• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
JLord said:
And claiming that someone can't beat you up because there is no way for them to lawfully do so is similar to what you are claiming. However if I am able to beat you up because I have immensely more power than you, the police won't stop it and in fact go along with it, the courts won't stop it, and there is nothing you can do to stop me, it would be dishonest for someone to go around saying "he can't beat you up if you do XYZ..." You can talk aobut how unjust it is, but it is simply false to say I can't do it when in fact you know that I can and there is nothing you can do to stop it.

It may be a philosophical challenge to ponder how I can "LAWFULLY" govern you, but the practical question that people seeking legal advice want to know is "what CAN they do to me under their rules." Not "what can they do to me under Rob Menard's sense of justice." I don't mind debating the philosphical reasons behind various laws, but that is a seperate issue from someone like yourself who is claiming that using THEIR rules, there is a way out that THEY will accept.
Click to expand...

Over $100MILLION is discharged student loans would suggest that it is in fact how it is, and not merely how it should be. That is not to say that everything is how I say, but much of it is....
 
FreemanMenard said:
Prefer not to. I do not have his permission to do so, and am working on something that is best not divulged too soon.
Click to expand...
What, like all the other things you claimed to have started yet never completed?
I challenge you, Menard: Name this judge.

Thanks for understanding!

:D
Click to expand...
Make no mistake, I think I can safely say we all understand you.
 
Stacey Grove said:
What, like all the other things you claimed to have started yet never completed?


Make no mistake, I think I can safely say we all understand you.
Click to expand...

Really? YOu can safely state you speak for everyone? What a hive mentality you must all have! The Borg would be proud! Well then smart guy, tell me why I am even here on this forum? Not a single one of you have been able to figure it out to date. :D
 
FreemanMenard said:
IWell this has been fun! I have to go now, and prepare for my meeting later with a man who agrees with me. And oh, he is a judge. :D
Click to expand...


Of the freshness of cabbages?

Or does he agree with you that your "entertainment" business is quite entertaining to watch from a train wreck sort of perspective?

Will your "friend" be wearing his robes and sash?
 
Stacey Grove said:
What, like all the other things you claimed to have started yet never completed?
I challenge you, Menard: Name this judge.


Make no mistake, I think I can safely say we all understand you.
Click to expand...

I challenge you to govern me without my consent. Been doing that for a while now, and none has accepted the challenge. So why should I accept your challenge when you are too much a coward to even attempt mine?
 
FreemanMenard said:
I challenge you to govern me without my consent. Been doing that for a while now, and none has accepted the challenge. So why should I accept your challenge when you are too much a coward to even attempt mine?
Click to expand...

Name the judge, Menard.

FreemanMenard said:
Really? Well then smart guy, tell me why I am even here on this forum? Not a single one of you have been able to figure it out to date. :D
Click to expand...

I have already stated it on here.
I believe you to be a sad old git who feels inferior about how he has never got anywhere in life, looks at others and realises how he has achieved nothing and frequents forums to receive the attention he craves.
It's sad really.
 
FreemanMenard said:
Prefer not to. I do not have his permission to do so, and am working on something that is best not divulged too soon.

Thanks for understanding!

:D
Click to expand...

Proof yet, Rob? No, what a surprise.

You're now off to meet a member of the judiciary who says you're right on all this? Course you are. :rolleyes:

Now, just to once again confirm that your "consent of the government theory" has been answered and debunked, here is a link to my post as but one example of many on this thread which demonstrate that you are talking cack.

Now, please come back and produce the evidence to shut us all up or get back to your cabin and chop some wood or whatever you do.
 
Border Reiver said:
Of the freshness of cabbages?

Or does he agree with you that your "entertainment" business is quite entertaining to watch from a train wreck sort of perspective?

Will your "friend" be wearing his robes and sash?
Click to expand...

Did I call him 'friend'? Nope you did that! More of your strawman tactics I see. And I doubt he will be wearing his robe for an informal meeting over coffee, but you never know!
 
BTW I remember Menard using the "I've been contacted by a judge who agrees with me" story a long time ago. Possibly two years.
Yet, still nothing.
 
Still no evidence, Rob?

Got the evidence that you are immune from all statutory law, except those laws that you agree with? A verifiable court order or letter from the Canadian government should do the trick.

No? Thought not

Been telling people that this is what you have achieved? Yes
Been receiving money on the back of it? Yes
Been giving other bogus 'legal' advice and receiving money from that? Yes

There is only one fitting description in those circumstances.

Once again, evidence please. Alternatively you are welcome to continue digging your own hole.

Probably best for you that you put up or shut up, but watching you dig is fun.
 
FreemanMenard said:
Again with the selling... can't seem to grasp simple concepts that do not support your previous beliefs eh?
Click to expand...

Oh are you giving it away now? Someone earlier pointed to your WFS website where your information is for sale - have you forgotten....hey if its just a donation I think we should have everyone here order it up - and not donate.....LOL

So can you show evidence that the stuff you don't sell works? What I cannot hear you??? LOL
 
Last edited:
FreemanMenard said:
I challenge you to govern me without my consent. Been doing that for a while now, and none has accepted the challenge. So why should I accept your challenge when you are too much a coward to even attempt mine?
Click to expand...

Yeah, we have likely not accepted that challenge because we can't govern you without your consent. However, the government (those nasty old guys with all of the public support, legitimacy, guns and tanks) most assuredly can. Indeed, they're doing it right now.

Anyway, this has been a hilarious visit as always. Thanks.
 
Stacey Grove said:
BTW I remember Menard using the "I've been contacted by a judge who agrees with me" story a long time ago. Possibly two years.
Yet, still nothing.
Click to expand...

Along with all the other yarns.

The driving without insurance etc one was great, made himself look a proper idiot there. Then there was Freeman Valley of course. We could go on...
 
Just to add to the chorus: why not provide us with some evidence so that you can take your rightful place alongside Magellan and history's other great visionaries? Or you could continue to play pedantic word games and continue to be widely regarded as a you-know-what. Seems an easy choice to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom