CIA threatens "Press for Truth" producers over release of new documentary

[sheeplesnshills]

Spend an afternoon digesting the information I posted in this thread and the question will be answered.

LOL says the person who can't digest the simple fact that people cannot see through buildings............you simply have very poor judgement and so you cannot be surprised when people ignore your suggestions to check anything.

Baby steps.....face up to the fact that you are wrong on the blatantly obvious stuff and then we might think your opinion of some value. As of now you are merely a joke.

 

[carlitos]

Kind of like Alanis?

It's ironic that you would post that right after my post.

 

[Childlike Empress]

Thanks for the bumps, folks. Anybody listened to it? Great investigative journalism with an impressive series of interviewees we got there. Clarke: "Pissed doesn't even begin to describe my feelings ..."

Part 1 was released today as audio with transcript. The names of analysts "Michael" and "Frances" are redacted, at least for the moment.

[...] The documentary Who is Rich Blee? features several interviews with direct witnesses to events beginning in early 2000, within the CIA’s Bin Laden Station, headed by its chief Richard Blee, tasked with racking suspect Al-Qaeda operatives.

The release comes after the video in August of a controversial interview with Richard Clarke and follows a delay after the CIA made veiled threats of federal prosecution if the documentary revealed the names of two CIA analysts.

Beginning from a scant footnote in the 9/11 Commission Report (Endnote 44, Chapter 6) the program carefully builds a narrative how CIA intelligence about two future hijackers, Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, including their presence in San Diego, was repeatedly withheld from the FBI and the White House.

These former officials, several of them for the first time, recount their experiences with the CIA and their suspicions surrounding violations of protocol and seemingly purposeful “bungling” of critical intelligence the CIA had in hand, that if shared, they believe would have likely prevented the 9/11 attacks.

Repeated and ongoing attempts by the CIA to obscure the facts around this case have raised concerns about possible criminal acts, and brought increased scrutiny on the CIA and a pattern of obstruction there in the 18 months leading up to 9/11. [...]

 

[carlitos]

I know the real reason why "Frances" was redacted.

 

[bill smith]

Thanks for the bumps, folks. Anybody listened to it? Great investigative journalism with an impressive series of interviewees we got there. Clarke: "Pissed doesn't even begin to describe my feelings ..."

delete

 

[Childlike Empress]

I know the real reason why "Frances" was redacted.

Given what she did, do you think the CIA's demands and threats are justified?

 

[The Big Dog]

Thanks for the bumps, folks. Anybody listened to it? Great investigative journalism with an impressive series of interviewees we got there. Clarke: "Pissed doesn't even begin to describe my feelings ..."

Again, I am fascinated by this. Unfortunately, I have been spending all of my time focusing on the National Security Alert.

They tell me that "It wasn't Flight 77 and it didn't hit the building
The majority of the witnesses we spoke with did not describe it as or said it looked like an American Airlines. It was a military plane and it flew over the building."

So, my thinking is because CE on JREF has repeatedly insisted that CIT is correct, this whole thing with Press for Truth is some sort of disinfo campaign.

I am going to the CIT's site and report this at "Operation Accountability"!
Craig and Aldo will know what to do!

 

[Childlike Empress]

Oh the silence, Carlitos. Yeah, I know you have no clue what she did because as you admitted you are only here to take cheap shots at me and muddy the waters, like your buddies. But do you know why I asked? No? Because contrary to you I really knew why the CIA was so eager to keep her name out of this and wanted to give you another opportunity to embarrass yourself. The names are out, with all the details in the documentary it was child's play to deduce them, at least for Sibel Edmonds and associates.

Boiling Frogs Post has now confirmed the identity of the CIA analyst at the heart of a notorious failure in the run-up to the September 11th tragedy. Her name is Alfreda Frances Bikowsky and she is the current director of the CIA Jihad Unit. Through three credible sources and documents we have confirmed Ms. Bikowsky’s former titles and positions, including her start at the CIA as an analyst for the Soviet Desk, her position as one of the case officers at the CIA’s Bin Laden Unit-Alec Station, her central role and direct participation in the CIA’s rendition-torture and black sites operations, and her current position as director of the CIA’s Global Jihad Unit.

Alfreda Frances Bikowsky is the person described in New Yorker journalist Jane Mayer’s book The Dark Side as having flown in to watch the waterboarding of terrorist Khalid Sheikh Mohammad without being assigned to do so. “Its not supposed to be entertainment,” superiors were said to have told her. She was also at the center of “the el-Masri incident,” in which an innocent German citizen was kidnapped by the CIA in 2003 and held under terrible conditions without charges for five months in a secret Afghan prison. The AP characterized it as “one of the biggest diplomatic embarrassments of the U.S. war on terrorism.”

Both the previous and current administrations appear to have deemed Alfreda Frances Bikowsky’s direct involvement in intentional obstruction of justice, intentional cover up, lying to Congress, and overseeing rendition-kidnapping-torture practices as qualifying factors to have kept promoting her. She now leads the CIA’s Global Jihad Unit and is a close advisor to the President.

Hope you feel safer now, Yankistanis.

 

[The Big Dog]

Hope you feel safer now, Yankistanis.

I don't, not with MONSTERS like this running around:

"The First Known Accomplice? (Featuring Lloyde England)

This presentation features our first interview with Lloyde England, the infamous taxicab driver who claims his windshield was speared by light pole #1. His account has been proven false by the 13 times corroborated witnesses who place plane on the north side of the gas station far from the light pole that allegedly hit Lloyde's car. The debate regarding what happened at the Pentagon can be boiled down to whether you choose to believe the north side witnesses or Lloyde. While the interview in this piece was conducted in 2006 before we had obtained the north side evidence, please also view our follow-up interview with Lloyde from 2008 where we confront him with the information proving his story false: The Eye of the Storm."

This whole thread sounds like disinfo, because even a *********** 12 year old can see that it directly contradicts all the fine, fine work done by the wonder twins, Shakey Craig and The Buffet Slayer.

Right CE?

 

[twinstead]

gotta love kookfights

 

[Childlike Empress]

16.5, the readers of this thread will not care about your off-topic nonsense or what it means. Perhaps they will wonder why it is allowed to go on, but that's all. What matters is that they get the information, which is not dependent on me being credible or not.

But you know that. It's just the only option left in the textbook. Sucks, eh?

 

[The Big Dog]

16.5, the readers of this thread will not care about your off-topic nonsense or what it means. Perhaps they will wonder why it is allowed to go on, but that's all. What matters is that they get the information, which is not dependent on me being credible or not.

But you know that. It's just the only option left in the textbook. Sucks, eh?

Off topic? I am taking the very information that you are posting in this very thread and using it to demonstate that it directly contradicts one of your theories regarding what happened at the Pentagon.

Well, hell, you got away with spamming the NSA thing for sooooo long, I thought it absolutely essential to point out that this thread, posted by you, completely contradicts your pals' idiotic flyover theory, that you repeatedly spammed in other threads.

So it is DIRECTLY on topic. Your opening post and the information therein is directly contradictory to the CIT fly over theory.

But you know that. Hand waving it away is just the only option left in the textbook. Sucks, eh?

/Someday a Truther is going to admit to being wrong. Someday.....

 

[Childlike Empress]

Off topic? I am taking the very information that you are posting in this very thread and using it to demonstate that it directly contradicts one of your theories regarding what happened at the Pentagon.

Well, hell, you got away with spamming the NSA thing for sooooo long, I thought it absolutely essential to point out that this thread, posted by you, completely contradicts your pals' idiotic flyover theory.

/Someday a Truther is going to admit to being wrong. Someday.....

You are attacking the messenger. Nobody cares.

 

[The Big Dog]

You are attacking the messenger. Nobody cares.

absolutely false. Now while your opening post consisted of exactly a link and a quote, it is certainly permissible to point out that it manages to contradict the No Planer at the Pentagon theory.

The fact that you posted it is very significant, because it seems that the OP's claim that the two men were hijackers is bull **** or the CIT claim that they were not even on the military planes is bull ****.

Which is it?

 

[bill smith]

Oh the silence, Carlitos. Yeah, I know you have no clue what she did because as you admitted you are only here to take cheap shots at me and muddy the waters, like your buddies. But do you know why I asked? No? Because contrary to you I really knew why the CIA was so eager to keep her name out of this and wanted to give you another opportunity to embarrass yourself. The names are out, with all the details in the documentary it was child's play to deduce them, at least for Sibel Edmonds and associates.




Hope you feel safer now, Yankistanis.

So who is likely to carry the can for all this ?

 

[Childlike Empress]

So who is likely to carry the can for all this ?

We'll see. With the parallel developing new Saudi stuff and Bob Graham calling for reopening the investigation, it could get interesting. This is making headlines outside the usual "fringe" sites. And all the interviewees are of course aware of the end product, too.

 

[bill smith]

We'll see. With the parallel developing new Saudi stuff and Bob Graham calling for reopening the investigation, it could get interesting. This is making headlines outside the usual "fringe" sites. And all the interviewees are of course aware of the end product, too.

I'm not up to speed on this stuff but anything that will give the fire a thorough poking is good for me. We'll see what other stuff gets dragged into the open.

 

[carlitos]

Oh the silence, Carlitos. Yeah, I know you have no clue what she did because as you admitted you are only here to take cheap shots at me and muddy the waters, like your buddies. But do you know why I asked? No? Because contrary to you I really knew why the CIA was so eager to keep her name out of this and wanted to give you another opportunity to embarrass yourself. The names are out, with all the details in the documentary it was child's play to deduce them, at least for Sibel Edmonds and associates.




Hope you feel safer now, Yankistanis.

Wow. You must not have gotten the joke with the youtube link. I read the articles. She apparently did some bad things. I have mixed feelings about "outing" mid-level civil servants. I'm ambivalent.

That said, I don't know how this has anything to do with "9/11 Conspiracy Theories." Could you enlighten me please?

 

[Childlike Empress]

Wow. You must not have gotten the joke with the youtube link. I read the articles. She apparently did some bad things. I have mixed feelings about "outing" mid-level civil servants. I'm ambivalent.

That said, I don't know how this has anything to do with "9/11 Conspiracy Theories." Could you enlighten me please?

You haven't read the articles if you have to ask where the conspiracy is.

 

[Childlike Empress]

I'm not up to speed on this stuff but anything that will give the fire a thorough poking is good for me. We'll see what other stuff gets dragged into the open.

Exactly.