• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

Status
Not open for further replies.
There's more to it than just that. It's instructive as to how a criminal government in consort with a compliant news media can literally brainwash a nation into believing a Big Lie.

Oh I thought for a minute you were concerned that the government killed a man.

Also at what point did it dawn on you that the government and media occasionally lie to the people?
 
Why does the Zapruder film show the right front of Kennedy's head blowing out from the exit wound?

Did someone switch Kennedy's head on the way to Parkland?

Did someone shoot Kennedy from the front after the end of the Zapruder film so that we don't see it?

You've still failed to answer this, Robert.
 
The evidence of course is Jackie trying to retrieve the brains blow-out. Try to explain that.

I asked you to show me the large jagged exit wound on the back of JFK's head in the Zapruter frames I provided which is what we should see according to the forensic description of an exit wound that you yourself posted if, as you claim, JFK was shot from the front and you show me what you claim is Jackie Kennedy scrambling across the trunk of the presidential limo trying to retrieve the JFK "brains blow-out"?

The brains that came out of the invisible exit wound in the back of JFK's head. The exit wound that can't be seen in the Zapruter film. The invisible exit wound that is a relative of the dog who ate your homework.

Please, Robert, don't make us laugh at you.
 
Last edited:
Seems to me there is released pressure in a balloon and a skull, but none in a melon. The best evidence of what really happened is the condition of the head wound according to first hand witnesses. And that's what you guys just can't deal with.


Translation: My claim of a shot from the Grass Knoll is directly contradicted by the forensic description of entrance and exit wounds that I posted myself and by the visual evidence of the Zapruter film and my attempted use of the jet effect to explain the front of JFK's exploding similarly backfired so I am falling back again on my "unimpeachable" Parkland Hospital witnesses. I have painted myself into a corner and this is all I have.
 
Last edited:
Translation: My claim of a shot from the Grass Knoll is directly contradicted by the forensic description of entrance and exit wounds that I posted myself and by the visual evidence of the Zapruter film and my attempted use of the jet effect to explain the front of JFK's exploding similarly backfired so I am falling back on my "unimpeachable" Parkland Hospital witnesses.

Yeah, right. So where exactly in this pic is that massive exit wound at the right temple??????

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I asked you to show me the large jagged exit wound on the back of JFK's head in the Zapruter frames I provided which is what we should see according to the forensic description of an exit wound that you yourself posted and you show me what you claim is Jackie Kennedy scrambling across the trunk of the presidential limo trying to retrieve the JFK "brains blow-out"?

The brains that came out of the invisible exit wound in the back of JFK's head. The exit wound that can't be seen in the Zapruter film. The invisible exit wound that is a relative of the dog who ate your homework.

Please, Robert, don't make us laugh at you.

And where is that large exit wound you keep harping about at the right temple??? And please don't cry if you can't find it.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey, Robert: Have you ever fired a gun?


Yes. But never in anger. Here is someone who has:

A combat-hardened ex-Marine and police sharpshooter Craig Roberts, author of "Kill Zone: A Sniper Looks at Dealey Plaza", asked,

"How in the world could anyone look at that {Zapruder} film and say that the fatal head strike had come from the rear? The so-called experts who stated that the rearward jerk of Kennedy's head was due to 'muscle reaction,' 'jet force from an erupting bullet' or some other violation of the laws of physics, had obviously never served in combat, where witnessing high-velocity bullet strikes was commonplace...

"Some of the supporters of the Warren Commission...stated that the bullet came from the rear because the eruption of brain matter and blood came out of the front of the president's skull. I saw something else. In a head shot, the exit wound, due to the buildup of hydrostatic pressure, explodes in a conical formation in the down-range direction of the bullet. Yet in the Zapruder film, I could plainly see that the eruption was not a conical shape to the front of the limo, but instead was an explosion that cast fragments both up and down in a vertical plane, and side to side in a horizontal plane. There was only one explanation for this: an exploding or 'frangible' bullet. Such a round explodes on impact--in exactly the manner depicted in the film."

http://www.jfklancer.com/sbt-1.html
 
So if you have fired a gun, why are you thinking that a bullet behaves in a manner that they do not?
 
And where is that large exit wound you keep harping about at the right temple??? And please don't cry if you can't find it.

I've never said there was an exit wound on JFK's right temple. I've said there was an exit wound in the front of JFK's head which is clearly visible in the Zapruter film, the film that contradicts your Parkland witnesses. Where does that picture you keep posting come from? I thought you said the JFK autopsy photos were under lock and key until 2017.
 
Last edited:
Yes. But never in anger. Here is someone who has:

A combat-hardened ex-Marine and police sharpshooter Craig Roberts, author of "Kill Zone: A Sniper Looks at Dealey Plaza", asked,

"How in the world could anyone look at that {Zapruder} film and say that the fatal head strike had come from the rear? The so-called experts who stated that the rearward jerk of Kennedy's head was due to 'muscle reaction,' 'jet force from an erupting bullet' or some other violation of the laws of physics, had obviously never served in combat, where witnessing high-velocity bullet strikes was commonplace...

"Some of the supporters of the Warren Commission...stated that the bullet came from the rear because the eruption of brain matter and blood came out of the front of the president's skull. I saw something else. In a head shot, the exit wound, due to the buildup of hydrostatic pressure, explodes in a conical formation in the down-range direction of the bullet. Yet in the Zapruder film, I could plainly see that the eruption was not a conical shape to the front of the limo, but instead was an explosion that cast fragments both up and down in a vertical plane, and side to side in a horizontal plane. There was only one explanation for this: an exploding or 'frangible' bullet. Such a round explodes on impact--in exactly the manner depicted in the film."

http://www.jfklancer.com/sbt-1.html

Do these frangible bullets also have the ability to curve in midair so that JFK would be hit from the front and not on the side of the head which is what would have had to happen if that shot came from the knoll.


ETA - At least you're now admitting that the front of the head exploded and the drawing showing the back of the head blown out is wrong.
 
Last edited:
If you're going to post graphic pictures to support your arguments, please remember to use the NSFW tag, thus:

[NSFW=Graphic image]Insert image here[/NSFW]

Thank you.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: kmortis
 
JFK had Addison's disease, which embrittles bones. The skull is a bone.
The bullet entering the rear of the skull created fractures in the skull.
The hydrostatic pressure of the bullet's passage caused the expansion of the brain material and the fractures it created when it exited the right front of the head caused the fragmentation of the bone in the fracture area.
The pressure forced the pieces loose. One of which is seen flying up out of the skull in Z-313, to be found on the infield later, and termed "The Harper Fragment", and sent to DC.
This Ida Dox drawing of the autopsy photograph of the wound in the rear of the head shows the entrance hole. The autopsist's hand is in the large defect in the right front of the skull... EXACTLY like the photograph.
Note: the drawings were used in lieu of the photographs because our society at that time had not sunk to the disgusting level it is today, where dismemberments and autopsys are shown on prime time tv, with all the blood and gore and filth that the general public today can stomach.
Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwww!
 

Attachments

  • Dox Drawing-rear entrance wound.jpg
    Dox Drawing-rear entrance wound.jpg
    30.5 KB · Views: 5
  • DoxEntranceWound.jpg
    DoxEntranceWound.jpg
    67 KB · Views: 1
JFK had Addison's disease, which embrittles bones. The skull is a bone.
The bullet entering the rear of the skull created fractures in the skull.
The hydrostatic pressure of the bullet's passage caused the expansion of the brain material and the fractures it created when it exited the right front of the head caused the fragmentation of the bone in the fracture area.
The pressure forced the pieces loose. One of which is seen flying up out of the skull in Z-313, to be found on the infield later, and termed "The Harper Fragment", and sent to DC.
This Ida Dox drawing of the autopsy photograph of the wound in the rear of the head shows the entrance hole. The autopsist's hand is in the large defect in the right front of the skull... EXACTLY like the photograph.
Note: the drawings were used in lieu of the photographs because our society at that time had not sunk to the disgusting level it is today, where dismemberments and autopsys are shown on prime time tv, with all the blood and gore and filth that the general public today can stomach.
Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwww!

The drawings were used to cover up the truth. Obviously.
 
Do these frangible bullets also have the ability to curve in midair so that JFK would be hit from the front and not on the side of the head which is what would have had to happen if that shot came from the knoll.


ETA - At least you're now admitting that the front of the head exploded and the drawing showing the back of the head blown out is wrong.

Nonsense.
 
Nonsense.

I'll take that to mean you have no counter argument. At least we're getting somewhere.

Indistinguishable from parody.

Exactly what I was thinking. Had to read that one over a couple times to be sure it said what I thought it said. There aren't enough irony meters on the planet for that comment.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom