• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

October Stundie Finals

Vote for the best Stundie of October

  • 1) Please leave "reason" at home

    Votes: 33 24.8%
  • 2) LRO shadow size

    Votes: 9 6.8%
  • 3) Multiplication ain't what it used to be

    Votes: 7 5.3%
  • 4) List the reasons the impossible didn't happen?

    Votes: 9 6.8%
  • 5) No telescopes means a flat Earth

    Votes: 17 12.8%
  • 6) FEAR things that are dangerous

    Votes: 3 2.3%
  • 7) The sun is cold now

    Votes: 30 22.6%
  • 8) Nukes vs steel buildings

    Votes: 26 19.5%
  • 9) Star visibility enigma

    Votes: 7 5.3%
  • 10) Teens have all the money

    Votes: 8 6.0%
  • 11) Related to molten steel

    Votes: 15 11.3%
  • 12) Heat lacking foundries

    Votes: 8 6.0%
  • 13) Who knew reflectors reflect?

    Votes: 28 21.1%
  • 14) No longer carbon based

    Votes: 12 9.0%
  • 15) Ad Hominem if you dare

    Votes: 20 15.0%
  • 16) Disney Channel porn

    Votes: 17 12.8%
  • 17) Al Qaeda in Italy

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • 18) Propper bad news about the desise

    Votes: 6 4.5%
  • 19) Eclipses can only be seen from Earth

    Votes: 28 21.1%
  • 20) The whole universe started when I was born!

    Votes: 109 82.0%

  • Total voters
    133
  • Poll closed .

Travis

Misanthrope of the Mountains
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
24,133
We gather here today to honor the person (or computer program engaging in a very esoteric Turing test) that wrote this:

"The author is pointing to rules and procedure in a U.S. District court.
Same exists in the U.K.
Verbatim.
just written differently."
Magnificent! That, gathered throngs, is what this is all about. Mocking idiocy and unsound logic. Here is the virtual trophy.

1110746a2433fc6d0e.gif



1) Yeah, it is totally unfair to bring "reason" to a debate when one side is hoping to appeal to ignorance.
Enough with your Apollo is true by virtue of an appeal to reason jive line Jay.
****
2) And we're supposed to have reconnaissance satellites over Earth too but I never see their shadows on Google Earth.
I'm in the group that believes the longer the explanation required the more there is to hide.

That's what I see. Where's the shadow for the LRO?
****
3) Celsius always was the rebellious one.
So the loosely piled would indicate it would be similar to the WTC, making it easier for air to get through. 15 M is about 50 feet the pile at the WTC was 80ft. Let's see what else it says. "Pile surface temperature was recorded to be 130oF (54oC)" and "Maximum temperature exceeded 960oF (516oC) at the core of the hot spot, nearly four meters below the pile surface." That means the core is about 7.3 times hotter than the surface.
****
4) And, just for fun, why don't you tell me how we can really know the copper Statue of Liberty hasn't really been replaced with one made out of nano-midget circus performers?
Just for fun Hans try listing the rreasons why the columns on the impact side couldn't have been replaced with lighter, weaker sacsimsiles or the originals just weakened. I mean only the sections in the impact area.
****
5) I'm pretty sure that Eratosthenes did not actually look down the well in Swenet all the way from Alexandria. So why the need for telescopes?
Why the serpant in the bible, or tales of dragons in Celtic and Chinese cultures? The symbolism is all around us, and david icke just took the time to look at it. Just because we can’t visually see things, doesn’t mean that its there.
During the dark ages, europe thought the earth was flat while most of the ancient world
already knew that the earth was round, and that we revolved around the sun, along with magnificant detail of stars and planets with out the use of telescopes? Hmm, who could have given them this knowledge if they had no telescopes?
****
6) Next on their agenda: making people fear falling off tall buildings by duping them with tales of people being splattered.
And it all gets back to the theme of DD's blog & book - nearly everything you've been told about food and diet is a lie. The most common lies that are used to misdirect people into making choices favoring feed products over food produce are: Saturated fat are cholesterol raising and bad for your heart, that too much meat (especially red meat) will cause cancer, that plant based foods are healthiest, and that fiber is absolutely vital to having a healthy digestive system. As I quoted yesterday:

The State’s primary tactic in mind control is FEAR...

...FEAR of saturated fat. FEAR of red meat. FEAR of salt. FEAR of the sun. FEAR of not getting enough “fiber” in your diet.
****
7) It is indeed an interesting notion that the Sun sits there unable to heat up the rest of the solar system.
Its an interesting notion that things will radiate heat while isolated in a vacuum....

As the LM was standing in a vacuum it could not possibly radiate heat away, that would be building up from the sun, occupants, and electrical systems.
****
8) I'm just saying that we are wasting concrete when we should be building all the bomb shelters out of steel frames.
I'm just saying explosives had to of been used because an atomic bomb can't even bring down an entire steel framed building
****
9) Why guess about it? Just go ask a fourth grader.
Wonder why Ed and Buzz could see the stars there surrounding the craft and Neil and Mike couldn't? Guess star visibility is situational.
****
10) No wonder the recording industry is in bad shape. Their executives think all the real money is in the bank accounts of pimpled teens.
...plus, how is it that blu-ray discs and most dvd's nowadays have copyright protection coded in to prevent this, yet cd's have absolutely none? It's because the record labels stand to profit much much more by suing the pants off of idividuals instead of investing in technology to prevent it in the first place.
****
11) And how are these so called "laws of motion" related to putting things in orbit?
Someone please explain to ___ (Since he it too much of a truther to talk to me) the second law of thermodynamics, which says that a very hot object will transfer it's energy away from itself to a cooler object, than a mildly hot object will.

You can even give this link. It explains the SLoT quite simpily, which will be perfect for him.

http://www.ftexploring.com/energy/heatflow.htm
Explain how this is related to molten steel staying molten?
****
12) Is the heatless steel foundry powered by cold fusion? Does it even need power?
the current way we make steel is not about heat their are other components needed that create the grade of steel you take for granted
****
13) Yeah, who ever heard of a reflector reflecting light. That's crazy talk.
So what if i got my laser pointer keyring and fired it at a nearby bike reflector?
Do you predict there will be a beam reflected back in my direction
or
do you predict that there will simply be a red dot on the plastic surface of the reflector?
****
14) Can stupidity be denser in a silicon based life form?
I've evolved well beyond a basic carbon based life-form.
****
15) Well, I think someone took this as a dare.
None that I can discern. May I recommend the following article, which, as it's written by an Israeli, will be dismissed ad hominem by the troglodytes
Michael B. Oren is a Senior Fellow at The Shalem Center in Jerusalem, and a Contributing Editor of Azure and scumsucking liar.
****
16) I have no idea what this is on our cable bill dear. Whatever this Barely Legal Temptation #4 is I swear it was on the Disney Channel. That is if I knew anything about it.
I tried to turn on something on cable last night just to keep me company. When I tried to switch over from tranny cheerleader dog-eating serial killers, I couldn't find anything but SAW spinoffs and torture porn on the other channels. I tried switching it to the Disney channel but they had a bunny rabbit showing kids how to use a condom on there and pick the right booths at peep shows.
****
17) This is BBC World reporting on an impending US Navy Seal action in Italy.
if the US decide to protect a murderer on silly reasons, [....] as consequence I would be pleased if Italy hosts, let's say, some members of Al Qaida, as a retaliation, so that you feel the same kind of approach, and that would be "justice served" to me.
****
18) I'm pretty sure the "wicked stuff" are chemtrails. Everything else seems to be something about Denise using GNU Hurd Unix while engaging in the new party drug solfate that causes copper poisoning.
Just hurd on the news about a desise killing roots of trees in the uk, its propper bad news. There is an old trick of killing trees with copper nails. Is there some kind of solfate in that wicked stuff from copper? Is the desise story just a cover up.
****
19) Hmmm, so Neil was orbiting Earth's secret other Moon?
Neil Armstrong talks of witnessing a Solar eclipse flying to the Moon.
Which means the Moon was blocking out the Sun.
Which means the same eclipse would have been visible from Earth, because he was flying from the Earth to the Moon.
****
20) How can pictures of World War Two exist? I wasn't even born yet.
If it (light) takes 11 million years to travel to earth, how can i see it now? I'm only 20.

If it takes 11 million years to travel to earth then the viewer would need to be 11 million years old.
 
A fine crop, but can any of them compare with the pristine beauty that is number 20? I think not.
 
I'm going to think a while before voting, but I'd just like to draw attention to #10's masterly use of the word "idividuals", perhaps the perfect description of the lone conspiracy theorist.

Dave
 
I'm going to think a while before voting, but I'd just like to draw attention to #10's masterly use of the word "idividuals", perhaps the perfect description of the lone conspiracy theorist.

Dave

Wow I missed that one. Idividuals is BRILLIANT!
 
Yeah, I sort of figured #20 would be a runaway winner. That's why I put it last.
 
20 is just too sad to contemplate. I voted 15, 16 and 19.
 
The thing about 20 is, I can understand someone getting exactly that confused if they simply haven't got their head in the right place to understand the problem.

Anyway, for sheer arrogance coupled with an absence of self-awareness, I think 11 and 15 are pretty hard to match.

Dave
 
Of course 20, but I wanted to pick a couple others just so the results wouldn't look too one sided.
8 because there's so much wrong in that short statement.
15 because the post being responded to could be argued to be poisoning the well, up until the individual straight up confirms its accuracy with a complete lack of self awareness.
 
The thing about 20 is, I can understand someone getting exactly that confused if they simply haven't got their head in the right place to understand the problem.

Of course, but upon reading that thread it is clear that it was tirelessly explained to him how wrong he was, yet he stayed the course. A true believer.
 
Last edited:
I think we got a couple of "Stundie of the year" candidates on this month's ballot.
 
What's the record high for voting percentage from the winning quote before? Number 20 has to be in contention; it's at 74.58% at the time I'm posting this.
 

Back
Top Bottom