Saudi Ambassador attack...thwarted

Chaos said:
Another possibility would be that some junior guy in one of the factions organized this on his own, without adult supervision, in order to impress his superiors with his competence. Boy, did that ever backfire...
Click to expand...

If this were the case why would Obama, Clinton and other PR clowns be making such a fuss about it?

They have all the super secret inside info that they can't tell us about, remember.
 
Last edited:
JihadJane said:
If this were the case why would Obama, Clinton and other PR clowns be making such a fuss about it?

They have all the super secret inside info that they can't tell us about, remember.
Click to expand...

Because it was a potential international terrorist indecent on American soil. Things like that can have big consequences. The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand led to World War 1.
 
Virus said:
Because it was a potential international terrorist indecent on American soil. Things like that can have big consequences. The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand led to World War 1.
Click to expand...

It merely triggered the war. If it hadn´t been that, it would have been something else... maybe Wilhelm II getting an upset tummy from eating spoiled Russian caviar or something.
 
Chaos said:
There is an old Japanese proverb: "The best swordsman in the world does not fear the second-best swordsman; he fears the worst swordsman in the world, because there is no way for him to predict what that fool will do next."
Click to expand...

This quote was in a movie. I can't remember what movie it was, but I remember it had a female assassin who used a rubber nipple for a baby bottle as a silencer for her pistol.

/derail
 
JihadJane said:
If this were the case why would Obama, Clinton and other PR clowns be making such a fuss about it?

They have all the super secret inside info that they can't tell us about, remember.
Click to expand...

Shaking up the Iranian administration to see what falls loose.

I don't know.
 
Chaos said:
There is an old Japanese proverb: "The best swordsman in the world does not fear the second-best swordsman; he fears the worst swordsman in the world, because there is no way for him to predict what that fool will do next."
Click to expand...

So, what the Japanese are saying is, all that time and effort they put into swordsmanship turned out to be a total bust. Better to be completely untrained and unschooled.

Chaos said:
So if you´re trying to outsmart smarties likes the CT crowd, you´ve got to be as dumb as you possibly can."
Click to expand...

I am being as dumb as I possibly can. But the CT's don't seem to be learning anything. They keep doing the same crap over and over.

Chaos said:
I think they´re stupid enough; they´re just not doing it on a big enough scale.
Click to expand...

Well, yeah. Small and stupid gets you ground underfoot like a bug. Big and stupid gets you Asia.

OTOH, let us not forget what small, stupid Sparta did to the Persians at Thermopylae when the Persians were big and stupid.

Basically, the world domination game is a crap shoot. Just ask Alice. When she's ten feet tall.

And the Iranians are already losing, and they've barely even started. Which torques Childlike Empress' jaws something awful. I can hear her teeth grinding from here.
 
Last edited:
WildCat said:
The Persians won that battle. ;)
Click to expand...

Depends on how you define "won". The way I see it, Sparta won, 20,000 to 300. After that Persian "victory", the Greeks joined forces and went on the offensive against the Persian empire.
 
Toontown said:
Depends on how you define "won". The way I see it, Sparta won, 20,000 to 300. After that Persian "victory", the Greeks joined forces and went on the offensive against the Persian empire.
Click to expand...
First of all, Spartans weren't even the majority of the Greeks at Thermopylae. The Greeks left behind numbered 300 Spartans, 700 Thespians and 400 Thebans. They were a mere speed bump for the Persians, and while the Battle of Thermopylae can be held up as a story of fighting on despite enormous odds it was militarily insignificant.
 
Virus said:
Because it was a potential international terrorist indecent on American soil. Things like that can have big consequences. The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand led to World War 1.
Click to expand...

Or Castro's assasination of JFK
 
Virus said:
Yeah but Ray McGovern thinks the government is controlled by Jews.
Click to expand...


Nope. He knows, like everybody who pays attention, that the right-wing israeli lobby has a huge influence on the political process in the US, and takes this into consideration in his analysis. Equating said lobby with "jews" is a tactic that has worn out in recent years, and you repeating it over and over again doesn't help your crusader cause, "i'm afraid".
 
Childlike Empress said:
Nope. He knows, like everybody who pays attention, that the right-wing israeli lobby has a huge influence on the political process in the US, and takes this into consideration in his analysis. Equating said lobby with "jews" is a tactic that has worn out in recent years, and you repeating it over and over again doesn't help your crusader cause, "i'm afraid".
Click to expand...

It's worse than that. The more this desperate tactic is deployed the more it makes the deployers look like racists themselves.

By continually crying wolf they also undermine genuine efforts to combat racism.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Ahmadinejad likens claims of Iranian assassination plot to Iraq WMD
 
Last edited:
OK, so he thinks a certain group of people control the US government, who happen to be Jews. He's a Truther and regular guest on Alex Jones' PrisonPlanet.

Yeah, credibility = tons.
 
Virus said:
OK, so he thinks a certain group of people control the US government, who happen to be Jews. He's a Truther and regular guest on Alex Jones' PrisonPlanet.

Yeah, credibility = tons.
Click to expand...

I agree- but remember who we're dealing with here. To them the above represents "credibility" in it's purest form.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Nope. He knows, like everybody who pays attention, that the right-wing israeli lobby has a huge influence on the political process in the US, and takes this into consideration in his analysis. Equating said lobby with "jews" is a tactic that has worn out in recent years, and you repeating it over and over again doesn't help your crusader cause, "i'm afraid".
Click to expand...

Why call the Israel Lobby right-wing? If there was a Labor government in power the Lobby would be just as supportive as it is now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom