Unknown does not mean "alien" it means "yet to be identified". A UFO may have no mundane explanation we are aware of, but that does not mean that the explanation is alien to us, or our technology.
Nobody has offered an explanation because nobody else was able to witness the event, and only have one, unvarified report to go on. All your discussion means is that it less likely to be a U2 than previously thought. That does not mean it MUST be alien in nature. You may find this talk of semantics dull, but frankly, if you aren't getting the foundations right, no argument you build upon them will stand.
It is very unwise to assume that "unidentified" or "unknown" translate to "alien" or "outside of recognised science. That is a very large aassumption that will bias your attitude towards the data.
It starts out being alien to us the moment the government sends a U2 to investigate what is picked up on their radar and that it was not a threat.
The guy on the link I posted said his family at the base is who recorded it.
When he came back from his three-day leave is when he recorded the incident.
So I know that some in here aren’t checking or reading my link when some one else said, " they couldn't find anything about a sighting above Gary Indiana in 57 -58...
I gave you an eyewitness account with multiple witnesses plus with radar confirmations.
If they thought that it is a firefly or a light house why did they persist and send a plane, possibly a U2 in the vicinity to investigate it which caused it to accelerate straight up at unbelievable speed at which point the U2 probably went east and then north heading towards midway field.
This is what your response to my question :
Quote:
I wonder what the U2s slowest speed is?
RoboTimbo says:
Zero.
Anybody with half a brain knows I am talking about the slowest flying speed, why do you twist what is understood?
This is what you do with everything that is brought to the table.
So how fast are the atoms moving in the plane that is doing zero on the ground?
[irony]!
Just like what is in yellow above?
Are you kidding me?
20 people in the ally with radio reporting this, Nike Missile base has it on their radar, some one sends a plane up for a closer look, they possibly have photos or at least the military does. The plane circles around several times so the pilot is an eyewitness, probably told to be quiet about the sighting.
Tracking by radar of possibly two objects one known one not known.
Craft zooms straight up at incredible speeds.
But yet this UFO stays still in the sky for over an hour.
If we had some thing like this tech in 57-8 why are we still using explosive technology to move straight up?
So when it's not mundane then what are the possible explanations?
When you eliminate all other possibilities what is left?
It is alien to our physics.
You are then left with only 5-6 possibilities.
Extraterrestrial aliens are one of them but not all of them.
Just because lots of sightings have a mundane explanation does not mean that they all do.
I personally know that some of them are a conveyance that we haven't a clue about or not many clues.
What is being portrayed is that there is another way to move around in a manner that we have no idea about and or that idea is being suppressed by people in power and through greed of those people.
Because there are ways to tap into those electrical/gravitational powers that are prevalent through out the universe.
Other wise why so much blanking out of secret information about them in our government files?
*******.
Akhenaten Originally Posted by ufology
Understanding the semantics is essential to the research.
Answer by Akhenaten It appears to be the totality of the research.
I'll say it again:
Other wise why so much blanking out of secret information about them in our government files?
It's still being suppressed.
Edited by Locknar:
Edited... EVERYONE, please keep the conversation civil/polite.
