• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

How do truthers explain the phone calls?

sheeplesnshills said:
"Having seen the voice morphing technology in action (and a fairly primitive version at that) I don't think it's beyond the bounds of possibility that a lapdog could speak into a phone and have the voice of a passenger come out the other end. They would need a powerful computer and a lot of voice samples. They might even make little mistakes like accidentally giving their full name to a close loved one. Remember the passenger on flight 93 ? 'Hi Mom, it's Mark Bingham here'"


LOL I make those computers............so no, its not possible. and if they could make a mistake why couldn't a passenger under extreme strain? If you are on the phone all the time and leaving message frequently you would normally say exactly that.

you have of course a link to that "assertion" and why would they have the computer programmed with his surname if they knew "he" was phoning his Mom? They are so brilliant yet so incompetent at the same time?
Click to expand...

It was a rush job. Classic terrain for making mistakes.
 
bill smith said:
Yes, I totally deny it, There were no bodies at Shanksville. There was no 757 either. Just some scattered debris that was planted along with some hijacker identification on top along with one of their bandanas.
Click to expand...

Are you intending on joining reality some time soon or no?
 
tmd2_1 said:
I agree it is disgusting. But not for the reasons you think. It's disgusting how little people know about it. Does it "prove" anything, no, but it is awfully suspicious. I know the common response to things like this, is I'm disrespecting Ceecee's grave. Nothing is further from the truth, I'm trying to find out what really happened to her, and the other almost 3000 victims. This of course is assuming something other than the official story is the truth. I can't see how her family would have any problem with it. If I'm wrong, no real disservice is done, who would be against investigating something further?
Click to expand...


Nothing you or any other truther has EVER presented has EVER proven anything, nor will it.

You. Are. All. LIARS.
 
bill smith is a perfect example of what response you will get from truthers if you ask them about the phone calls. That's why it's not worth asking any of them questions about anything. If one can simply make stuff up with no evidence to support it, then one can easily answer ANY question, no matter how hard.

Ridicule is the only answer.
 
Last edited:
sheeplesnshills said:
Bill, we are waiting..........
Click to expand...

Perhaps you missed this post further up....

'' As you may know I think that flight 93 was supposed to hit WTC7 but something went askew leaving an undestroyed building and an extra plane to dispose of. So they were both connected forced errors- two sides of the same coin. The flight 93 ridiculous story was a rush job as was the obvious demolition of WTC7 and both stories are full of holes. The perps and their lapdogs played the emotional side of the flight 93 story as hard as they could on a whole orchestra of violins to turn researchers from looking to deeply into the issue. But in reality they are as vulnerable as all-get-out on that issue. ''

So the flight 93 scenario had to be invented on the fly and they cocked it up, just like they cocked up with WTC7. A rushed job usually leaves traces as we all know.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Perhaps you missed this post further up....

'' As you may know I think that flight 93 was supposed to hit WTC7 but something went askew leaving an undestroyed building and an extra plane to dispose of. So they were both connected forced errors- two sides of the same coin. The flight 93 ridiculous story was a rush job as was the obvious demolition of WTC7 and both stories are full of holes. The perps and their lapdogs played the emotional side of the flight 93 story as hard as they could on a whole orchestra of violins to turn researchers from looking to deeply into the issue. But in reality they are as vulnerable as all-get-out on that issue. ''

So the flight 93 scenario had to be invented on the fly and they cocked it up, just like they cocked up with WTC7. A rushed job usually leaves traces as we all know.
Click to expand...

So someone rigged WTC 7 after they realized Flight 93 wasn't going to hit it?
 
bill smith said:
Perhaps you missed this post further up....

'' As you may know I think that flight 93 was supposed to hit WTC7 but something went askew leaving an undestroyed building and an extra plane to dispose of. So they were both connected forced errors- two sides of the same coin. The flight 93 ridiculous story was a rush job as was the obvious demolition of WTC7 and both stories are full of holes. The perps and their lapdogs played the emotional side of the flight 93 story as hard as they could on a whole orchestra of violins to turn researchers from looking to deeply into the issue. But in reality they are as vulnerable as all-get-out on that issue. ''

So the flight 93 scenario had to be invented on the fly and they cocked it up, just like they cocked up with WTC7. A rushed job usually leaves traces as we all know.
Click to expand...

LOL stop kidding:D, no seriously what do you think they would have had to morph voices for?

and still waiting for that link..... the Mark Bingham answerphone .
 
tmd2_1 said:
I agree it is disgusting. But not for the reasons you think. It's disgusting how little people know about it. Does it "prove" anything, no, but it is awfully suspicious. I know the common response to things like this, is I'm disrespecting Ceecee's grave. Nothing is further from the truth, I'm trying to find out what really happened to her, and the other almost 3000 victims. This of course is assuming something other than the official story is the truth. I can't see how her family would have any problem with it. If I'm wrong, no real disservice is done, who would be against investigating something further?
Click to expand...
Discusting troll is disgusting


 
Dash80 said:
The Pentagon plane is "supposed" to have the wrong parts too.

Seems like truthers want us to believe these perps have research skills just as bad as theirs!

Perp 1: "Oh my god someone planted parts from the wrong type of plane, which idiot did I assign the research to?"

Perp 2: "Uh yeah, that would be me Sir. I just picked up a few scrap parts and did what you asked, planes are all the same anyway... right Sir?"
Click to expand...
.
At "sensitive" crash sites, all the available junk/parts are removed, and others from plain vanilla crashes are sowed, to engage and distract the vultures that find and examine such sites.
I had one of those creeps ask me to go with him to a crash site in Death Valley, where the -bones- of the pilot were still lying around.
The dumb **** never comprehended that personal remains are always removed, sometimes at great expense. Any bones there would be desert sheep, not that he'd know the difference.
 
bill smith said:
You often refer to victim simulation (vicsim) Dash. If you are so desperate to talk about it why not start a new thread or resurrrect an old one ? We can talk about it. Should I hold my breath ?
Click to expand...
So we can sit through a few pages of you and your fellow truthers piss on people who are dead? The vicsim bullcrap doesn't merit discussion, it's just sick.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom