WB11, NY1, CBS, and chopper 4 NBC show an orb going behind the towers before it exploded. Dodge, weave and ask questions instead of dealing with reality...that's what you guys do.
Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers
- Thread starter Tinfoil Hater
- Start date
-
- Tags
- no planers
WB11, NY1, CBS, and chopper 4 NBC show an orb going behind the towers before it exploded. Dodge, weave and ask questions instead of dealing with reality...that's what you guys do.
The Platypus
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,883
I see blurry video of a plane. especially in the 2nd zoomed in frame, you can see even moreso that it is a plane.
OK. This theory is the most idiotic thing I've ever seen.
Congrats! DUMB ARAB HIJACKERS.
Unfortunately for you 7, this has all been done before, right here
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=175654&highlight=VIDEOS
Please present something new. As a matter of fact please, present something to the insurance companies who paid United and American Airlines, millions of dollars in claims. I am sure they would like to recover that money. Wait, you can't because I am pretty sure they are satisfied that the payouts for all four flights are correct and viable.
Sheesh, do better.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=175654&highlight=VIDEOS
Please present something new. As a matter of fact please, present something to the insurance companies who paid United and American Airlines, millions of dollars in claims. I am sure they would like to recover that money. Wait, you can't because I am pretty sure they are satisfied that the payouts for all four flights are correct and viable.
Sheesh, do better.
Again, you WILL NOT post the orb and call it plane because that would be a simple falsehood. You will also NOT post any challenge but just repeat the same nonsense over and over. Show me a fake plane and will post the orb.LOL
twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 12,374
How can it be a "dodge" to present concise and compelling evidence to support our position? There are HUNDREDS of videos and images of the planes. There are HUNDREDS of eye witness accounts of planes. There were plane parts found all around the area. What more do you need?
You are denying probably one of the most documented disasters in history because of some "orb". That's not what skeptics do. It's what crazy people do.
You see two videos, one of an orb and silly fake plane and will never call the orb a plane in any real world situation like a debate or putting your face on video to these lies.
The Platypus
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,883
No they show planes, you are dodging and weaving reality because you read conspiracy cult websites that told you to call it an orb.
Asking stupid pointless questions instead of dealing with reality is what you guys do and that's why you are laughed at and considered to be either out of your minds or terribly stupid or both.
twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 12,374
Now I'm saddened that you appear to be a simple troll. A shame it is. I was hoping you'd present evidence that the MASSIVE amount of evidence for planes was faked and planted, but it appears that all you do is simply repeat your position over and over again.
Oh well. Maybe next time. Have fun
Witnesses are debunked by video proof and there are 4 surviving clips with crazies calling a small object a plane. You are denying visual proof and won't challenge it with the fake evidence because you know it's fake.
No they show an orb and very fake plane and you are dodging and weaving reality because you have no defense that told you to call it a plane.
Asking stupid pointless questions instead of dealing with reality is what you guys do and that's why you are laughed at and considered to be either out of your minds or terribly stupid or both.
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
I'm just giving you some good advice here. You keep showing the real photos over and over again and confusing them with faked photos. If you want people to see the faked photos, show the faked photos. I'm not sure why you're having a hard time with this. It seems pretty straight forward to me.
The Platypus
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,883
You are aren't even good at this performance your putting on. You must be new at this.
You can relabel a plane as an orb all you like, loons long before you have been doing it for 10 years now, and it isn't changing reality one bit. Everyone can see who the liars are, that's why your cult and this "orb" nonsense hasn't gotten anywhere and will never go anywhere.
The Platypus
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,883
Your weak attempts at reverse psychology won't work.
I don't give one little **** about you. You are a simple board troll on a major disinfo forum. I knew you woudn't present a challenge or evidence of real planes because you know you can't prove it against the live footage and a MASSIVE amount of evidence for NO plane (for T2) that was faked and added in real time and 24 minutes later in WB11, but it appears that all you do is simply repeat your position over and over again, which is no position at all, except that you accept the official myth of planes and hijackers.
ElMondoHummus
0.25 short of being half-witted
After reading on, part of me has trouble believing that this guy is really serious; these "arguments" he's forwarded just don't seem to have any real heart behind them.
That said, just to go through the motions: Purported video anomalies - or in this truther's case, flawed interpretations of what's been recorded - don't overcome the mass of the existent evidence.
Anyway, *yawn*... Lemme know if this guy says anything original. This is all stuff spun from a combination of Ace Baker's and Jammonius's delusions, and as such, is stuff that doesn't really require all that much effort.
That said, just to go through the motions: Purported video anomalies - or in this truther's case, flawed interpretations of what's been recorded - don't overcome the mass of the existent evidence.
- Live witnesses to the tragedy: http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/whattheysaw:eyewitnessaccountsofthenycai. And as had been pointed out, the isolating of photojournalist David Handschuh's quotes from the requisite context is deliberate distortion.
- There is direct radar data on the jetliners: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/index.htm. Link is to the NTSB flight path studies, which are combinations of secondary radar data plus what was gleaned from the flight data recorders that were recovered. For further information, forum poster BCR has raw radar data, and has combed over it extensively.
- There are the calls from the doomed jets passengers: Link 1 (FOIA pdf of "calls and other data"), Link 2 (More FOIA PDFs), Link 3 (Moussaoui trial exhibits), Link 4 (A Flash presentation of the calls. Don't worry, it says "Flight 93", but it displays data for all of the flights).
- There is the recovered debris.
- There is the forensic identification of victims remains (as a side note, the book "Who They Were: Inside the World Trade Center DNA Story: The Unprecedented Effort to Identify the Missing" is a fascinating read. It's a little bit off topic here, I admit, given that it concentrates on the Towers victims and not the jetliners, but it's fascinating reading nonetheless).
- There is recovered debris from the jets: http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/aircraftpartsnyc911.
Anyway, *yawn*... Lemme know if this guy says anything original. This is all stuff spun from a combination of Ace Baker's and Jammonius's delusions, and as such, is stuff that doesn't really require all that much effort.
Your weak attempts at denying facts has never worked.
The Platypus
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,883
Things aren't 'facts' just because you say they are... Clearly you fell for that trick from people on the internet, but i don't...
The Platypus
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,883
I don't get it either, the guy shows pics that show a plane then says there's no plane...
You are aren't even good at this performance you're putting on. You must be new at this.
You can call an orb a plane all you like, loons long before you have been doing it for 10 years now, and it isn't changing reality one bit. Everyone can see who the liars are, that's why your cult and the planes nonsense hasn't gotten anywhere and will never go anywhere on the web. The truth cannot be challenged and will never be for your plain and simple fantasy.
Last edited: