It's all baloney. But if you want to go over all that again, one question at a time, please.
Wow. Im still waiting for you to answer any of the questions you have ducked so far. Answer them one at a time if you want. But i see no reason to repeat them again. Your "one at a time" is yet more ducking. What the heck, here's the list, pick one, answer it, pick the next, take as many posts as you want. We have been patient this long...
How matter explode from the "entry wound" on multiple trajectories in an "explosion" of a fragmenting bullet if a teeny tiny entry wound only allows for one direction?
Why is the "entry" ejecta visible on the Z film but no exit wound ejecta visible from the back of the head?
Why is no ejacta visible over the top of the seats or the trunk of the limo in any photographs?
Why does the interview you posted not show any sings that Jackie had to scoop up any brain from the hood, or had time to do so before claiming she had the brain in her hands?
Why on the death stare photo, when uncropped, is there a large exit wound on the top of the front of the head?
Why is there no exit wound on the back of the head in the z film or poloroid, or the uncropped death stare photograph?
At what point would the vast exit wound become visible on the back of his head?
Had a frangible bullet removed, as sources posted by you suggested Robert, that the back of JFKs head was missing and the brain had "gone" and was no longer there, how were the components of a fragmented bullet able to remain in the head? Why were they not ejected with the matter they forced out?
Why have you failed to produce material evidence to support the existence of a large exit wound on the back of JFKs head?
Take your time. If you answer those one at a time, then go ahead. But there is no reason you should not answer them all.
