This seems like a key issue as to figuring out whether Guede got a deal whether for being an informant or turning on RS/AK (as I suspect). A lot of articles seem to suggest dropping the sentence to 16 years wasn't all that unusual and Guede might get out in less than that for some reason.
I'm not Italian and I don't know what the norms are there. I would have thought people would have been really scared about letting a guy like this back on the street in less than 15 years. In this case a clear cut goal of the imprisonment had to be protecting society and 15 years sounds a lot shy of what I would have thought necessary to accomplish this. But maybe in Italy it's SOP to let heinous rapist murderers back on the street in this short of time?
It's not that unusual, however Guede will get out a little sooner as his 'mitigations' weren't contested. A 'life' sentence for this crime is 30 years, Guede got mitigations for 'not acting alone' and 'showing remorse' as he said he was sorry he didn't do more to save Meredith, which reduced it to 24 years, they were not appealed by the prosecution. As a consequence of choosing the 'fast track' option, which abbreviates the trial of the first instance and basically skips the second, he received a further 1/3 reduction to his sentence, bringing it down to 16 years. At some point Barbie Nadeau reports that when she was having lunch with Valter Biscotti he got a call and said he'd gotten a deal for Guede, my
guess is if that was accurate then it might have been for Guede's vague spontaneous statement in exchange for them not appealing the 'mitigations' or insisting on 'aggravations.' At any rate with 30 being reduced by 1/3rd he'd have ended up with only a 20 year sentence regardless.
Amanda and Raffaele also received mitigations for basically 'being good kids before this,' which were appealed by the prosecution, so in the appeal they faced a potential 30 year sentence with 9 months solitary for Amanda, and some also for Raffaele though I don't recall how much. (6 mos?) They also had charges piled on for 'staging' the crime scene, 'transporting' the knife, and Amanda an extra year for the Lumumba slander, bringing their sentences to 25 and 26 years total. This is generally the province of the victims' lawyer, to insist on additional 'aggravations' and contest 'mitigations' as the Italian sentencing system is generally lenient and this allows for a voice for maximum punishment, the money is often irrelevant as many murderers are basically indigent anyway. This is why sometimes prominent personages in the community will take up the 'civil part' for especially heinous crimes if the victim's family couldn't afford it.
Once they're in jail further reductions are possible if they stay out of trouble, as every few years a review board or somesuch looks at it and can reduce the sentence further. Thus were this a normal situation Rudy Guede might not have to serve the whole 16 year sentence. I wonder if that will apply in this case however, as that's usually tied (also) to the perpetrator admitting his guilt and being 'forgiven,' Italy in some ways is still a very Catholic country. So far he has just admitted to not doing enough to save Meredith when others that kinda looked like Raffaele and mighta sounded like Amanda actually did the foul deed. This is still the 'official story' of the prosecution, however I wonder just how fooled that 'review board' or whatever it was will be.
So even if he's 'good' he might not get those reductions, and it's possible his sentence could be increased due to that
calunnia charged asked for right before the verdict, though personally from an objective view I'd have to say that might not be fair either as the letter just refuted Alessi, didn't actually say anything specific about Amanda and Raffaele and ought not be considered actionable as they'd just been convicted of the crime anyway so it could be argued all he was doing was agreeing with the court decision but nothing more specific than what he already said. When he was in court he just
sat there and didn't even seem to acknowledge it the way I read it, though this was tough as it was another
very bad media day and they ran with 'Guede accuses Raffaele and Amanda' but that's not exactly what happened. I think the most likely scenario is someone either from the prosecution or his own lawyer's team wrote that up for him to discredit Alessi in the media (not that tough to do) and he signed it under their advisement after the first verdict and then they told him to stay as mute as he could in court to avoid further charges.
It's a complicated formula and this is the best understanding I have of it. Guede got a nice package, but not that much better than it would have been. What I find interesting is that this happened at the same time that the prosecution was pursuing the maximum possible penalty for Amanda (especially) and Raffaele. Broken_English at the IIP site said that had the Court validated the prosecution's appeal, Amanda would have received the most stringent sentence for a girl her age (under 25) since someone convicted in 1699! I wonder if he meant 1969, at any rate Mignini was going for a record.
ETA: I watched a little of the video Paninaro linked to above. I don't speak Italian so I didn't understand much except what I could gather from a tiny knowledge of Spanish. But I didn't hear RS mentioned once. What's with that?
Patrick has no beef with Raffaele, it's Amanda that 'ruined his life' and currently Italian justice concurs, it was she that caused him to sit in jail for two whole weeks. He hasn't shut up about it since the day he was released. My guess is the environment in Perugia probably reinforces that, perhaps even more so now as the Perugians probably don't want to face up to what they did and how they excused police exuberance and 'mistakes' and so cruelly condemned her in thought and deed. They might be thinking 'she has to have deserved
some of that right? Look at what she did to Patrick!' Thus Patrick gets a sympathetic audience to snivel to, and they have 'evidence' of her perfidious nature, so maybe she's a nasty bit of goods anyway, eh?