Travis
Misanthrope of the Mountains
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
- Messages
- 24,133
To him, there is no difference.
In which case he is conceding that the far right is all white.
To him, there is no difference.
In which case he is conceding that the far right is all white.
If a white Republican wins the Whitehouse, there is bound to be claims of racism and a rigged election.
And the Left may well incite riots the burning of cities.
Now, even Morgan Freeman claims the "Tea Party" is racist (with zero evidence).
And Janeane Garofalo is convinced the only reason Herman Cain is a candidate is because he's been paid off so that the Tea Party doesn't look racist. The best answer to Lefty reverse racism is to nominate and elect Herman Cain. A Cain/Rubio ticket would compromise Obama's principle demographic support -- Blacks and Hispanics. And besides, Cain is, after all, a pretty smart fellow.
Maybe he is, maybe he isn't, but he believes some really stupid things. Namely:And besides, Cain is, after all, a pretty smart fellow.
~~~~
Given the choice between two black candidates, most black people I know show a preferrence for the one who looks the brightest and most rational.
~~~
And just because it hasn't been addressed yet:
Maybe he is, maybe he isn't, but he believes some really stupid things. Namely:
Yeah, no thanks.
- He is against legalizing same-sex marriage.
So is Obama
- He believes Muslims are trying to implement sharia law in the United States.
It's a fact.
- He believes that anthropogenic global warming is a hoax.
NOTE: Comments in italics added by Robert Prey
The idea that anyone really knows is definitely a hoax.

"He believes Muslims are trying to implement sharia law in the United States."
It's a fact.
so no one knows what herman cain stands for?![]()
no, it is not.
The idea that anyone really knows is definitely a hoax.
If by "really knows" you mean "knows with 100% certainty", then you are correct. However, the fact remains that there is scientific evidence and consensus on the issue and the odds, at this point, of it being incorrect are very, very low.
Anyone telling you that scientists are lying are the ones who are, in fact, lying.
Oh, that researchers have lied on this subject is a fact.
no, it is not.
"Evidence?" etc. and so on.
Yes it is. "Sharia Law will come to America." -- Muslim Cleric
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddA_VjIwzn4&feature=related
Re: Global Warming Research Fraud
The revelations that scientists at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (CRU) doctored the data supporting the global warming claims of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) means that EVERYTHING attributed to or based upon “global warming” is invalid. -- Canada Free Press
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17187
And: Weather Channel Founder John Coleman:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfHW7KR33IQ
Yes it is. "Sharia Law will come to America." -- Muslim Cleric
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddA_VjIwzn4&feature=related
Re: Global Warming Research Fraud
. . . {snip} Canada Free Press
Re: Global Warming Research Fraud
The revelations that scientists at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (CRU) doctored the data supporting the global warming claims of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) means that EVERYTHING attributed to or based upon “global warming” is invalid. -- Canada Free Press
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17187
And: Weather Channel Founder John Coleman:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfHW7KR33IQ
And this. An article from 2009. Two. Thousand. And. Nine. On climategate, no less. That's never been discussed or refuted on this board, ever. No sir.
That's your source?
LOL
I bet you still think that Obama was born in Kenya.
So, Cain is either ignorant or pandering to the ignorant. Either way, not really complementary.Six committees investigated the allegations and published reports, finding no evidence of fraud or scientific misconduct. The Muir Russell report stated, however, "We do find that there has been a consistent pattern of failing to display the proper degree of openness, both on the part of CRU scientists and on the part of the UEA." The scientific consensus that global warming is occurring as a result of human activity remained unchanged at the end of the investigations.