Sutzkever testified at Nuremberg (it must be acknowledged, since Sutzkever never was sent to Ponar, based on what he had only heard, from survivors and others, and on what he remembered after the war) that victims from Vilna were "herded . . . into certain buildings near the village of Ponari, about 8 kilometers from Vilna. From there hardly one returned,” LGR makes a wild charge, even for him. For some reason LGR has tried to stretch this statement of Sutzkever’s into an implication about gas chambers, this claim made despite Sutzkever's having written elsewhere that the method of execution at Ponar was by shooting, despite that in his account of shootings Sutzkever reported details similar to details cited at the time of the killings and by others, and despite Sutzkever's not having mentioned gas chambers or elaborated on his remark in any manner during his Nuremberg testimony.

More likely than LGR's fanciful reading, which introduces into this simple reply, to a question about persecution, an unsubstantiated, even paranoid implication, is that Sutzkever misremembered what he'd heard or knew about Ponar.

And what might Sutzkever have known or heard about Ponar? I have already mentioned that Ponar had a train depot. (Victims were generally brought to the site by truck, sometimes by automobile, with Sakowicz recording some license plate numbers - but the "Kovno" transport, discussed upthread, was brought by train.) Also, according to Sakowicz's journal, Jews' stolen belongings were held there in "[t]he barn - the central clothing depot, from which the clothes are carried away at the end after they have been packed into sacks" (23 July 1941). Sakowicz himself lived in a small dwelling near the site, as did a number of other Poles and some Lithuanians, many of them peasants and some whose names are given in Sakowicz's journal. It was some of these peasants who rescued Schloss, Trojak, Katz, and other survivors, as both Kruk and Sakowicz reported. Sakowicz referred to the area near where the shootings occurred, in fact, as "the Ponary colony" and "Ponary - the settlement" (early August 1941). A map Sakowicz made of the area shows 5 structures between the RR tracks and a wooded area and next to a fenced-in section labeled "Base" (the murder site). One peasant, Kiejzik, was taken from his "apartment" "in Ponary" and shot along with Jewish victims for on 17 September 1941 for stealing victims' watches for personal use (it is not clear whether Kiejzik was killed or only wounded, albeit severely, in the face). There was also a "little chapel" near the killing site (25 October 1941; also shown on the far side of the wooded area on Sakowicz's map). Sakowicz wrote of a killing action on 25 October 1941 during which "the procession neared the [RR] crossing [at] exactly 8:52" and completed filing by at "9:17"; when shots began to be heard, "The condemned began to get nervous. One of them turned to Wysocki, who was standing next to the hut, and asked, 'What is this place?'" (Wysocki answered "Po-na-ry," confirming the worst fears of the victims, who began weeping and trying to find ways to escape.)

Why do I mention all this excruciating detail, some of it probably known to Sutzkever (the layout and buildings at Ponar), some not (details about the trucks, the killing process and how the site was used to kill and steal, specific incidents, and so on)? Because Sutzkever's reference, given his second-hand knowledge of the shootings and that he was testifying from memory, to Jews being taken to buildings at Ponar - and then not being heard from again - is an understandable bit of confusion, especially since even Sakowicz describes Jews being processed next to a hut. Other testimonies do not mention a hut - only dunes, hills, ditches, bushes, woods, fence, gates, barbed wire, etc. - and also that the victims were sometimes blindfolded - but Sakowicz was there, not just once, to be shot, but day after day, action after action, writing about what he saw. It is no stretch at all to conclude it likely that garbled word of shootings, hills, pits, huts, etc. made its way back to Vilna and listeners like Sutzkever. Note too that Sutzkever doesn't say that Jews were murdered in buildings at the site, as LGR tries to make out, only that the victims were, Sutzkever understood, herded into a building at some point in the process, after which they disappeared. How this understandable error - and I think it is an error, for I know of no description of the Ponar killings except Sutzkever's that has Jews rounded up into buildings at Ponar - transforms into Sutzkever's making up a story about gas chambers is something LGR will have to explain to us.
 
Last edited:
I'm becoming more and more certain that these guys are nothing but repulsive trolls.


THIS JUST IN:

170604ecae9ba23d2e.gif

REPULSIVE TROLLS


In other news:


170604807f6b0e6afb.jpg

CATHOLIC


170604807f8553e874.jpg

[Rule10]S IN THE WOODS



170604807f6db0f936.jpg

STILL DEAD

:rolleyes:
 

For everyone's information, one of the Tehran Conference participants, Christian Lindtner, has declared his apostasy from denier dogma and been attacked ferociously by the dwindling number of true believers.

Lindtner is still an extremely odd duck, but has seen through the tactics and dishonesties, and now has a blog attacking deniers, Holocaust Denial Is Chutzpah.
 
For everyone's information, one of the Tehran Conference participants, Christian Lindtner, has declared his apostasy from denier dogma and been attacked ferociously by the dwindling number of true believers.

Lindtner is still an extremely odd duck, but has seen through the tactics and dishonesties, and now has a blog attacking deniers, Holocaust Denial Is Chutzpah.

Apostasy means to fall away from the truth.
 
No, "apostasy" means to reject an article of faith, from the Greek for "to stand away from."
 
Apostasy means to fall away from the truth.

Didn't your mother tell you it was wrong to make up lies, Clayton?


http://www.thefreedictionary.com/apostasy

abandonment of one's religious faith, party, a cause, etc.
relinquishing of a religious belief. — apostate, n., adj.
Abandonment or renunciation of one's religion or morals.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/apostasy

a total desertion of or departure from one's religion, principles, party, cause, etc.

http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/american/apostasy

a refusal to accept religious or political beliefs anymore

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apostasy

1: renunciation of a religious faith
2: abandonment of a previous loyalty : defection

Middle English apostasie, from Late Latin apostasia, from Greek, literally, revolt, from aphistasthai to revolt, from apo- + histasthai to stand — more at stand


Nothing about truth in there.

Dave
 
When Clayton Moore finishes reminiscing on the true meaning of "apostate" maybe he can account for the 6 million people that "disappeared" in what he calls a massive holohoax, Or maybe he can "prove" how Hitler was such a nice guy... Maybe GLR wants to give it a shot? Maybe another denier?

The sort of holocaust denial taking place in this thread's namesake is pretty sickening.
 
Last edited:
When Clayton Moore finishes reminiscing on the true meaning of "apostate" maybe he can account for the 6 million people that "disappeared" in what he calls a massive holohoax, Or maybe he can "prove" how Hitler was such a nice guy... Maybe GLR wants to give it a shot? Maybe another denier?

The sort of holocaust denial taking place in this thread's namesake is pretty sickening.


If six million people have disappeared, then they are missing. If they are dead then they are dead. Once again, there are many possible fates for the Jews of Europe during WWII other than 1) survive or 2) intentionally murdered by the Nazis, some of them in gas chambers, as part of a plan to exterminate all the Jews of Europe.

What you call sickening is what many would call enlightening. This latest diversion into the forest is a result of Pesye Schloss being nominated as a "credible eyewitness" to the holocaust. A second hand account from a person who exists in no other place except for a diary that was published sixteen years after the end of the war is considered a "credible" eyewitness--one that is as credible as tens of thousands of other eyewitnesses. That's just funny. Not ha ha funny but weird funny. No actually it's ha ha funny too.

If you'll excuse me I need to get ready for the day we thank Dog that the people our European ancestors met when they arrived on this continent didn't have wheels, horses, or gunpowder.
 
When Clayton Moore finishes reminiscing on the true meaning of "apostate" maybe he can account for the 6 million people that "disappeared" in what he calls a massive holohoax, Or maybe he can "prove" how Hitler was such a nice guy... Maybe GLR wants to give it a shot? Maybe another denier?

The sort of holocaust denial taking place in this thread's namesake is pretty sickening.

What's sickening is the parade of liars who have imprinted your Holocaust on Christians worldwide. The liars who testified at the war trials. Eli Weisel who lied about being in death camps and who somehow lost his camp tattoo. Steven Spielberg who blatantly lies in his Holocaust productions and gets rewarded for them.
 
What's sickening is the parade of liars who have imprinted your Holocaust on Christians worldwide. The liars who testified at the war trials. Eli Weisel who lied about being in death camps and who somehow lost his camp tattoo. Steven Spielberg who blatantly lies in his Holocaust productions and gets rewarded for them.

But remember, Clayton's not a Holocaust Denier or a Jew Hater!
 
What you call sickening is what many would call enlightening.

That seems a stretch. There are maybe only six or seven of you on this entire forum, several of whom don't appear to follow this thread and some of whom are self-confessed trolls, or have recently touted the Protocols of the Elders of Zion as apparently genuine, while others are so incapable of addressing the subject that their first attempts to rejoin the thread after a week's suspension are immediately sent to AAH. Then there's the guy who tried to ban the use of the term Holocaust denier while remaining entirely blind to his own rhetoric. And then there's a noob here who tried to convince the hardcore nutters at CODOH that nuclear bombs are a hoax, and has turned up here to try and do the same, dripping the usual disdain displayed by every single other kook in the history of crankery, telling people who have worked with nuclear reactors on submariens that they're liars.

Are you really sure you want to appeal to the denier peanut gallery on JREF? Because the lurkers don't seem too enamoured of the whole thing.
 
If six million people have disappeared, then they are missing. If they are dead then they are dead. Once again, there are many possible fates for the Jews of Europe during WWII other than 1) survive or 2) intentionally murdered by the Nazis, some of them in gas chambers, as part of a plan to exterminate all the Jews of Europe.
And the reason you ran away when asked to explain what happened to the Jews missing from Vilna by December 1941 - is what? These Jews were certainly not murdered in gas chambers by the Nazis - so go for it. Tell us what became of them. How. Why. Citing evidence. We are talking about a few 10s of 1000s, not 5+ million. Oh, and as you explain, and as you cite evidence, please be sure to explain all the evidence.
 
And the reason you ran away when asked to explain what happened to the Jews missing from Vilna by December 1941 - is what? These Jews were certainly not murdered in gas chambers by the Nazis - so go for it. Tell us what became of them. How. Why. Citing evidence. We are talking about a few 10s of 1000s, not 5+ million. Oh, and as you explain, and as you cite evidence, please be sure to explain all the evidence.


I never really doubted the mass shootings. I thought they were fairly well documented. The stupid stuff about heaving ground and geysers of blood I dismissed as the fanciful musings of the economically depressed and incredibly dwarfish Ostjuden. But as to what happened to the Jews of Vilna by December 1941? I don't know. I'd say they were probably shot as long there's credible testimony that that is what happened and some evidence of mass graves besides a monument and a report from some Soviet extraordinary commission. You do have more than several Pesye Schloss', don't you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom