• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Continuation Part 3 - Discussion of the Amanda Knox case

Status
Not open for further replies.
the return of the strange man theory

BBCDanielS Daniel Sandford
Lumumba lawyer says #amandaknox drank beer and smoked cannabis. Press benches agree she is therefore guilty of being a student.

LOL :)
Back to Reefer Madness! I have a new avatar to tie in with today's theme!
bri1,

My avatar also comes from Reefer Madness. Meredith did think one person Amanda invited to the flat was strange (Juve?), but he and Amanda were just friends. Pacelli's rant is so typical of the nonsense that has permeated the case.
 
All the tweeters hate Pacelli.

That's good... though it's cruel to force Knox to sit through the abuse.

Does this go on in other trials? I don't think so. Usually prosecutors have actual evidence to summarize.

It depends on how the judge/jury sees it. My opinion is that it will show the court what type of argument has been used against her in the first trial and how worthless that argument is.
 
so many falsehoods, so little time

Does anyone have a link to the lies told by Prosecution and Police and leaked to the press?
I wrote up a list with links to earlier comments here some months ago. Charlie Wilkes wrote one that appeared between 2 and 4 November of last year here.
 
Pacelli: Why didn't #amandaknox say this is a lie, that Patrick was innocent. "The liar Amanda" didn't say anything to correct accusation.

Can't they see what a crazy double-bind this is? The only way Knox could have known anyone was innocent is if she'd been there.




1 minute agovia TweetDeck
 
Good thing rudy is not in court today. Love the Russian thing.


BBCDanielS Daniel Sandford
Apropos of not much Sollecito lawyer in #amandaknox trial has an enormous ring with many many diamonds. Looks real too. Has left it on desk
21 minutes ago
»

BBCDanielS Daniel Sandford
@adebradley Perugia, Tripoli, Sapporo all well-known Russian cities
26 minutes ago
»

BBCDanielS Daniel Sandford
@
@WalkerSkyNews get yourself to Perugia. Everyone else from Moscow is here
33 minutes ago
 
bri1,

My avatar also comes from Reefer Madness. Meredith did think one person Amanda invited to the flat was strange (Juve?), but he and Amanda were just friends. Pacelli's rant is so typical of the nonsense that has permeated the case.

Halides- I noticed. It's unvelievable the emphasis placed on this when everyone, including the older, professional (rather than student) housemates, and Meredith also smoked. What's extra weird, is that my experience of Italy (and particularly Perugia) is that it's fairly easy to get hold of hash, but not that easy to get hold of weed (skunk). Hash is usually quite weak in comparison.

I hope Rose is right, that these arguments will give the judges and lay judges a good idea about what rubbish formed the basis for the charge and conviction.
 
Sandford is right, that jacket with that shirt and jeans was a terrible mistake (I prefer him in the salmon pink, myself).

Ditto, need to let Bruce know the BBC guy is on target here.

NJusticePerugia Injustice in Perugia
@
@BBCDanielS Hey, fashion reporting has been Barbie & Andrea's role for 4 yrs. Leave them something. They've reported everything else wrong.
 
All three of them impressed by this one:
andreavogt Andrea Vogt
Pacelli calls #amandaknox a witch
BBCDanielS Daniel Sandford
Oooh. Name calling really cooking now. #amandaknox is a "witch of deception - "strega" was the word Lumumba lawyer used

BBCDanielS Daniel Sandford
For the Italian-lovers among you the full phrase was "strega dill inganno" #amandaknox.

BBCDanielS Daniel Sandford
Now Lumumba lawyer is pointing at #amandaknox and calling her a liar
BLNadeau Barbie Latza Nadeau
Pacelli: #amandaknox is a strega! Ouch!
Kaosium's right, it's like a scene from the Crucible!
 
Last edited:
I've got a feeling the hours of irrelevant and incoherent bull crap are going to backfire on the prosecution. First Mignini and now Pacelli is pulling his Fidel Castro length speech, and still no credible reconstruction of the crime, no motive, no timeline. Instead we hear nonsense about vibrators, condoms and cartwheels (again!). I suspect when Maresca gets up we'll going to learn how truthful, innocent and sincere the poor boy Rudy is.

This is really going nowhere. It's enough for the defence to present the simple facts about Guede and the real reconstruction of the crime.
 
BBCDanielS Daniel Sandford
Oooh. Name calling really cooking now. #amandaknox is a "witch of deception - "strega" was the word Lumumba lawyer used.

Literally a witch hunt. In 2011.
 
Aha! A witch!

I don't think it's going to work. Is the jury willing to take part in a witch trial and play along?

Poor prosecution, give them enough rope...
 
Lumumba certainly has got his revenge. He has no idea what kind of person Knox is or if she's guilty of murder. But he's arguing this in court anyway, through his lawyer.

He also knows that Amanda Knox probably told the truth about how the police were treating here in interrogation, but he keeps quiet about this anyway, blaming her and supporting the police instead.

What Knox did to him was no good, even if she was under pressure but this brutal character assassination makes Lumumba even worse and not telling the truth about the Perugia police makes him a liar, for whatever sad reason he has chosen to support the police and attacking a fellow victim of their questionable methods.

Could the defence called Lumumba to the witness stand to give evidence about the working methods at La questura? Then I think they should have done so.
 
Last edited:
NJusticePerugia Injustice in Perugia
@newsfromitaly Amanda Knox: Evidence Uncollected by Forensic Police groundreport.com/World/Amanda-K…
25 minutes ago
in reply to ↑
News from Italy
@newsfromitaly News from Italy
@NJusticePerugia If #AmandaKnox did not kill Meredith who did? Someone did.


People talk of Meredith being forgotten in this process, but Rudy is usually confined to a footnote in articles about Amanda. He usually only gets a 'Drifter Rudy Guede was also convicted of the crime', right at the bottom of the article.
I guess 'News from Italy' don't bother reading to the bottom of the article.
 
Lumumba certainly has got his revenge. He has no idea what kind of person Knox is or if she's guilty of murder. But he's arguing this in court anyway, through his lawyer.

He also knows that Amanda Knox probably told the truth about how the police were treating here in interrogation, but he keeps quiet about this anyway, blaming her and supporting the police instead.

What Knox did to him was no good, even if she was under pressure but this brutal character assassination makes Lumumba even worse and not telling the truth about the Perugia police makes him a liar, for whatever sad reason he has chosen to support the police and attacking a fellow victim of their questionable methods.

Could the defence called Lumumba to the witness stand to give evidence about the working methods at La questura? Then I think they should have done so.

Agree. This trial is full of exploitive characters.

Knox is quirky (and I do think she has Aspergers), but she has more integrity than the all three prosecution teams and the police force summed together.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom