I agree with that. Since they are legally innocent (and probably factually, but I'm not willing to commit that far on a matter I only know tangibly..), I am glad to see they're free of jail, and hopefully (if they have any logical sense!) out of Italy. Extradition is a bit of a pain after all, since the prosecutor has a bee in his bonnet..
It might be impossible to extradite them from the United States due to the 'probable cause' clause. They might even have trouble getting a EAW served in some countries, the UK for instance has refused Italian EAWs
before. The Italian Justice System kinda has
a...
reputation in certain quarters.
.... And now you go off the rails. No, they don't. (Hell, a few even said the court had found them innocent and accepted it.). Also, beyond vile? Emotionally charged langauge for the win, and I believe there's something about becoming your enemy in that too.
You know, the member of this forum who found herself smeared throughout the ether, who was stalked from site to site, whose husband lost her job, and who has had three attempts to lure her children out with 'crank' calls would tend to disagree with your assessment, when she gets back from Perugia perhaps she'll tell her yourself.
Kevin they tracked down where they thought he worked, disseminated it throughout the ether, took the picture they thought was his and put it on an old avatar of his that said something like 'The Face of Evil, Kevin's Thrill Kill Kult.' They did this repeatedly over the course of months, not a one day ordeal.
So, no. Gloating just makes you like them. (Although, after reading some of the comments there, I just kinda blankly stared at them. Amanda bought her way out? Will commit again? Travesty like Casey Anthony, which was only a huge deal because of the media? Seriously guys?)
There's also a comedy element.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
Platitudes will get you anywhere.
Actually, I'm curious as to what you were referring to in the first place. The forum basically went down for an hour or so around the time of the verdict (sorry!) thus there wasn't much chance to do much 'gloating.' Actually today they were awfully muted as well. At any rate it's not like there was any blow up today, thus your admonition strikes me as curious. I recall about twenty pages of posts, one person new to the thread got a yellow card and an edit so fast I never saw what they were naughty for despite frequent updating, otherwise there was a lot of posting without incident. Were you expecting a stronger reaction in this thread or did just the volume of posts draw your attention?
However, isn't there something of a false equivalency between torturing a squirrel and being happy the squirrel got away from the torturer? Isn't there a distinction to be drawn between being happy that two innocents go free and those who condemned them prematurely distraught, and actively working to see that two innocent people spend up to thirty years in a steel box?
There's a way to determine with facts that reasonable doubt exists in this case. Hell, one can approach the threshold of them being
innocent beyond a reasonable doubt. The Hellmann Court itself didn't limit itself to merely establishing that reasonable doubt existed, it went for the exoneration code of paragraph one, section 530.
That factor weighs in on the discussion. It really makes people wonder.
Look, if PMF disgusts you, don't look. That bloody simple.
That's actually excellent advice, however the ire generated that you responded to was actually mostly towards media and peripheral players in the case.