What proof is there that Amanda lied?
Starting from the conviction for calunnia going down. There is enough to fill several pages to show and describe the incredible number of proven lies.
When was it established that Raffaele did not have blood on his hands that night from the fish?
Are you normal Kaosium? Even if Raffaele had fish blood on his hands, would a normal person write about this in a paper that she gives to the police to provide them evidence on a murder investigation? The false accusation consists in the act of writing it down into a communication note meant to be an element in a murder investigation. Tht was written in an doubtful "open" form, so designed to be read as possible human blood, casting suspicion on Raffaele. The lie consists in the doubt and in the suspicion-creating function of it.
I've seen others, notably Pilot and Djfred, imply this is some sort of damning admission too and never understood what they meant. How are you interpreting that to the detriment of Amanda?
I will never trust a person who says thinks about "the best truth". This is one more self-discrediting statement among the many.
What makes you think she's lying about being very clean? Has it ever been established that Amanda is not generally a clean person?
Again, it seems you are going around old and tiresome tricks, I find this reasoning dishonest.
Amanda was
accused by Meredith of not being clean in their common envionment. Meredith's opinion and her complaints were
reported by her friends and the roommates, who are all
credible witnesses.
What Meredith complained about is the first thing that matters, rather than how clean Knox actually was.
It was reported that Meredith complained with her of having left blood stained tampons in their common bathroom, and for having left the toliet dirty (as well as for not respecting the house cleaning shifts, and for leaving objects in their common bathroom which Meredith disliked, and other reasons).
Moreover Knox herself admitted of having left the toiled dirty with feces; and also blood drop of Amanda was actually found in the bathroom and the defence had long claimed that it was mentrual blood.
Aka: the lie consists in throwing back on Meredith the same blaming which, in fact, was the accusation Meredith made against her.
Was that an insinuation or was it just Amanda wondering about where that blood came from if she knew it wasn't her? Would leaving a little blood in the bathroom when there's suggestions that someone might have left quickly suggest that person was normally not very clean,
Time wasting questions: we know for certain Amanda was actually perceived by Meredith as being not very clean.
Amanda new Meredith had this opinion about her.
Amanda also already knew whether she herself had bleeded or not; because everybody knows if they happened to have a blood loss the day before.
and if Amanda said it that way wouldn't it imply to you that she wasn't saying there was anything unclean about leaving blood in the bathroom but that with blood in the bathroom and the door open that meant someone might have gotten hurt and left the cottage quickly?
This adds further blame on Amanda.
She manages however to imply that the blood is probably menstrual blood left by Meredith. She says "we are very clean", then sets an exception "but probably Meredith had menstrual issues"; aka: we are both clean,
but I am the cleanest, probably
the other one made the mess. This is a way to say the other is the dirty one, which is exactly what Meredith had tiold her.
She takes a revenge, retributes Merediths by calling her dirty, just the way Meredith had called her dirty before.
That there is a quasi-political undertone to the piece is to me stunning, I thought there would be a period of silence, but I suppose that was as stupid as it was wishful:
