• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

What is a truther?

16.5 said:
Curious, you seem to have no problem characterizing people as a bandit without a shred of evidence, yet you expect us to take your word as the gospel truth.

Now, Red, I don't want to label you as a flaming hypocrite, but, you know:

l l l
l l l
l l l
v v v​
Click to expand...

To indulge your derail. I did not characterize "people." I'm very specific about who, in my opinion, acted irresponsibly, and possilby criminally.

The difference being that I don't lump people into homogeneous groups as you do when you sling around the prejorative, "truther.''
 
The difference being that I don't lump people into homogeneous groups as you do when you sling around the prejorative, "truther.''
Click to expand...

The "Pejorative" of truther is one of their own making. They coined the term and it's their own fault that they chose such an ironic name for themselves and made it such low hanging fruit.
 
I imagine the 200 or so have contacted the mother ship for advice on how rationalize their being here 24/7 to debate 3 people about 9/11.:p
 
Clayton Moore said:
That might be true if there weren't a couple hundred posters queued up here to castigate the two or three posters who speak in favor of the 9/11 truth movement.
Click to expand...

It's a skeptic's forum, not a "come here and recruit people into your 911 cult" forum... why are you expecting most people to not be skeptical of your nonsense?
 
RedIbis said:
To indulge your derail. I did not characterize "people." I'm very specific about who, in my opinion, acted irresponsibly, and possilby criminally.
Click to expand...

You are are you, :rolleyes:, :bs:

So then who specifically would those people be?
 
Last edited:
Clayton Moore said:
I imagine the 200 or so have contacted the mother ship for advice on how rationalize their being here 24/7 to debate 3 people about 9/11.:p
Click to expand...

I'm actually trying to rationalize why you kooks would come to a skeptics forum and then have tantrums and get all in childish huffy fits that everyone doesn't just believe everything you say and join your cult...

Noone came to you kooks, you came here, it's a skeptics forum, how much of a 'bag of duh' does one have to be to not expect opposition to crazy claims here?

Maybe you can explain that for me...
 
Last edited:
The Platypus said:
It's a skeptic's forum, not a "come here and recruit people into your 911 cult" forum... why are you expecting most people to not be skeptical of your nonsense?
Click to expand...

Pretty evasive response.

I'm sure I'm the actual skeptic not you and your cohorts.
 
Clayton Moore said:
Pretty evasive response.

I'm sure I'm the actual skeptic not you and your cohorts.
Click to expand...

Talking about evasive as well as arrogant, what a pathetic and telling response you give...

You aren't being a skeptic, you believe some crap you were told online, without being skeptical about it or where you got it from, and now here you are, roaming the internet, just like your 'cohorts', because you are trained to go out and promote the cult's beliefs, and then you are getting mad and acting like a spoiled child because, others are not believing in what you tell them too.

Again i ask, what do you expect, it's a skeptics forum, not a recruit for 911 cults here, forum... Don't you guys even notice there are many other topics on this forum other than yours, notice the common theme between them all. Gee, yet you come here and expect everyone not to be skeptical of anything you or your 'cohorts' say, like a child would expect...
 
Last edited:
Sam.I.Am said:
Wait? I have Cohorts? I didn't even know that I was a Hort.
Click to expand...

Well you know how it is, in their little delusion it's us that are the cult, not them, we are all "cohorts" plotting as a team against them at best and at worst we are all working for the, whoever the evil "they" of the week is.

In reality, i don't know one person on this forum, nor have i ever even had any kind of significant interaction with anyone here beyond a casual comment or two... I, like you, didn't even know I have 'cohorts' here... LOL
 
Last edited:
The Platypus said:
Well you know how it is, in their little delusion it's us that are the cult, not them, we are all "cohorts" plotting as a team against them at best and at worst we are all working for the, whoever the evil "they" of the week is.

In reality, i don't know one person on this forum, nor have i ever even had any kind of significant interaction with anyone here beyond a casual comment or two... I, like you, didn't even know I have 'cohorts' here... LOL
Click to expand...

I was kinda hoping you and I could someday become cohorts. But hey, whatever man...
 
RedIbis said:
To indulge your derail. I did not characterize "people." I'm very specific about who, in my opinion, acted irresponsibly, and possilby criminally.

The difference being that I don't lump people into homogeneous groups as you do when you sling around the prejorative, "truther.''
Click to expand...

KAY!

I'm not sure pointing out that you are a hypocrite is a derail, but I'm just gonna lump you into your own super special group!

Libeler.

Take care, Red! Tick tock!
 
Sam.I.Am said:
Wait? I have Cohorts? I didn't even know that I was a Hort.
Click to expand...

You could probably joke about getting thousands of Ameros from the illuminati and the most rabid one's would likely believe it. Look at Jones did when a member here played a practical joke about the tracking chips.

16.5 said:
Libeler
Click to expand...
Probably is a more accurate term than the truther label anyway... Libel involves making accusations without evidence or justification calculated to injure a person's reputation by exposing them to hatred, contempt or ridicule. Which "made off like a bandit," etc, etc, and all would fit in the category of.
 
Last edited:
Grizzly Bear said:
You could probably joke about getting thousands of Ameros from the illuminati and the most rabid one's would likely believe it. Look at Jones did when a member here played a practical joke about the tracking chips.
Click to expand...

Ixnay on the meroaay mmkay.
 
Sabretooth said:
I imagine a truther as:

- One who doesn't know how to think for themselves.
- One that will only accept items as "evidence" only if it discredits official explanations.
- One who automatically discredits evidence if they don't understand how it works.
- One who doesn't want to admit being wrong, despite glaring evidence to the contrary.


I may add some more...
Click to expand...

A government apologist:

-One who doesn't know how to think for themselves
-One who will only accept government lies like arabs flying planes when they couldn't fly a kite.
-One who won't look at the evidence and challenge that evidence that destroys government one-sided impossible reports.
-One who will never admit the government would ever do anything like kill a few thousand of its citizens so the NWO can really begin. Arab hijackers was a complete and utter, assinine joke that was never proven.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom