• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Debris removal specialist: Richard riggs saw melted beams, molten steel

Dave Rogers said:
Oh, the irony. You're saying that, if he says he saw molten steel, then that must be true because he's an expert, but it means nothing if he says the fires melted the steel.

I live in a world where, if you accept that one part of a statement has to be examined critically, you have to be equally skeptical about the remaining part of it. It's a place called "reality".

Dave
Click to expand...

No, you live in a world where any witness that says something remotely against the official story is 'examined critically' to the nth degree and branded as mistaken, confused or contradictory....while any witness that supports the official story has their testimony regarded as gospel and anyone who dare question it is disrespecting a 9/11 hero/victim.
 
AndrewBurley said:
No, you live in a world where any witness that says something remotely against the official story is 'examined critically' to the nth degree and branded as mistaken, confused or contradictory....while any witness that supports the official story has their testimony regarded as gospel and anyone who dare question it is disrespecting a 9/11 hero/victim.
Click to expand...

The person in question didn't say anything against any "official story". He simply discussed what it is he thought he saw.

Don't get your panties in a bunch.

But hey, at least us so-called debunkers don't take video's and completely edit them then call it accurate. That's you dolts.
 
AndrewBurley said:
No, you live in a world where any witness that says something remotely against the official story is 'examined critically' to the nth degree and branded as mistaken, confused or contradictory....while any witness that supports the official story has their testimony regarded as gospel and anyone who dare question it is disrespecting a 9/11 hero/victim.
Click to expand...
Your witness does not seem to support your theories... HE EXPLAINED SO HIMSELF!
 
Just another in a long, long, long line of blind and / or stupid truthers not even knowing the evidence THEY PROVIDE debunks their claims.

Unreal.
 
AndrewBurley said:
No, you live in a world where any witness that says something remotely against the official story is 'examined critically' to the nth degree and branded as mistaken, confused or contradictory....while any witness that supports the official story has their testimony regarded as gospel and anyone who dare question it is disrespecting a 9/11 hero/victim.
Click to expand...

LOL!

No. This world is a world in which a truther posted a vid he/she thought made a point in the truthers case.
Riggs was held up as an expert or at least a knowledgeable eyewitness.
You & others joined the thread to ask "is he lying?"
It was then pointed out that he gave an explanation of how the steel became molten.
Now you & the other truthers are scrambling to figure out a way to convince people that while he is knowledgeable enough to identify molten metals by sight. He isn't knowledgeable enough to explain how the metal became molten!:D

It's hilarious!
 
NoahFence said:
Just another in a long, long, long line of blind and / or stupid truthers not even knowing the evidence THEY PROVIDE debunks their claims.

Unreal.
Click to expand...
I sometimes think we're redundant, these dolts regularly debunk themselves.
 
AndrewBurley said:
You don't need to be an expert to see a steel beam that is melting.
Click to expand...

Can you please quote Riggs verbatim where he says that he saw a beam that was melting, i.e. turning from solid to liquid as he watched? Thanks.
 
timhau said:
What does "experience with debris removal" even mean, and why is it relevant? Or did I miss the memo where garbage collectors were declared inerrant?
Click to expand...

For the third time, Mr Riggs ran the demolition company that brought down the Kingdome. He wasn't a garbage collector.
 
AndrewBurley said:
For the third time, Mr Riggs ran the demolition company that brought down the Kingdome. He wasn't a garbage collector.
Click to expand...
So he'd know what a purposely demolished building looked like right? Interestingly he doesn't seem to think it was, in the WTC's case. So your "demolition expert" still doesn't agree with you! STOP. DEBUNKING. YOURSELF!
 
AndrewBurley said:
No, you live in a world where any witness that says something remotely against the official story is 'examined critically' to the nth degree and branded as mistaken, confused or contradictory....while any witness that supports the official story has their testimony regarded as gospel and anyone who dare question it is disrespecting a 9/11 hero/victim.
Click to expand...

How can that be us, when your the ones that run around the internet and on street corners, doing all those things trying to peddle your cult's alternative to reality because you say reality isn't reality and you and only you have "the truth"?
 
Dash80 said:
So he'd know what a purposely demolished building looked like right? Interestingly he doesn't seem to think it was, in the WTC's case. So your "demolition expert" still doesn't agree with you! STOP. DEBUNKING. YOURSELF!
Click to expand...

Where does he say he doesn't think it was demolished?
 
timhau said:
So, why call him a "debris removal specialist" if he is, in fact, The Demolition Man?

BTW, the secret to getting out of the roundabout is not to make the same turn over and over again.
Click to expand...

I didn't call him a debris removal specialist. The History Channel called him that and he didn't object so I am guessing he self identifies as that. Demolition companies remove the debris, perhaps that was his area of expertise.
 
Andrew Burley and Marokkaan..
[devilsadvocate]Riggs is telling the truth and so what is the point? [/devilsadvocate]
 
If Riggs had written a paper or something about how wrong truthers were, the debunkers would be crawling all over it proclaiming what a great experienced expert he is, like Blanchard. But, because he says there was molten steel, he's suddenly not qualified.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom