ozeco41
Philosopher
The building was on fire....How do you explain the thick smoke for so long ?
The building was on fire....How do you explain the thick smoke for so long ?
I find it very amusing the lengths troofs will go to prove their point.
faked? I watched it fall and ran from the massive cloud it released. The event is so well documented on so many different videos and even the criminals at NIST could not deny it the fact that WTC7 exhibited freefall acceleration during it's implosion. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw
What else do you need to know to be 100% certain explosives were used?
There is a mountain of other evidence that leads to the same conclusion. But it isnt necessary/ WTC 7 proves it beyond any shadow of a doubt.
some people will deny and ignore reality until it is conveyed to them by the talking heads of their TV's
.. scary
What did people say about the cloud ? Was it hot or warm ? There are reports of people being burned by it. One cop's coat was set on fire and another said that he thought it might have set the cars on fire. One civilian got first and second degree burns doewn his back when the dust went down his collar. He must have been pretty close I guess,faked? I watched it fall and ran from the massive cloud it released. The event is so well documented on so many different videos and even the criminals at NIST could not deny it the fact that WTC7 exhibited freefall acceleration during it's implosion. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw
What else do you need to know to be 100% certain explosives were used?
There is a mountain of other evidence that leads to the same conclusion. But it isnt necessary/ WTC 7 proves it beyond any shadow of a doubt.
some people will deny and ignore reality until it is conveyed to them by the talking heads of their TV's
.. scary
What did people say about the cloud ? Was it hot or warm ? There are reports of people being burned by it. One cop's coat was set on fire and another said that he thought it might have set the cars on fire. One civilian got first and second degree burns doewn his back when the dust went down his collar. He must have been pretty close I guess,
Sure you did.faked? I watched it fall and ran from the massive cloud it released.
faked? I watched it fall and ran from the massive cloud it released. The event is so well documented on so many different videos and even the criminals at NIST could not deny it the fact that WTC7 exhibited freefall acceleration during it's implosion. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw
What else do you need to know to be 100% certain explosives were used?
There is a mountain of other evidence that leads to the same conclusion. But it isnt necessary/ WTC 7 proves it beyond any shadow of a doubt.
some people will deny and ignore reality until it is conveyed to them by the talking heads of their TV's
.. scary
faked? I watched it fall and ran from the massive cloud it released. The event is so well documented on so many different videos and even the criminals at NIST could not deny it the fact that WTC7 exhibited freefall acceleration during it's implosion. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw
What else do you need to know to be 100% certain explosives were used?
There is a mountain of other evidence that leads to the same conclusion. But it isnt necessary/ WTC 7 proves it beyond any shadow of a doubt.
some people will deny and ignore reality until it is conveyed to them by the talking heads of their TV's
.. scary
Should be written more like this.
I posted something I knew that you wouldn't explain, and you didn't explain it, in fact you didn't provide an explanation that was even plausible so you lose and I win."
That's about it.
faked? I watched it fall and ran from the massive cloud it released. The event is so well documented on so many different videos and even the criminals at NIST could not deny it the fact that WTC7 exhibited freefall acceleration during it's implosion. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw
What else do you need to know to be 100% certain explosives were used?
There is a mountain of other evidence that leads to the same conclusion. But it isnt necessary/ WTC 7 proves it beyond any shadow of a doubt.
some people will deny and ignore reality until it is conveyed to them by the talking heads of their TV's
.. scary
version
How do you explain the thick smoke for so long ?
What did people say about the cloud ? Was it hot or warm ? There are reports of people being burned by it. One cop's coat was set on fire and another said that he thought it might have set the cars on fire. One civilian got first and second degree burns doewn his back when the dust went down his collar. He must have been pretty close I guess,
The faker reveals all...
The faker reveals all...
Name some names and sources.One cop's coat was set on fire and another said that he thought it might have set the cars on fire. One civilian got first and second degree burns doewn his back when the dust went down his collar. He must have been pretty close I guess,
faked?
What else do you need to know to be 100% certain explosives were used?
.. scary
And yet her lungs weren't searedName some names and sources.
The only person I know of whose coat caught fire . That would be Ondrovic. But by her account and Deshore's, she was running near some exploding cars. She pretty obviously got burning gasoline spalshed on her. Hard to consider anything she says as evidence of much of anything, since she was, at the time, in a total, non-thinking panic.
Burning debris from the building and some of the jet fuel that made it to the street in the second crash set the cars on fire. We have video here somewhere of cars burning before any buildings fell. No fire fighter thinks this odd.
Name the civilian and your source.
snip
What else do you need to know to be 100% certain explosives were used?
snip