• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

Status
Not open for further replies.
vtbub said:
Sadly, this conspiracy theory is still the most believed despite the mountains of evidence that points to Oswald. The Single Bullet Theory was never all that well explained until Dale Myers correctly placed Governor Connally correctly in the limo. Once we see how the two men lined up, we go from is that how they were wounded to of course that is how that happened.

Oswald never got his trial. If he did then this nonsense would have gone away.
Click to expand...
.
Myers was originally in the CT crowd, and got severely taken over the coals by the Twinkies when he saw the light...
http://www.jfkfiles.com/
His animation is almost true to life. Considering the advances in CGI since then, it would be possible to have all the figures in the animation look like the actual people.
I had done something similar in AutoCad in the early '90s, but on a 286 computer, which seriously limited any advanced animation.
Myers' work will probably never be duplicated.
 
I Ratant said:
.
You silly!
RP is going to reveal it was Colonel Mustard in the library with the candlestick!
Stay tuned!
Click to expand...

It looks like everyone was shooting at Kennedy. His wife, the driver, the guy under the sewer lid, the grassy knoll and someone in the school book depository, I'm amazed that someone didn't get hurt what with all the stray bullets.

Then to get to all the doctors to cover it up, well the organization is fantastic.
 
kookbreaker said:
There'd still be more than a few cranks - look at the Mumia case for example, but yeah it wouldn't be as big.
Click to expand...

Or those who deny the Holocaust or some of the other out there things you read on this board.

Look, and this really isn't directed at you, there should be a healthy amount of skepticism when reading and official conclusion whether it's this or Pearl Harbor or 9/11. The key is that is what I'm reading plausible?

With Pearl Harbor, we have enough documents from both sides to agree with the congressional inquiry. In fact, the inquiry was extremely well done.

The 9/11 Commission and the successful trail of Moussoui paints enough of a picture and points out what we got wrong to be extremely credible. Throw in the NIST stuff, which is way over my head, and they all proved the accusation.

Because Arlen Specter came up with the SBT AND it was presented as a theory, it put a lot of doubt on to what else they guessed wrong. History has exonerated the WC. Oswald would have been easily convicted for Tippit's murder and the evidence they had on him for JFK was extremely strong.
 
I Ratant said:
.
Myers was originally in the CT crowd, and got severely taken over the coals by the Twinkies when he saw the light...
(not allowed to quote the link)
His animation is almost true to life. Considering the advances in CGI since then, it would be possible to have all the figures in the animation look like the actual people.
I had done something similar in AutoCad in the early '90s, but on a 286 computer, which seriously limited any advanced animation.
Myers' work will probably never be duplicated.
Click to expand...

Same goes for Gary Mack, correct?
 
tsig said:
It looks like everyone was shooting at Kennedy. His wife, the driver, the guy under the sewer lid, the grassy knoll and someone in the school book depository, I'm amazed that someone didn't get hurt what with all the stray bullets.

Then to get to all the doctors to cover it up, well the organization is fantastic.
Click to expand...

All done by two anti-castro cubans who we know were in on it with LHO because they told this woman LHO was going to shoot JFK?
 
vtbub said:
Same goes for Gary Mack, correct?
Click to expand...
.
I haven't been following Gary for a long time. We did lots of communicating on one of the JFK forums, which since then has lost all the stuff from 1998 due to hacking.
 
Tomtomkent said:

THEN HOW CAN TWO PEOPLE "CONSPIRE" WITH HIM TO COMMIT A CRIME HE WAS NOT INTENDING TO COMMIT NOR DID COMMIT?

Seriously, the only evidence of a conspiracy, by the definition RP posted himself was if the two guys talking to Odio were complicate with LHO being willing and ready to shoot JFK. If he DIDNT SHOOT ANYBODY how could they conspire for a crime HE DIDNT COMMIT?

Please Rob, either admit your claim to evidence of a conspiracy is wrong, or your description of the conspiracy is wrong. You have two conflicting ideas, they don't match. Which is it?

