Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

[7forever]

Here's a cool rewind of NY1's orb. The orb came from the Newark side/west and slightly north. It floated over the Hudson River @40-50 mph.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkS6G783aq8&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=122&feature=plpp_video

 

[George 152]

And yet why is it you keep showing us video of airplanes flying into the buildings?

He's not the brightest candle in the pack....
The second aircraft impact on the WTC was videoed from more than one site.
Along with the witnesses who observed the crash from different points so it's impossible for the CGI claim

 

[carlitos]

More blurry movies with plane crashes. This thread was more entertaining when it was spelled "waring."

 

[7forever]

And yet why is it you keep showing us video of airplanes flying into the buildings?

You never posted any video showing a 767 fly into any buildings. I've shown images of laughable cgi's, real planes and the orb.

 

[7forever]

More blurry movies with plane crashes. This thread was more entertaining when it was spelled "waring."

You'll never move past posting on forums. This place is a nice Comfort zone for all folks who won't refuse their willful ignorance. Randi Org is the best forum for shooting in the dark.

 

[A W Smith]

You never posted any video showing a 767 fly into any buildings. I've shown images of laughable cgi's, real planes and the orb.

 

[twinstead]

You'll never move past posting on forums. This place is a nice Comfort zone for all folks who won't refuse their willful ignorance. Randi Org is the best forum for shooting in the dark.

And when exactly do you plan on bringing your explosive evidence of no planes to somewhere other than the internet?

 

[7forever]

He's not the brightest candle in the pack....
The second aircraft impact on the WTC was videoed from more than one site.
Along with the witnesses who observed the crash from different points so it's impossible for the CGI claim

There are 3 distinctly different flight paths with silly cgi's and the path of the orb which is 75% consistent. There's a fake west, divebomb, and south to north cgi.

 

[A W Smith]

There are 3 distinctly different flight paths with silly cgi's and the path of the orb which is 75% consistent. There's a fake west, divebomb, and south to north cgi.

No there isnt, There are different camera locations that you, as an ignorant child, cannot resolve.

 

[7forever]

And when exactly do you plan on bringing your explosive evidence of no planes to somewhere other than the internet?

As soon you start proving the plane myth. There has been no attempt to prove the plane theory beyond showing fake images on TV, hence the reason no attempt has ever been made.

 

[7forever]

No there isnt, There are different camera locations that you, as an ignorant child, cannot resolve.

No there isnt, The camera angles cannot change where the fake images were in the relation to the towers. The fake west plane is west and does not change because of camera angle...sorry.

 

[DGM]

As soon you start proving the plane myth. There has been no attempt to prove the plane theory beyond showing fake images on TV, hence the reason no attempt has ever been made.

You know what would be real fun, If you could show how real airplanes became "orbs" while being tracked on radar the whole time.

 

[NoahFence]

As soon you start proving the plane myth. There has been no attempt to prove the plane theory beyond showing fake images on TV, hence the reason no attempt has ever been made.

Lie.

 

[7forever]

And when exactly do you plan on bringing your explosive evidence of no planes to somewhere other than the internet?

Your explosive evidence amounts to accepting an assinine story that has neve been proven beyond fooling the ignorant masses by way of 5 TV networks who did the job of selling that myth.

 

[A W Smith]

As soon you start proving the plane myth. There has been no attempt to prove the plane theory beyond showing fake images on TV, hence the reason no attempt has ever been made.

your fallacy is the shift of burden of proof, you have failed to prove that the videos were faked CGI. We have a preponderance of evidence, witnesses, plane debris, radar tracks, dna of the passengers retrieved from the site, Live video feeds, and personal video all confirming beyond a shadow of a doubt that flights 11 and 175 crashing into the north and south towers that day.

 

[7forever]

You know what would be real fun, If you could show how real airplanes became "orbs" while being tracked on radar the whole time.

You know what would be real fun, If anyone could explain how an orb could be a boeing 767. And, how the initial news reptiles either didn't see it or mistook it for a chopper.

 

[A W Smith]

No there isnt, The camera angles cannot change where the fake images were in the relation to the towers. The fake west plane is west and does not change because of camera angle...sorry.

yes, yes they can, show us the location and altitude of the cameras to prove your claim that they were faked, you have failed to do so.

 

[NoahFence]

Your explosive evidence amounts to accepting an assinine story that has neve been proven beyond fooling the ignorant masses by way of 5 TV networks who did the job of selling that myth.

...And the thousands of people on the ground with no access to a television?

 

[DGM]

You know what would be real fun, If anyone could explain how an orb could be a boeing 767. And, how the initial news reptiles either didn't see it or mistook it for a chopper.

Your use of highly compressed Youtube videos.

(I won't touch the "reptiles" thing because I have no idea what you're talking about).

 

[7forever]

your fallacy is the shift of burden of proof, you have failed to prove that the videos were faked CGI. We have a preponderance of evidence, witnesses, plane debris, radar tracks, dna of the passengers retrieved from the site, Live video feeds, and personal video all confirming beyond a shadow of a doubt that flights 11 and 175 crashing into the north and south towers that day.

The passengers have no part in the truth because flight 175 didn't show up for the south tower. The passengers are moot until a plane can be identified. You have that burden, not the truth of no 175. Reasonable doubt has been raised with just chopper 4 nbc showing an orb and no plane in sight.