JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

[Rich_C]

The Final Nail​

blah, blah, blah

tl; dr

You're only supposed to answer one question at a time! Your rules.

 

[RoboTimbo]

<snip repeat of already debunked anecdotes>

"I'm just a patsy"

How does that explain the large exit wound we see in the right front of the Kennedy's head? The one we see in the Zapruder film? The exit wound we see in the Zapruder film is consistent with a shot from the rear, as you so cleverly showed us in the video you posted earlier and in the website you posted about entry/exit wounds.

Why do you continue to slink away from answering that?

 

[Spyke]

I was wondering, when the shot came from the 6th floor, how come it didn't blow out the front (yes front lol ) lower part of his face?

I know I'm not going to be able to explain this properly, but if the shooter is up on the 6th and is firing "down the street" and hit JFK roughly behind the ear, would that not blow out more down towards his cheek area?

I should say here that as much as I find the idea of a conspiracy and multiple shooters...what's the word..interesting, I don't see any compelling evidence to make me believe such a thing.

I've just always wondered why the shot come out where it did, top right front of his head as opposed to lower down on his face.

Was it because he was slumped over from the first shot (when Jackie was leaning over looking at him) while he was grabbing his throat? Did this put his head in line for the bullets trajectory?

As a small aside, Jesus Jackie is lucky she didn't get HER head blown off. I can't even imagine the shock she must have received..

 

[Tomtomkent]

As shown in the plethora of documents iRatant and walter posted the notch of the bullet exiting the skull is consistent with the line of far. What caused the ejecta was the trauma, the pressure wave passing through the body. Thin skull and gooey brains will burst before solid cheeks and jaw bones.

 

[Tomtomkent]

Any bets the "final" nail is about as final as Final Fantasy?

 

[Walter Ego]

I Have Seen The Light!

Any bets the "final" nail is about as final as Final Fantasy?

I, for one, am thoroughly convinced by Robert's Final Nail.

NOT!

 

[Spyke]

I see what you are saying..looked a lot more closely at more of the evidence. Makes sense to me, thanks.

 

[Noztradamus]

I was wondering, when the shot came from the 6th floor, how come it didn't blow out the front (yes front lol ) lower part of his face?

I know I'm not going to be able to explain this properly, but if the shooter is up on the 6th and is firing "down the street" and hit JFK roughly behind the ear, would that not blow out more down towards his cheek area?

I should say here that as much as I find the idea of a conspiracy and multiple shooters...what's the word..interesting, I don't see any compelling evidence to make me believe such a thing.

I've just always wondered why the shot come out where it did, top right front of his head as opposed to lower down on his face.

Was it because he was slumped over from the first shot (when Jackie was leaning over looking at him) while he was grabbing his throat? Did this put his head in line for the bullets trajectory?

~~~~

Yes, by Z frame 312, he had slumped so far forward that for the line of fire to emerge in his lower face Oswald would have had to have been on the 30th floor of the TBD.

 

[bynmdsue]

Mr. Ruby:... And all I want to do is tell the truth, and that is all. There was no conspiracy.


http://karws.gso.uri.edu/jfk/issues_and_evidence/jack_ruby/Ruby_WCR_testimony_1.html

 

[Robert Prey]

How does that explain the large exit wound we see in the right front of the Kennedy's head? The one we see in the Zapruder film? The exit wound we see in the Zapruder film is consistent with a shot from the rear, as you so cleverly showed us in the video you posted earlier and in the website you posted about entry/exit wounds.

Why do you continue to slink away from answering that?

I dol not address questions that have already been repeatedly answered. If you are comforted by your fantasy, then good for you.

 

[Robert Prey]

In fact that seems to be entirely constructed of annectdotes. No material evidence. Just supposition and hearsay.

How nice. So how can we be sure 58 people were more honest than 32 who said the shot did not come from the grassy knoll? A guy is claiming he lied under oath, so why do we assume honesty now?

Why believe any stories of who would or would not have liked to shoot JFK whenwe have footage of him being shot from behind. We do see an entry wound behind the ear, we doseethe exit wound exploding out the front of the head. We see NO exit wound to the back of the head. At all. No ejecta. No brains for Jackie to pick up.

If there was a man with a rifle on the grassy knoll all he did was watch LHO shoot JFK in the back of the head.

Nonsense. Most of what is presented is direct testimony. What hearsay there is, is for the most part independently corroborated.

 

[Walter Ego]

I do not address questions that {I} have already been repeatedly {avoiding} answer{ing}.

Fixed that for you.

 

[Robert Prey]

Argumentum ad populum. If many believe so, it is so.

No, you've missed the point, which is, as Lincoln said, "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Excepting the Deep Thinkers on this board, of course.

 

[TheRedWorm]

You cannot fool video evidence. The video evidence is conclusive of a shot from above and behind JFK. No amount of wall-o-text can change that.

 

[Tomtomkent]

I dol not address questions that have already been repeatedly answered. If you are comforted by your fantasy, then good for you.

Really? So point us towards the post where you reconcile your fragmentation bullet theory with the picture you insist is accurate, and the parkland statements you insist are accurate.

 

[Tomtomkent]

Nonsense. Most of what is presented is direct testimony. What hearsay there is, is for the most part independently corroborated.

So call you statement nonsense. Then vindicate it by confirming it is hearsay and testemony, not material evidence. So I was speaking factually correct nonsense then?

 

[Tomtomkent]

No, you've missed the point, which is, as Lincoln said, "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Excepting the Deep Thinkers on this board, of course.

And you miss the point. 90 people were questioned. 58 said one thing. 32 another. You have not supplied evidence that the 32 were wrong or the 58 right. The bigger number doesnot equate to more correct.

58 people also dont change the filmed footage of the event. Nor the rifle Oswald bought, photographed himself holding, then left in a snipers nest. A thousand people wouldn't change that. Or a billion. The number of people doesn't make it right.


Why don't you believe the 32 people Rob? Are they not as nice as the 58? Are they not as trustworthy as a guy who admitted lying? LYING!

 

[I Ratant]

The Final Nail​

From the video....
.
And of course, the persons named as murderers are all dead now, right?
Imagine the lawsuits if any aren't and take umbrage at the slander.

 

[Robert Prey]

And you miss the point. 90 people were questioned. 58 said one thing. 32 another. You have not supplied evidence that the 32 were wrong or the 58 right. The bigger number doesnot equate to more correct.

58 people also dont change the filmed footage of the event. Nor the rifle Oswald bought, photographed himself holding, then left in a snipers nest. A thousand people wouldn't change that. Or a billion. The number of people doesn't make it right.


Why don't you believe the 32 people Rob? Are they not as nice as the 58? Are they not as trustworthy as a guy who admitted lying? LYING!

You are confused. Again. The point was that 72% of those polled by CBS in 2004 believed the assassination was the result of a conspiracy. The shots witnesses heard from the grassy knoll is another topic, but only points out that a whole lot of people heard them which does not lend itself to the veracity of a Lone Nutter theory..

 

[bynmdsue]

You are confused. Again. The point was that 72% of those polled by CBS in 2004 believed the assassination was the result of a conspiracy. The shots witnesses heard from the grassy knoll is another topic, but only points out that a whole lot of people heard them which does not lend itself to the veracity of a Lone Nutter theory..

Are you sure HE'S the one confused? You may have not shot yourself in the foot again this time but it's definately more appropriate that you missed it by a country mile.