My god, trying to get him to even see what I am talking about is like banging my head on a brick wall. It isn't just me is it? Other people can see that you claim your evidence of conspiracy is two people complicate WITH LHO in a crime, then claim it was nothing to do with LHO? Im pretty sure everybody else noticed that meant they couldnt have conspired with him... which means no evidence? Right? Please? Anybody?
Click to expand...

Just because 2 or more discuss assassinating a President and one of them is LHO or someone impersonating LHO, doesn't mean that LHO even fired a single shot.
 
Tomtomkent said:
Yes. But just because we have pictures of him holding the damn guns, that RP can't prove are fakes, evidence he purchased them, under a false ID, and yes, his prints on both rifle and pistol, we are supposed to assume "plant" with NO supporting evidence.

What is the best evidence LHO didn't own the guns? Is the Null hypothosis an alien concept here? Hmmm.

I bet it was somebody he didn't. And not actual evidence. I bet it is....
Click to expand...

Everything you have stated is false and you know it is false. You are fast becoming an amateur not worthy of a response.
 
EventHorizon said:
Things I've learned from this post:

1) Robert thinks that one piece of evidence is more important than all of the evidence combined.

2) Robert doesn't carefully read the posts he's responding to (I did not "choose to avoid" the fatal shot to the head, I mentioned it in my post).

3) Robert hasn't done any research on the type of person Oswald was.


Other things I've learned from this and other posts:

1) Robert is a master hand waver.

2) Robert is a hypocrite. Accusing others of ad hominem attacks that usually aren't ad hominem attacks and then using the same tactic himself.

3) Robert seems to project a lot. Calling others sophomoric while he himself is acting sophomoric is interesting. Asking for a single best piece of evidence is sophomoric. Saying you're evidence is "coming, stay tuned" is sophomoric.

4) Robert thinks that one inconsistency in a theory means that the entire theory is bogus. (Do I need to mention that this is a very sophomoric thing to do?)
Click to expand...

No. Robert knows that the evidence of a Lone Nut. is provably false. And each piece of evidence "proving" the contrary is a house of cards, that when each card it turned over and observed, is a joker, and when each joker is added up and taken together, it amounts to the biggest joke of all and the greatest hoax ever put over on the American People.
 
Last edited:
Robert Prey said:
No. Robert knows that the evidence of a Lone Nut. is provably false. And each piece of evidence "proving" the contrary is a house of cards, that when each card it turned over and observed, is a joker.
Click to expand...

Two of the cards you played did expose one joker. Show us the video again. LOL!
 
Last edited:
RoboTimbo said:
Read the WC Report. The null hypothesis is that Oswald bought the gun, used it to kill Tippitt and was caught with it in the theater because all of the evidence proves that. If you have some other hypothesis, you'll need to provide your single best piece of evidence. What do you have?



Yes, that's what is required of you. One piece of evidence for any of those. Afraid of shooting yourself in the foot again? LOL.


Well, no. :) It has already been proved that LHO killed Kennedy. Your single best piece of evidence that he didn't? So far, all you've had has confirmed what is already known, Oswald killed Kennedy.

Are you ever going to answer me about why the Zapruder film shows the right front of Kennedy's head blowing out? You posted some great evidence for that being an exit wound.
Click to expand...

Once again you continue to assert the consequence, assuming a fact you have not and cannot prove.
 
Robert Prey said:
Once again you continue to assert the consequence, assuming a fact you have not and cannot prove.
Click to expand...

If you meant affirming the consequent, no. You should read up on it.

Assuming the already proven fact isn't a fallacy. Do you have any evidence for any of your kooky ideas? You've been pretty consistent in shooting yourself in the foot.
 
Event Horizon wrote:


3) Robert hasn't done any research on the type of person Oswald was.

OH, really? And just what type of person was Mr.Oswald? Enlighten me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom