1100 people unaccounted for - how did that happen, in your opinion? Is this because explosions ripped everything apart, turned mostly everything into fine dust, caused all the material of the towers to tumble down in enormous turbulences, and thus dispersed human remains widely and beyond recognition?
Even though I may from time to time hypothesize [if only to share what may be the most likely scenario based on available evidence). ]I generally try to stick to the facts. Hypothesizing is unnecessary really, in light of such a multitude of different & damning facts stemming from different ources, that all point in the same direction.
The extremely rapid and explosive nature of the destruction of the Twin Towers are established beyond all doubt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5joqbu7gkM
Atavism, please, read the OP, read my recent responses: We do assume in this thread that there was molten steel. You don't need to prove it! Okay?? Stop it!
I will take a look..thanks. That said, what I write here is not for one person..even if I respond to something you wrote..You have the option to skip it instead of demanding silence because you believe it's redundant. For others, possibly looking at this material for the first time, it's important to separate fact from fiction and establish the actual issues at the center of 9-11 Truth. Especially in a forum so richly populated by people who dont know the difference. People who argue that ridiculous claims like No Planes or video fakery, etc, are part of 9-11 Truth when they most definitely are not. Or some who simply deny and ignore facts and make absurd claims like, 'wtc7's implosion was not symmetrical and did not look like an implosion."
You have not answered the OP yet at all.
As such features (molten metal, wtc7's implosion, 100 day fires, pulverized concrete, etc) have never EVER been seen without the use of explosives and in controlled demolitions,, the burden of proof clearly lies with anyone saying these were natural events not involving the use of explosives.
The heart of this thread is: Why is molten steel a sign for inside job? You must have a theory that explains how steel not only melted (yes, we know that thermite can melt steel, yaddayadda), but how thermite or molten steel that was in the towers before the collapses survived the collapses such that molten steel could still be observed a long time after the collapse. Why did these materials not disperse? Why did the thermite charges survive when 1100 human bodies were so terribly minced and dispersed that they never even found as much as a knuckle in one piece? Why did steel that melted before the liquid not disperse and cool to solidify of in a matter of minutes, if not seconds?
The 'materials' (building contents) did disperse, very widely and violently in every direction.:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5joqbu7gkM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSApOavkHg8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JnZbYXcbqw
"
Why is molten steel a sign for inside job?" Because it, along with a host of other well documented features, could not be present without the use additional energetic materials. Materials which Islamic terrorists could have have had access to the buildings to install.
We see molten metal pouring from the South Tower just below the point where the building will, moments later, rip apart. It was documented in the FEMA BPAT Appendix C where again, we see the effects of structural steel that has been attacked by a 'high temperature corrosive' that left races of sulfur in the steel itself. They did cool, eventually. And some parts,, like the iron micropheres that are so prevalent in the dust (that RJ Lee established them as a 'signature' of WTC dust) were formed under conditions hot enough to melt steel.. and cooled and formed into spheres, as they flew through the air in every direction cooled much sooner than the smoldering pits that remained of the Twin Towers. The underground infernos that were so extremely hot were finally extinguished 100 days later. Same with how explosive their (wtc1&2) destruction was. The North Tower was hit between floors 92-96 -approx. How can we even imagine that gravity alone could account what happened to that building once it's explosive destruction sequence began? Almost 90% of teh North Tower remained intact below the crash zone and we are supposed to believe that gravity and office fires alone caused such astonishing and thorough levels of destruction and massive debris fields chock full of anomalies only explosives could account for.
They were so explosive that 200 dna tests came back matching a single individual. The streets were littered with body parts in every direction one looked. One victim was identified only by his femur which was located 2 blocks from the site. The smaller debris was carted off to Freshkills Landfill in Staten Island where it was systematically spread out on conveyor belts which then passed by lines with gloved attendants whose job it was to scour through it and locate any human remains they could find. Despite this operation having gone on for 2 years and the use of advanced dna recovery techniques (many victims were identified from test-tube sized fragments), no genetic trace has been found for approximately 1100 victims.
We do not (and cannot) know every detail of how these events were carried out to know with complete certainty that explosives must have been involved.
There are traces of hi-tech thermitic material in the dust. That does not means the "charges survived." The plane impact were local (and small compared to the overall size of the buildings) and asymmetrical. Perhaps more than one type of explosives was used. Maybe thermite was used to cut the columns and other explosives to blast them apart. The evidence clearly supports such a claim.
Why didnt the sites cool quicker? is a good question but the fact that they didnt and that they were so hot for so long (and this just another in the long list of anomalous features that indicate the presence of additional energetic materials), is the critical issue here.
