• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged General Holocaust denial discussion thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's always comforting to see a revisionist talk out of both sides of their mouth. You want to distance yourself from the obvious barrage of lies that has been aimed at me by a psychopath, and which a number of the slower-witted deniers think is terribly funny,
Mea culpa

but on the other hand you still can't resist trying to put "the opposition" on the spot, and now demand that I go explain myself on CODOH?

"Barrage of lies"???? Well I have no knowledge of the specifics, but the very basis of the complaint is not in dispute.

It is not in dispute that the several persons associated with Holocaust Controversies attempted to steal the content and domain of www.deathcamps.org from the people who had contributed the lion share of it. It is also true that before the attempt theft a number of forged materials were insinuated onto the site and this was used as the "justification".

Who forged these materials and who put it onto the site, I can't say. It is beyond dispute that Nick Terry was for a long time a member of the Holocaust Controversies team. Was Nick Terry part of the attempt to steal the website? I believe Dr Terry claims he himself had no personal involvement - and I know of nothing that refutes that.

But he certainly was for a long time associated with people who did.
 
Mea culpa



"Barrage of lies"???? Well I have no knowledge of the specifics, but the very basis of the complaint is not in dispute.

It is not in dispute that the several persons associated with Holocaust Controversies attempted to steal the content and domain of www.deathcamps.org from the people who had contributed the lion share of it. It is also true that before the attempt theft a number of forged materials were insinuated onto the site and this was used as the "justification".

Who forged these materials and who put it onto the site, I can't say. It is beyond dispute that Nick Terry was for a long time a member of the Holocaust Controversies team. Was Nick Terry part of the attempt to steal the website? I believe Dr Terry claims he himself had no personal involvement - and I know of nothing that refutes that.

But he certainly was for a long time associated with people who did.

So Nick, speaking of lies, are you going to devote part of your book to Zisblatt and her lies? Explain how she toured US schools spreading those lies with the tacit blessing of the Holocaust chimp master elite?
 
Mea culpa

"Barrage of lies"???? Well I have no knowledge of the specifics, but the very basis of the complaint is not in dispute.

It is not in dispute that the several persons associated with Holocaust Controversies attempted to steal the content and domain of www.deathcamps.org from the people who had contributed the lion share of it.

This is a lie.

It is also true that before the attempt theft a number of forged materials were insinuated onto the site and this was used as the "justification".

It is true that forged materials were insinuated onto the website and that this was the cause of the split in the ARC group.

Who forged these materials and who put it onto the site, I can't say.

An associate of Chris Webb did that.

It is beyond dispute that Nick Terry was for a long time a member of the Holocaust Controversies team. Was Nick Terry part of the attempt to steal the website? I believe Dr Terry claims he himself had no personal involvement - and I know of nothing that refutes that.

Indeed, the smears thrown at me are baseless.

But he certainly was for a long time associated with people who did.

Nope. Nobody from HC was involved in any attempt to "steal" a website. And you cannot produce any evidence to the contrary, any more than Psycho Lisciotto can.
 
So Nick, speaking of lies, are you going to devote part of your book to Zisblatt and her lies? Explain how she toured US schools spreading those lies with the tacit blessing of the Holocaust chimp master elite?

Have you got any evidence of the "tacit blessing" or is this another made-up piece of Clayton Moore nonsense?
 
So Nick, speaking of lies, are you going to devote part of your book to Zisblatt and her lies? Explain how she toured US schools spreading those lies with the tacit blessing of the Holocaust chimp master elite?

So Clayton, speaking of lies, when are you going to fess up to your many proven lies in this thread?
 
So Clayton, speaking of lies, when are you going to fess up to your many proven lies in this thread?
.
That would be when chimps fly out of an historian's butt and calls them "master".
.
 
.
Strange, no where there does it say "and also without any evidence of any kind".

It goes without being stated that you have no such evidence for, e.g., your assertion that Krege's work proved anything -- but there *is* evidence showing this to be the case. It also goes without saying that you will never get around to admitting this, but again plenty of evidence posts that supports that view.

As is normal behaviour for a group of people whom I am currently restrained from describing with an apt term which rhymes with "imps".
.
 
Last edited:
So Nick, speaking of lies, are you going to devote part of your book to Zisblatt and her lies? Explain how she toured US schools spreading those lies with the tacit blessing of the Holocaust chimp master elite?
This is Clayton's best idea so far. The Lies of Zisblatt are the single most important topic that can be discussed. No matter if Joachim Neander has written an excellent article on The Lies of Zisblatt, re-write it. No matter what the topic, bring up The Lies of Zisblatt. If Nick Terry's book is about the Courland Pocket, for example, there should be at least one chapter on The Lies of Zisblatt, one chapter on how her Lies have been used to terrify children and poison the minds of millions, and one chapter on those who tacitly bless Zisblatt. I myself would suggest a chapter also on the Wire Pullers behind Zisblatt.
 
This is as a good idea. Wendy Lower's "Nazi Empire-building in Ukraine," should have included those. If i may make a further suggestion: I think that any Holocaust book whatsoever to be published in the future upon any aspect of the Holocaust should contain at least three (possibly five chapters) upon Irene Zisblatt.
 
This is Clayton's best idea so far. The Lies of Zisblatt are the single most important topic that can be discussed.

The lies of Zizblatt are representative, as are the lies of Wiernik, Wiesel, Bomba, Meuller, Rosenberg, Vrba, et. al. There is not a single credible Jewish holohoax witness. All one has to do to discover the holohoax is a complete fabrication is to read the actual 'testimony' of any of these pathological liars.
 
The lies of Zizblatt are representative, as are the lies of Wiernik, Wiesel, Bomba, Meuller, Rosenberg, Vrba, et. al.
.
The lies of Irving are representative, as are the lies of Zundel, Rudolf, CM, DZ, Krege, Leuchter, Gerdes, Smith, Hannover, and *you* et. al.
.
There is not a single credible Jewish holohoax witness.
.
Even if true, so what? There are still all those non-Jewish witnesses
.
All one has to do to discover the holohoax is a complete fabrication is to read the actual 'testimony' of any of these pathological liars.
.
... and ignore, dismiss or distort the mountains of other evidence we have.

Sill haven't gotten your name and number for the ad, Saggs -- it would appear you aren't in favour of that little 'experiment' actually being done after all. Whose bright idea was it to place the ad, anyway?
.
 
The lies of Zizblatt are representative, as are the lies of Wiernik, Wiesel, Bomba, Meuller, Rosenberg, Vrba, et. al. There is not a single credible Jewish holohoax witness. All one has to do to discover the holohoax is a complete fabrication is to read the actual 'testimony' of any of these pathological liars.
Since the only historian I know of who's "used" Zisblatt is Dr Neander, and he rejected her account, I am not sure what Zisblatt is representative of. But still, let's discuss some actual Jewish witnesses.

- I am curious about the lies told by Oscar Strawczynski - and even a comparison of his account of his time in Treblinka to that of Wiernik. Can you be so kind as to share with us the lies of Strawczynski and proof of his lying?

- I wonder what lies were told by Yudis Trojak and Pesye Schloss about what they went through. Can you be so kind as to share with us the lies of Trojak and Schloss and proof of their lying?
 
Last edited:
Rather than watch Saggy repeat the same names over and over, perhaps it's time to throw a more substantive list of witnesses on the table. What follows are the names of eyewitnesses who have at one point or another been discussed by Holocaust deniers since the days of Rassinier, in what passes for "print". The list is not necessarily complete, but it covers probably most of the people that deniers have discussed. There are more than 200 names.

Unfortunately, nowhere have deniers discussed all of these witnesses together. And by discussed I mean something more than "they're all liars" or "they were all tortured" if they were Nazis. As can be seen, the list includes Nazis, Ukrainians, Poles, Frenchwomen, German opponents of the Nazis, and Jews of many different nationalities. They talked to the Soviets, the Poles, the British, the Americans, the French, the West Germans; or they published their memoirs all over the world, over a period of many decades.

There are of course 10s of 1000s more witnesses, but as this set of 200+ have been hand-picked by deniers themselves, they are a perfectly reasonable sample for discussion.

The list even includes witnesses who are dismissed by the mainstream. Unfortunately there are only six of those, but hey, with hard work and perseverance, a revisionist could surely come up with a nice, convincing, book-length case against all the witnesses, and prove (I mean really prove) that all of them were liars, not simply offer a handwave and a vague sweeping assertion.

I repeat: these are witnesses various deniers have discussed. So this isn't inflicting any kind of mental cruelty, like mentioning the 1400 witnesses interrogated before the Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, or the 400 that actually appeared on the witness stand. No, it's not much more than 200 witnesses.

German– Auschwitz (24)
Rudolf Höss, Hans Aumeier, Maximilian Grabner, Friedrich Entress, Johann Kremer, Horst Fischer, Josef Kramer, Fritz Klein, Franz Hössler, Konrad Morgen, Hans Münch, Richard Baer, Walter Dejaco, Henry Storch, Hans Stark, Erich Mussfeldt, Pery Broad, Richard Böck, Karl Hölbinger, Josef Erber, Oswald Kaduk, Nowak, Kurt Prüfer, Karl Schultze
German,Collaborator –
Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor, Treblinka (24)

Franz Stangl, Josef Oberhauser, Kurt Gerstein, Wilhelm Pfannenstiel, Hermann Höfle, Franz Suchomel, Willi Metz, Otto Horn, Erich Bauer, Alfred Ittner, Gustav Wagner, Franz Hödl, Erwin Lambert, Heinrich Barbl, Heinrich Gley, Werner Karl Dubois, Karl Alfred Schluch, Erich Fuchs, Vassily Pankov, Mikhail Razgoniaev, Ignat Danilchenko, Pavel Leleko, Walter Piller, Bruno Israel
German – Other (27)
Hermann Göring, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Dieter Wisliceny, Adolf Eichmann, Wilhelm Höttl, Richard Korherr, August Becker, Walter Rauff, Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski, Friedrich Jeckeln, Kurt Becher, Oswald Pohl, Gerhard Maurer, Kurt Schmidt-Klevenow, Anton Kaindl, Hermann Pister, Ilse Koch, Alois Hoellriegel, Paul Waldmann, Oscha Otto Hoppe, Theo Schölen, Otto Ohlendorf, Ostubaf Haensch, Paul Blobel, Hermann Graebe, Eberhard Wetzel, Victor Brack
Auschwitz – Sonderkommandos (21)
Miklos Nyiszli; Filip Müller, Sigismund Bendel, Szlama Dragon, Henryk Tauber, Henryk Mandelbaum, Andre Lettich, Stanislaw Jankowski; Milton Buki, Maurice Benroubi, David Olere, Dov Paisikovic, Joshuah Rosenblum, Josef Sackar, Saul Chasan, Jaacov Gabai, Eliezer Eisenschmidt, Leon Cohen, Shlomo Venezia, Salmen Lewental, Lejb Langfus
Auschwitz – Other (59)
Rudolf Vrba, Alfred Wetzler; Ada Bimko, Janda Weiss, Yehuda Bakon, Mordechai Lichtenstein, Liebermann, Regina Bialek, Sophia Litwinska, Ruth Elias, Klari Weiss, Primo Levi, Kitty Hart, Fania Fenelon, Olga Lengyel, Eugene Heimler, Elie Wiesel, Czeslaw Mordowicz, Arnost Rosin, Benedikt Kautsky, Moshe Garbarz, Rajzla Sadowska, Erwin Valentin, Lucie Adelsberger; Adolf Rögner, Erwin Bartel, Wilhelm Wohlfahrt, Bruno Baum, Hermann Langbein, Ella Lingens-Reiner, Walter Petzold, Otto Wolken, Marie-Claude Vaillant-Couturier, Jerzy Tabeau, Stanislaw Klodzinski, Stanislaw Chybinski, K.J., Franciszek Gulba, Jolan Holthost, Michal Kula, Seweryna Szmaglewskaya, Ludwig Nagraba, Zenon Rozanski, Josef Koczorowski, Ludwig Rajewski, Roman Taul, Feliks Mylyk, Zygmunt Smuzewski, Jiri Beranowsky, Eugeniusz Motz, Bogdan Glinski, Josef Vacek, Czeslaw Glowaki, Wojciech Barcz, Ludwig Banach, Wieslaw Kielar, Kazimierz Smolen, Henryk Porebski, Hugo Breiden,
Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor, Treblinka (52+)
‘Szlamek’, Mordechai Zurawski, Michal Podchlebnik, Shimon Srebrnik, Jankiel Wiernik, Samuel Rajzman, Elias Rosenberg, Abraham Bomba, Richard Glazar, Samuel Willenberg, Chil Rajchman, Szymon Goldberg, Tanhum Grinberg, Shalom Cohen, Abraham Goldfarb, Oskar Berger, Abe Kon, Moszeks Laks, Maniek Plakiewicz, Stanislaw Borowy, Oscar Strawczynski, Israel Cymlich, Rudolf Reder, Chaim Hirszman, Alexander Pechersky, Leon Feldhendler, Zelda Metz, Esther Rab, Stanislaw Szmajzner, Moshe Bahir, Itzak Lichtman, Eda Litchman, Aizik Rottenberg, Yehuda Lerner, Dov Ber Freiberg, Ursula Stern, Chaim Engel, Hershl Zukerman, Kurt Thomas, Thomas Blatt, Jacob Biskubicz; Stanislaw Kozak, Jan Piwonski, Jan G., Eugeniusz Goch, Edward F, Maria Daniel, Tadeusz M, Michal Kusmierczak, Eustachy Ukrainski, Jan Sulkowski, Jules Schelvis
KZ inmates (3)
Franz Blaha, Margarete Buber-Neumann, Benen Anton,
Other (10)
Zygmunt Klukowski, Paul Roser, Jan Karski, Erich Heubaum, Rozalka Schelewna Schier, Emanuel Ringelbum, Chaim Kaplan, Hersh Smolar, Heinz Rosenberg, Herman Kruk
Deluded Witnesses (2)
Moshe Peer, Irene Zisblatt
Lying Witnesses (2)
Martin Gray, Herman Rosenblatt
False Witnesses (2)
Benjamin Wilkomirski, Misha Defoncesca


I'm quite sure that Saggy and co won't be able to muster up the energy to even mention more than a few of these names in any future post (unless they copy and paste from the above), so probably the best use is to gauge how far Saggy and co fall short of managing to discuss what other deniers have discussed.

Let's call it an even 200, although there are actually more on the list, for convenience's sake. Thus, a Clayton Moore "Zisblatt" post scores 0.5% on the Rev-o-Meter, whereas Saggy's handwaving little list of seven names scores 3.5% on the same scale. A Dogzilla post waffling about Goering or Kaltenbrunner would similarly score 0.5% on the Rev-o-Meter, unless he managed to discuss both, in which case it'd be 1%.

As no revisionist, not even the loftiest guru, has ever produced a work that discusses all 200+ witnesses, at least Saggy and co can console themselves by knowing that Butz, Rudolf etc aren't actually much smarter or scientific than they are. Ah well.
 
Last edited:
Rather than watch Saggy repeat the same names over and over, perhaps it's time to throw a more substantive list of witnesses on the table. .

I did not ask to see a list of 200 pathological liars, I asked to see the name of one credible Jewish witness to the holohoax. Name him/her. Let's examine the lies of any witness you want to pick in detail. We know Yad Vashem has a list of 50,000 pathological liars, we don't need your list of 200. Just name ONE.
 
I did not ask to see a list of 200 pathological liars, I asked to see the name of one credible Jewish witness to the holohoax. Name him/her. Let's examine the lies of any witness you want to pick in detail. We know Yad Vashem has a list of 50,000 pathological liars, we don't need your list of 200. Just name ONE.

What criteria do we need to consider when producing this witness. You have already dismissed 50,000 witnesses without knowing their story, without explanation, so what point are you really trying to make?
 
The lies of Zizblatt are representative, as are the lies of Wiernik, Wiesel, Bomba, Meuller, Rosenberg, Vrba, et. al. There is not a single credible Jewish holohoax witness.


And you have yet to provide a single credible piece of evidence for this vast global conspiracy where all media is controlled by Jews that you put forth some posts back.
 
I did not ask to see a list of 200 pathological liars, I asked to see the name of one credible Jewish witness to the holohoax. Name him/her. Let's examine the lies of any witness you want to pick in detail. We know Yad Vashem has a list of 50,000 pathological liars, we don't need your list of 200. Just name ONE.
I gave you 3 names. All were witnesses to aspects of the genocide. Oscar Strawczynski was on Nick's list and in my post as well. You have now called him a liar and a pathological liar. I asked you to detail Strawczynski's lies and to prove he lied. Now you need to show that his lying was pathological. Please answer my questions about Strawczynski and the other 2 witnesses I named instead of claiming you weren't given the right reply to your statement and dodging having to make out any sort of case to support your rather broad claim.
 
Last edited:
I did not ask to see a list of 200 pathological liars, I asked to see the name of one credible Jewish witness to the holohoax. Name him/her. Let's examine the lies of any witness you want to pick in detail. We know Yad Vashem has a list of 50,000 pathological liars, we don't need your list of 200. Just name ONE.

There´s the problem: You asked for a name, Nick gave you several, you dismiss them out of hand because, since their testimony would demolish your denier fantasies, they cannot possibly be reliable witnesses.

Where is your evidence that these people, other than the last six Nick listed, are pathological liars? I mean, other than the fact that you do not want their statements to be true?
 
I did not ask to see a list of 200 pathological liars, I asked to see the name of one credible Jewish witness to the holohoax. Name him/her. Let's examine the lies of any witness you want to pick in detail. We know Yad Vashem has a list of 50,000 pathological liars, we don't need your list of 200. Just name ONE.

Nobody cares what you asked, Saggy. Your request for 'one' witness means you score 0.5% on the Rev-O-Meter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom