Occupy Wall Street better defend its identity

Status
Not open for further replies.
Occutard caught on camera:



On the 17th, we going to burn New York City to the ******* ground.

Edited by jhunter1163: 
Edited for Rule 10.


…

Ain’t no more talking, They got guns we got bodies. They got bricks we got rocks. Let’s see what they got.

[Young man in the background] They got missiles, we got bombs.

I want them…I want them to make that decision so they can see…in a few days you going to see what a molotov cocktail can do to Macy’s.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Virus said:
They're coherent in their steadfast denial of anything that brings negative publicity.
Click to expand...

Pretty much. Given enough time for the news to interview everyone, I'm sure we'd have eventually learned that nobody at Zuccotti Park was a "real" member of the 99%.
 
JihadJane said:
'Occupy Wall Street Declares Goldman Sachs Guilty

General Assembly holds mock trial and journalist Chris Hedges reads indictment accusing Goldman Sachs of financial crimes against humanity'

Click to expand...

Hedges is such a joke. He claims in that video that many families "literally starve". I can only assume that Hedges doesn't know the meaning of the word "literally".

I do love the way these weenies piss and moan about their first amendment rights to assemble. Yet given power they'd be the first to do away with constitutional protections for everybody else.
 
Virus said:
Chris Hedges is a huge, massive dildo.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that's a pretty douche-bag thing to do. A graduation speech is simply not the appropriate place for a deeply partisan screed of any sort. It's a time to celebrate the graduating class, not push your own agenda. He's a selfish, self-centered, egotistical prick.
 
That's the problem with leftists. Love the sound of their own voice and think everyone is interested in their stupid crap. They're worse than religious people.
 
Last edited:
Ziggurat said:
Yeah, that's a pretty douche-bag thing to do. A graduation speech is simply not the appropriate place for a deeply partisan screed of any sort. It's a time to celebrate the graduating class, not push your own agenda. He's a selfish, self-centered, egotistical prick.
Click to expand...

Graduates don't need fairy tales. Chris Hedges has a very well developed social conscience. Your childish abuse is pathetic.

Alt+F4 said:
"For a Judgment Pursuant to Articles 78, 30, and 63 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, and 42 USC §§ 1983 and 1988"

I see you didn't bother reading the judge's ruling. In addition...

"Protected speech is not equally permissible in all places and at all times."(Snyder v Phelps,131SCt1207, 1218 [2011],quoting Cornelius v NAACP Legal Defense & Ed. Fund, Inc.,473 US 788, 799 [1985].)"
Click to expand...

Thanks for the numbers.
 
JihadJane said:
Graduates don't need fairy tales. Chris Hedges has a very well developed social conscience. Your childish abuse is pathetic.
Click to expand...

See I told you. Jane thinks they're privileged to listen to Hedge's left-wing agitprop.
 
Last edited:
Virus said:
That's the problem with leftists. Love the sound of their own voice and think everyone is interested in their stupid crap. They're worse than religious people.
Click to expand...

Nah, they're not worse, but fanatics are basically all alike. They have very little life outside of their own brand of fanaticism, which is why they always keep bringing up the topic and never, ever in a light-hearted, jocular manner.
 
Survivor of Communism visits Occupy LA camp:



Conclusion: OWS is a tantrum for rich, spoilt, envious little overgrown children.
 
Last edited:
About Occupy Wall Street, does it have any identity other than screaming "row row fight the power" as though they believe Gurren Lagann is a viable political theory?
 
NWO Sentryman said:
About Occupy Wall Street, does it have any identity other than screaming "row row fight the power" as though they believe Gurren Lagann is a viable political theory?
Click to expand...

Your post has already been made several hundred times throughout this forum.
 
WildCat said:
You're right, Ron Paul wants to destroy all banks and in fact our entire financial and economic system. That's why we call them libertards. It's hard to argue policy with lunatics like Ron Paul.
Click to expand...

Are you arguing OWS wants to eliminate fractional reserve banking?
Click to expand...

No. I have been arguing that OWS doesn't want to give the banks an easy ride, which you seemed to take an exception to, because you believe(d) that OWS could be, 'about anything'. You asserted that some OWS protesters (particularly the Ron Paul supporters) wanted to give the banks an easy ride. I'm glad that you now recognise that this is not true.

Moving on to the banks, do you think they have been well regulated in the last decade? What do you think were the primary causes of the 2008 crisis? I'm interested in your opinion.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom