I didn't make a mistake.
No, you made several.
Your entire
modus operandi for the past few months in which you've been debating this topic has been to pretend to be an expert, get caught, and run away to come back later under a new assumed identity hoping your trail of incompetence doesn't catch up to you.
Show my work to any professional cartographer and they'll tell you...
...that first you'll need to reconcile coordinate systems among the several in use.
It is so obvious...
Yet no one has managed to catch it in decades, except for the guy who has been shown to make basic map-reading errors.
The need here to do this must be quite deep.
Oh, but listen to you crow. Let's examine where the real needs probably lie.
First you show up to BAUT pretending to be a doctor. You say it was unacceptable for Frank Borman's gastrointestinal difficulties to be allowed to persist, and that if it were a real mission it would have been immediately aborted. Of course that argument was based solely on your say-so as an alleged medical professional. When others tore holes in that claim, you deployed a sock puppet -- supposedly another doctor -- to endorse the arbitrary opinion on which the whole claim rested. Your sock puppet was discovered and you were banned.
Then almost immediately after you arrive at ApolloHoax pretending to be some expert in celestial navigation. But naturally you made dozens of technical and conceptual errors, and I and others provided a very detailed, very in-depth description of how ascent guidance worked and how your claims simply made no sense. Then you destructed there in hail of sock-puppets and the now-familiar walls of text.
So back to BAUT where you claimed to be an expert in radar programming, but couldn't answer any basic questions about radar. You immediately tore into Wernher von Braun for being a horrible man who helped the Nazis commit genocide, and then into NASA for hiring such a horrible man. Then lo and behold you got caught again as a sock puppet and banned.
Now here, making the same claims under a brand new identity, but with fewer safeguards against uncivil debate.
Who in this discussion is really the one so desperate to prove his belief that he'll stoop to all manner of evasion and dishonesty to prevent a challenge?
Diagnosis; Limited intellectual range and contaminated calculative faculties.
That would almost work if my first post here hadn't been a fairly expert analysis of the computer difficulties encountered on Apollo 11, and if many of the kind readers and posters here don't know me from other forums such as BAUT and ApolloHoax.
Let's revisit part of that ApolloHoax debate again. You claimed a number of things, and when you were pressed to answer my question you evaded until you were threatened with banning, whereupon you
admitted that you had no credible evidence the Moon landings were fake, and you conceded that it happened substantially as NASA claimed.
But of course that was just a tactical withdrawal to keep you from having to answer questions you knew you couldn't answer. So please by all means explain to the nice readers here how you can accuse me of intellectual incapacity when your own admission of incapacity is right there in black and white.
Punishment; Quarantine. Go to the library and study for the next several years. Don't come out until you can read a map.
Part of my work has been in orbital geographical imaging systems. I help draw maps, buddy. And I've spent many, many years in libraries and have obtained a fairly extensive college education, probably spanning more years than you've been alive.
You're making elementary mistakes and hoping that people won't catch you in them. Bluster will not save you.
