• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

UFOs: The Research, the Evidence

Status
Not open for further replies.
Krikkiter,

You still haven't provided any reason that suggests the object you saw was something extraordinary that defies conventional explanation.


Which puts it in exactly the same category as the world famous Lake Windemere Volksblimp™.


Therefore there is no evidence that you saw a UFO.


The only thing that prevents this from being a non sequitur is that you don't actually have a premise from which your conclusion can be disconnected.
 
So just to be clear, the thing krikkiter saw was not a ufo, despite being unidentified because folo thinks it sounds like something mundane. Pot and kettle in a non white situation? Folo the light you described sounds like a firefly. Ergo it was not a UFO. Yay!

And that works DESPITE the redefining of what counts as an unidentified flying object.
 
I can't believe that this thread is still up and running. Let me see if I can do a quick recap.

The research: A rather exhaustive (and expensive) series of studies by the Air Force 50 odd years ago which concluded that almost all unidentified flying objects were of mundane origin and found no evidence of extraterrestrial origin even in the ones still left unexplained.
Add to that a plethora of admittedly unscientific conjecture and speculation based more on preconcieved belief than logic or reason.

The evidence: Not a whit. Lots of evidence that people see things they can't explain, but not a shred that connects said observations to extraterrestrial visitation.

Did I miss anything?
 
I can't believe that this thread is still up and running. Let me see if I can do a quick recap.

The research: A rather exhaustive (and expensive) series of studies by the Air Force 50 odd years ago which concluded that almost all unidentified flying objects were of mundane origin and found no evidence of extraterrestrial origin even in the ones still left unexplained.
Add to that a plethora of admittedly unscientific conjecture and speculation based more on preconcieved belief than logic or reason.

The evidence: Not a whit. Lots of evidence that people see things they can't explain, but not a shred that connects said observations to extraterrestrial visitation.

Did I miss anything?

Nope.
 
You "skeptics" know nothing. Aliens are watching, studying us. They use deception- their crafts, masquerading as terrestrial airplanes are flying above our heads right now. Aliens and alien constructs disguised as humans are walking among us. Swarms of undetectable alien survey nanomachines watch us, recording and transmitting our movements, our acts and even our thoughts; some even hide inside us. Cloaked alien ships hover silently above us, silent everwatching sentinels- maybe guards.

Its true. I know it. They told me.
 
It's short for Davina.

Oh I get it, it's a woo quantum thingy, a giant talking quantum wabbit with big black almond shaped eyes. If you look at it's boy properties, you think you see a giant boy wabbit named Dave. If you look at it's girl properties, you think you see a giant girl wabbit named Davina.

(Not you, the generic you) ;)
 
I actually have some research to report, though it deals only with perceptions. A student here needed to create a survey questionnaire for a psychology class and then report back her findings after doing some statistical analysis. She decided to research paranormal beliefs, and in helping her put together the form, I suggested a couple of questions that might be of interest.

She surveyed 144 people in five different classes (all at the same time period--no overlaps); some subjects were teachers, but most of them were students, ranging in age from 18 to 62, with a median age of 25. Among other things, she asked if people believed various things really existed. More people believed in angels than did not--85 to 47, with the rest undecided. A smaller group, about half of the subjects, believed in demons--71 believed, 55 did not, the rest undecided.

Aliens visiting the earth from other planets? 6 believed, 129 did not believe, 9 were undecided.

She asked whether people defined "bigfoot" as
A. a gigantic ape-like creature that really lives in North America--18
B. a fictional or imaginary ape-like creature--120
C. a hoax--6
D. Other--0

At my behest, she also asked which of these is the best definition for "UFO":
A. Alien spaceship--1
B. Unidentified flying object--139
C. Something mistakenly believed to be a material craft--2
D. A spiritual light in the sky--1
E. Other--1

There were 25 questions in all, but I thought these were the most apposite. By the way, I do not necessarily agree with her wording, but I did help her set up the site so the Respondus program would mix the responses offered so they didn't always come in the same order.
 
Last edited:
@ Spektator:
clapping.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom