Jay Jay Jay as in Juliet!!!
What I would like to do now is create a schematic depicting Apollo 11 Mission Report Landing Site Coordinate data, and then go on to demonstrate how different these report results, this representation of Apollo events is from the H. David Reed account of events. In so doing, I will also be able to demonstrate great internal incoherence with regard to the presentation of landing site coordinate data and the landing's circumstances as provided within the body of the Apollo 11 Mission Report itself. This is yet another powerful way of demonstrating trajectory data/telemetry fraud, and thereby demonstrate all of the Apollo 11 Mission to be inauthentic.
Let's take a look at what has now become everyone's favorite map.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/LAM2_CMP-flown.jpg
Each small square measures roughly 1.96 X 1.96 minutes of arc. Assuming the LRRR/Tranquility Base to be located at J .65/7.54 as we have done previously, then it can be shown the small square which contains that "best guess" which in the "real-time" world of the Apollo 11 Mission was J .5/7.7 , is bounded by 4 coordinates as below(North is top, South bottom, West to the left and East to the right);
The real-time best guess(BG) of J .5/ 7.7, the coordinates said to have been delivered to Collins just before the simulated lift off are as depicted in this schematic above, roughly half way to the J7-8 square's east from its dead center. Tranquility Base/LRRR would be just to the north west of BG as qualitatively represented above (TB).
And look now at this; the landing coordinates as determined by the powered flight processor/MSFN as they appear in the Apollo 11 Mission Report are 0.631 N and 23.47 E. We correct for the trajectory to map consideration and get 0.671 N and 23.40 E. Writing this in radians we get 00 40 17 north, and going through the same process for the east coordinate we get, 23 24 00 east. So the MSFN/Powered flight solution, a real-time Eagle landing coordinate solution, is in the very adjacent square(J6-7), the one just west of the square containing Tranquility Base. I have placed (PFP) in roughly what would be its location to the west of the Tranquility square. Only 0.64 miles or roughly 3380 feet separate (PFP) and (TB), the Powered Flight Processor and the LRRR at Tranquility Base.
The Apollo Guidance Computer's on board vector gave a real-time solution of 0.689 N and 23.39 E after correcting for trajectory to map considerations. This translates to 00 41 20 north and 23 23 24 east. I'll label that PNGS and place a representation of that coordinate solution in my schematic as well. The PNGS solution was/is a real-time solution and is only 0.75 miles distant from Tranquility Base. The PNGS and Powered flight solutions are only about 4 tenths of a mile or 2112 feet apart from one another.
Finally we have the Apollo 11 Mission Report's values for the real-time determination of the Abort Guidance System (AGS). Those numbers in the Mission Report are given as 0.639 N and 23.44 E. One corrects for trajectory to map considerations and converts to radians to get; 00 40 44 north and 23 22 12 east. So the AGS solution is the furthest away from Tranquility Base, but still very close at 1.13 miles to the southwest distant from Tranquility Base. And the PNGS and AGS solutions are only 0.423 miles distant or roughly 2233 feet from one another.
In celebration of my detractors' unflagging disgust and disgruntlement, I'd love to present my favorite H. David Reed quotations again, and so I shall !!!!!!!! Remember, according to Flight Director Glynn Lunney, Reed is the LEAD FIDO and was Mission Control's hand picked golden boy, the man who provided the Eagle's launch solution from the disoriented bird's simulated perch there at Tranquility Base Orlando. Here's my buddy Reed;
"After Apollo XI landed, as the World celebrated and sipped champagne, I slept in preparation for my shift prior to lunar launch. I would work with SELECT and DYNAMICS to get all the relative geometry down and work out the correct ignition time for return to the CSM.Piece of cake really. All we needed were landing site coordinates and a solid ephemeris on the CSM. I sat down at the console for that prelaunch shift and was debriefed by the previous team to complete hand-off. I probably had my second cup of coffee by then and got on the loop to SELECT to get the best landing site. I remember asking SELECT what he had for landing site coordinates. I’ll never forget his answer when he said, “take your pick FIDO!” I also remember not reacting too positively to his offer. He explained that we had five different sites. He said “we have MSFN(tracking radars), PNGS (primary LM guidance computer), AGS(backup LM guidance computer), the targeted landing site and, oh yes, the geologist have determined yet another site based upon the crew’s description of the landscape and correlating that with orbiter photos”. No two of these were even close to each other. It was the DYNAMICS computer controller, Pete Williams who catalyzed the solution. He said that if we only had rendezvous radar tracking data from the LM on the CSM we could work the problem backward. After all, we knew where the CSM was and the problem was a relative one between the CSM and the LM, not actually requiring latitude and longitude. To do this we would need to have the rendezvous radar (RR) turned on in the LM one revolution earlier than planned. Only two more passes of the CSM remained before Ascent ignition, before we had to have a solution to this problem! I remember taking my headset off and walking up to the Flight Director, Milt Windler to explain the situation. We only used that kind of face to face communication when we had a serious problem such as this. I detailed the problem as best we knew it and the process that we’d have to follow to get the data we needed, and why we had to start a rev early to finish the calculations and then find the critical lift-off time for lunar launch. I recall the CapCom instructing Buzz Aldrin that we needed him to perform the RR check early but I don’t believe that CapCom explained why, just another check was all. Shaft & trunnion angles were passed up to aid acquisition. Right on time as the CSM cleared the horizon we began seeing data. We counted the agonizing minutes as the telemetry came flowing in until the CSM was receding. Now we had the data we needed to run the problem (a rendezvous problem in reverse) and get the correct liftoff time*. And that’s what we used. Later we would find out just where were we on the surface. We were actually over 25,000 feet from the nearest of the other five choices we had! At 5,000-fps orbital velocity of the CSM that could have been up to a ten second error in liftoff. That would have meant we’d need a LOT of RCS (reaction control system fuel) to play catch up or slow down in a rather abnormal (I don’t recall train- ing for this one) rendezvous situation. I was assigned the descent phase for Apollo XII and I wasn’t about to go through that again."
Maurice Kennedy; Charles Deiterich III; William Stoval; William Boone III; Glynn S. Lunney; H. David Reed; Jerry C. Bostick (2011-05-13). From The Trench of Mission Control to the Craters of The Moon (ebook Locations 5634-5675).
Let's dig in and point out the contradictions. Reed says the powered flight solution, PNGS, AGS, maps and targeted site coordinates were not even close to one another. But those publishing the Apollo 11 Mission Report, would very much like us to believe differently. The PNGS and AGS solutions, as they appear in the Apollo 11 Mission Report, are a paltry 4 tenths of a mile distant, give or take. That's only a couple thousand feet and change. Like wise with the PNGS and powered flight solution values given in table 5-IV of the Apollo 11 Mission Report, 4 tenths of a mile apart more or less, that's it. They are practically right on top of one another. Everything is close, PNGS solution, AGS solution , powered flight solution, all very close to Tranquility Base. By the way, I am saving the map/photos and AOT solution discussions for later posts. And you guys thought the Great Wall of China was Long?! Back to business. The AGS solution is the furthest away at 1.13 miles and that's close enough, were they to have given those coordinates to the Lick Observatory Staff for the scientists there to have been able to successfully target the laser. If they aimed at the AGS solution coordinates, some of the light may have hit the LRRR 1.13 miles away assuming a beam width of 2 miles. If they aimed at the Powered flight solution, they would have hit the LRRR even with a ruby red laser beam only a mile across.
So Reed says the real-time solutions that were presented to him were way off from one another. The people writing the Mission Report would like to deceive us and have us believe David Reed saw entirely different numbers. David Reed says that once he solved for the LM/CSM relation and provided to the appropriate personal his launch solution, he realized the PNGS, AGS, Powered flight/MSFN and map/photographic solutions that had been available to him when he arrived at work were all at least 4 and a half miles distant from what proved to be Tranquility Base's coordinates/the LRRR coordinates(00 41 15 north , 23 26 00 east). AND! as mentioned, these various solutions, so distant from Tranquility Base, so distant from Reed's improvised rendezvous radar radar solution, a radar improvised solution only 1200 feet from Tranquility Base by my reckoning, were not in any way close to one another.
Reed says that all the real-time options available to him when he walked into work on the morning of 07/21/1969 were out of agreement with one another, and additionally, were far from Tranquility Base, no closer to the LRRR than 4 and a half miles. The Mission Report says on the other hand, at least as far as PNGS, AGS and powered flight solutions go, that each of these 3 important solutions gave values very close to one another, and not only that, all close to Tranquility Base itself, close to Reed's own improvised rendezvous radar solution.
One off the two sides here is making their side up. It cannot be otherwise. I have been consistent in my position, in my views. Reed has no reason to lie, NASA's reasons are as countless as the stars in the sky, stars that Neil would love one day to count, were he only able to see them. Alas, such tragic tragic irony, the first man on the moon, "star blind" no less. What is the story there anyway with not seeing stars Neil? Do you blast off and travel into cislunar space and turn into a World Wrestling Federation Referee? Become visually impaired by way of some bewitching vacuum black magic??? Frankly Blind? Does the vacuum of space somehow make your brain soft so stuff doesn't register?
This is all old. I didn't come all of this way to rehash, and so let's dig ever so much deeper my friends, shall we not?
The Apollo 11 Mission Report offers on pages 5-7 and 5-8;
"During the lunar surface stay, several unsuccessful attempts were made by the Command Module Pilot to locate the lunar module through the sextant using sighting coordinates transmitted from the ground. Estimates of the landing coordinates were obtained from the lunar module computer, the lunar surface gravity alignment of the platform, and the limited interpretation of the geological features during descent. Figure 5-14 shows
the areas that were tracked and the times of closest approach that were used for the sightings. It can be seen that the actual landing site, as determined from films taken during the descent, did not lie near the center of the sextant field of view for any of the coordinates used; therefore, the ability to acquire the lunar module from a 60-mile orbit can neither be established nor denied. The Command Module Pilot reported it was possible to scan only one grid square during a single pass. Because of the unsuccessful attempts to sight the lunar module from the command module, the decision was made to track the command module from the lunar module using the rendezvous radar. The command module was acquired at a range of 79.9 miles and a closing rate of 3236 ft/sec, and loss of track occurred at 85.3 miles with a receding range-rate of 3531 ft/sec (fig. 5-15). The inertial measurement unit was successfully aligned two more times prior to lift-off, once to obtain a drift check and once to establish the proper inertial orientation for lift-off. The drift check indicated normal system operation, as discussed in section 9.6. An abort guidance system alignment was also performed prior to liftoff; however, a procedural error caused an azimuth misalignment which resulted in the out-of-plane velocity error discussed in section 9.6.2."
Let's take a look at the table referenced above 5-14;
So here are the "7 points", the 7 map referenced points that Collins was allegedly given as clues each time he made a simulated rev about the moon. Why are they feeding Collins these points as his sextant jump start positions? Coordinates with latitudes of P,N,M,E, and K? What in bloody all space-time get out does P,N,M,E,and K have to do with J? Yes JAY, JAY as in Juliet!!!! If the real-time solutions for the powered flight processor, AGS and PNGS are all located in Squares J/5, J/6, J/7. Why aren't they telling Collins to look there? At least ONCE! JAY!!! Real-time Jay! CapCom, tell Collins for God's sake! It is not as though everybody doesn't know the powered flight system was viewed as the most accurate/dependable of the systems. So they have real time solutions for PNGS, AGS and Powered Fight, all close to Tranquility Base. Furthermore, the three solutions all agree with one another. Yet, incredibly!, they are not passed along to Collins. Instead, he is told to look in the grid along latitudes P,M,N,E,K BUT!!! NEVER JAY!
What is going on? Well obviously, the real-time solutions as presented in the Mission Report were not genuinely "real-time" at the time of the actual pretended landing. One would assume from all of this that the PNGS, AGS and Powered flight solutions that we see in the Mission Report were made up "after the fact" to quote our glorious commander and favorite Not So Very Eagle Scout. During the pretended landing, someone, doesn't necessarily have to be him , but more likely than not it is Schiesser, is playing with all of this. Reed and the Flight Dynamics people are told AGS, PNGS, and powered flight solutions are in latitudes P,N,M,E,K, all over the bloody military map. Of course if you published that in the Apollo 11 Mission Report people would go, "What?!!!! I thought that powered flight system was pretty dang good for tracking, how did it see the Eagle way out there in latitude E?", or whatever. So then they publish this bogus doctored jive and pretend first of all that this actually happened, and secondly, that the solutions agreed with one another. Not only did they agree, but as a matter of fact, were downright close to Tranquility Base to begin with as any of the people close to the project, working within the project, but nevertheless duped, would have expected.
It's enough to make you scream, the jerks! But whether one gives in and screams or not, it is straightforward evidence of trajectory data/telemetry fraud, and shows/proves the entire Apollo 11 Mission to be fraudulent in consequence.
I'll look at this in all the more detail moving forward, and will take a look at the other coordinate solutions as well, AOT and maps/photos, in my later posts. This is a rich vein of deceit and merits much time, energy and attention.
